Literature DB >> 36130228

A mitochondria-specific mutational signature of aging: increased rate of A > G substitutions on the heavy strand.

Alina G Mikhailova1,2, Alina A Mikhailova1, Kristina Ushakova1, Evgeny O Tretiakov1,3, Dmitrii Iliushchenko1, Victor Shamansky1, Valeria Lobanova1, Ivan Kozenkov1, Bogdan Efimenko1, Andrey A Yurchenko4, Elena Kozenkova5, Evgeny M Zdobnov6,7, Vsevolod Makeev2,8, Valerian Yurov5, Masashi Tanaka9, Irina Gostimskaya10, Zoe Fleischmann11, Sofia Annis11, Melissa Franco11, Kevin Wasko11, Stepan Denisov1,12, Wolfram S Kunz13, Dmitry Knorre14, Ilya Mazunin15,16,17, Sergey Nikolaev4, Jacques Fellay7,18, Alexandre Reymond19, Konstantin Khrapko11, Konstantin Gunbin1,20, Konstantin Popadin1,7,18.   

Abstract

The mutational spectrum of the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) does not resemble any of the known mutational signatures of the nuclear genome and variation in mtDNA mutational spectra between different organisms is still incomprehensible. Since mitochondria are responsible for aerobic respiration, it is expected that mtDNA mutational spectrum is affected by oxidative damage. Assuming that oxidative damage increases with age, we analyse mtDNA mutagenesis of different species in regards to their generation length. Analysing, (i) dozens of thousands of somatic mtDNA mutations in samples of different ages (ii) 70053 polymorphic synonymous mtDNA substitutions reconstructed in 424 mammalian species with different generation lengths and (iii) synonymous nucleotide content of 650 complete mitochondrial genomes of mammalian species we observed that the frequency of AH > GH substitutions (H: heavy strand notation) is twice bigger in species with high versus low generation length making their mtDNA more AH poor and GH rich. Considering that AH > GH substitutions are also sensitive to the time spent single-stranded (TSSS) during asynchronous mtDNA replication we demonstrated that AH > GH substitution rate is a function of both species-specific generation length and position-specific TSSS. We propose that AH > GH is a mitochondria-specific signature of oxidative damage associated with both aging and TSSS.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36130228      PMCID: PMC9561281          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   19.160


  59 in total

1.  Aerobiosis increases the genomic guanine plus cytosine content (GC%) in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Hugo Naya; Héctor Romero; Alejandro Zavala; Beatriz Alvarez; Héctor Musto
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  [Proteins associated with mitochondrial DNA protect it against the action of X-rays and hydrogen peroxide].

Authors:  N A Guliaeva; E A Kuznetsova; A I Gaziev
Journal:  Biofizika       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  Multiple ways to prevent transmission of paternal mitochondrial DNA for maternal inheritance in animals.

Authors:  Ken Sato; Miyuki Sato
Journal:  J Biochem       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.387

4.  Extension of murine life span by overexpression of catalase targeted to mitochondria.

Authors:  Samuel E Schriner; Nancy J Linford; George M Martin; Piper Treuting; Charles E Ogburn; Mary Emond; Pinar E Coskun; Warren Ladiges; Norman Wolf; Holly Van Remmen; Douglas C Wallace; Peter S Rabinovitch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Protein oxidation and aging.

Authors:  Earl R Stadtman
Journal:  Free Radic Res       Date:  2006-12

Review 6.  Inosine in DNA and RNA.

Authors:  Ingrun Alseth; Bjørn Dalhus; Magnar Bjørås
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 5.578

7.  Synonymous codon usage pattern in mitochondrial CYB gene in pisces, aves, and mammals.

Authors:  Arif Uddin; Supriyo Chakraborty
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 1.514

8.  Origins and functional consequences of somatic mitochondrial DNA mutations in human cancer.

Authors:  Young Seok Ju; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Moritz Gerstung; Inigo Martincorena; Serena Nik-Zainal; Manasa Ramakrishna; Helen R Davies; Elli Papaemmanuil; Gunes Gundem; Adam Shlien; Niccolo Bolli; Sam Behjati; Patrick S Tarpey; Jyoti Nangalia; Charles E Massie; Adam P Butler; Jon W Teague; George S Vassiliou; Anthony R Green; Ming-Qing Du; Ashwin Unnikrishnan; John E Pimanda; Bin Tean Teh; Nikhil Munshi; Mel Greaves; Paresh Vyas; Adel K El-Naggar; Tom Santarius; V Peter Collins; Richard Grundy; Jack A Taylor; D Neil Hayes; David Malkin; Christopher S Foster; Anne Y Warren; Hayley C Whitaker; Daniel Brewer; Rosalind Eeles; Colin Cooper; David Neal; Tapio Visakorpi; William B Isaacs; G Steven Bova; Adrienne M Flanagan; P Andrew Futreal; Andy G Lynch; Patrick F Chinnery; Ultan McDermott; Michael R Stratton; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Ultra-sensitive sequencing reveals an age-related increase in somatic mitochondrial mutations that are inconsistent with oxidative damage.

Authors:  Scott R Kennedy; Jesse J Salk; Michael W Schmitt; Lawrence A Loeb
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 10.  DNA mismatch repair and oxidative DNA damage: implications for cancer biology and treatment.

Authors:  Gemma Bridge; Sukaina Rashid; Sarah A Martin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.