Literature DB >> 33238017

Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Equivalent in Patients Who Receive Vertebral Body Tethering Versus Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Catherine Qiu, Divya Talwar, James Gordon, Anthony Capraro, Carina Lott, Patrick J Cahill.   

Abstract

Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT), or spinal growth tethering, is an emerging technology that recently received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval through a humanitarian device exemption designation to treat idiopathic scoliosis patients with remaining growth. This study compared patients who underwent AVBT with those treated with standard-of-care posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to determine inherent differences in patients and families who seek cutting-edge treatments. The authors reviewed 62 PSF patients from a multicenter registry and 20 AVBT patients from an FDA-approved investigational clinical trial. The authors examined demographics, preoperative clinical and radiographic variables, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). All included patients preoperatively were classified as Lenke type 1 or 2 with a thoracic curve of 35° to 60°, a lumbar curve less than 35°, and a skeletal maturity score of Risser sign 0 or Sanders bone age of 4 or less. Idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with surgical intervention were primarily White females who were 12 years old. No differences in demographics, clinical variables, and radiographic measures were detected between the PSF and AVBT cohorts. The AVBT group showed more thoracic flexibility on bending radiographs, correcting on average 59% compared with 43% for PSF patients (P=.005). Patients had similar HRQOL total scores and scores across each of the 5 domains of the Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire Version 22. The percentage of patients scoring below 4.0 within each domain was comparable between cohorts. Scoliosis patients who underwent vertebral tethering at a level of deformity magnitude and maturity similar to those who underwent posterior fusion did not differ at baseline regarding demographics, clinical variables, and HRQOL. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(1):24-28.]. Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33238017     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20201119-02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  5 in total

1.  Thoracic posterior spinal instrumented fusion vs. thoracic anterior spinal tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a minimum of 2-year follow-up: a cost comparison of index and revision operations.

Authors:  Alekos A Theologis; Hao-Hua Wu; Mohammad Diab
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-09-21

2.  As Vertebral Body Tethering Impacts Missouri, New Technology Grows in the Right Direction.

Authors:  Daniel G Hoernschemeyer; Melanie E Boeyer
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr

3.  Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis: how well does the tether hold up?

Authors:  Dhruv Shankar; Lily Eaker; Theodor Di Pauli von Treuheim; Jared Tishelman; Zacharia Silk; Baron S Lonner
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-03-08

4.  Complications following surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 10-year prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Arun R Hariharan; Suken A Shah; Joseph Petfield; Margaret Baldwin; Burt Yaszay; Peter O Newton; Lawrence G Lenke; Baron S Lonner; Firoz Miyanji; Paul D Sponseller; Amer F Samdani
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-04-30

Review 5.  Vertebral Body Tethering: Indications, Surgical Technique, and a Systematic Review of Published Results.

Authors:  Arimatias Raitio; Johanna Syvänen; Ilkka Helenius
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.964

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.