Literature DB >> 26715214

Propofol Breath Monitoring as a Potential Tool to Improve the Prediction of Intraoperative Plasma Concentrations.

Pieter Colin1,2, Douglas J Eleveld3, Johannes P van den Berg3, Hugo E M Vereecke3, Michel M R F Struys3,4, Gustav Schelling5, Christian C Apfel6, Cyrill Hornuss5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Monitoring of drug concentrations in breathing gas is routinely being used to individualize drug dosing for the inhalation anesthetics. For intravenous anesthetics however, no decisive evidence in favor of breath concentration monitoring has been presented up until now. At the same time, questions remain with respect to the performance of currently used plasma pharmacokinetic models implemented in target-controlled infusion systems. In this study, we investigate whether breath monitoring of propofol could improve the predictive performance of currently applied, target-controlled infusion models.
METHODS: Based on data from a healthy volunteer study, we developed an addition to the current state-of-the-art pharmacokinetic model for propofol, to accommodate breath concentration measurements. The potential of using this pharmacokinetic (PK) model in a Bayesian forecasting setting was studied using a simulation study. Finally, by introducing bispectral index monitor (BIS) measurements and the accompanying BIS models into our PK model, we investigated the relationship between BIS and predicted breath concentrations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We show that the current state-of-the-art pharmacokinetic model is easily extended to reliably describe propofol kinetics in exhaled breath. Furthermore, we show that the predictive performance of the a priori model is improved by Bayesian adaptation based on the measured breath concentrations, thereby allowing further treatment individualization and a more stringent control on the targeted plasma concentrations during general anesthesia. Finally, we demonstrated concordance between currently advocated BIS models, relying on predicted effect-site concentrations, and our new approach in which BIS measurements are derived from predicted breath concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26715214     DOI: 10.1007/s40262-015-0358-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  23 in total

1.  Simultaneous vs. sequential analysis for population PK/PD data I: best-case performance.

Authors:  Liping Zhang; Stuart L Beal; Lewis B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children.

Authors:  B Marsh; M White; N Morton; G N Kenny
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Blood gas partition coefficient and pulmonary extraction ratio for propofol in goats and pigs.

Authors:  M Grossherr; A Hengstenberg; L Dibbelt; B-W Igl; R Noel; A v d Knesebeck; P Schmucker; H Gehring
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.908

4.  Application of physiology-based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling to individualized target-controlled propofol infusions.

Authors:  Andrea N Edginton; Walter Schmitt; Stefan Willmann
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  A compartmental model for the prediction of breath concentration and absorbed dose of chloroform after exposure while showering.

Authors:  R L Chinery; A K Gleason
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 6.  Propofol: the challenges of formulation.

Authors:  Max T Baker; Mohamed Naguib
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Influence of administration rate on propofol plasma-effect site equilibration.

Authors:  Michel M R F Struys; Marc J Coppens; Nikolaas De Neve; Eric P Mortier; Anthony G Doufas; Jan F P Van Bocxlaer; Steven L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  A general purpose pharmacokinetic model for propofol.

Authors:  Douglas J Eleveld; Johannes H Proost; Luis I Cortínez; Anthony R Absalom; Michel M R F Struys
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Application of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to assess propofol hepatic and renal glucuronidation in isolation: utility of in vitro and in vivo data.

Authors:  Katherine L Gill; Michael Gertz; J Brian Houston; Aleksandra Galetin
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.922

10.  Two different approaches for pharmacokinetic modeling of exhaled drug concentrations.

Authors:  S Kreuer; A Hauschild; T Fink; J I Baumbach; S Maddula; Th Volk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  7 in total

1.  Humidity and measurement of volatile propofol using MCC-IMS (EDMON).

Authors:  Tobias Teucke; F Maurer; L M Müller-Wirtz; T Volk; D I Sessler; S Kreuer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 1.977

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic Pharmacodynamic Modelling Contributions to Improve Paediatric Anaesthesia Practice.

Authors:  James D Morse; Luis Ignacio Cortinez; Brian J Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Correlation of exhaled propofol with Narcotrend index and calculated propofol plasma levels in children undergoing surgery under total intravenous anesthesia - an observational study.

Authors:  Sebastian Heiderich; Tara Ghasemi; Nils Dennhardt; Robert Sümpelmann; Vanessa Rigterink; Katja Nickel; Oliver Keil; Dietmar Böthig; Christiane E Beck
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Target-Controlled Continuous Infusion for Antibiotic Dosing: Proof-of-Principle in an In-silico Vancomycin Trial in Intensive Care Unit Patients.

Authors:  Pieter J Colin; Stijn Jonckheere; Michel M R F Struys
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Bayesian statistics in anesthesia practice: a tutorial for anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Michele Introna; Johannes P van den Berg; Douglas J Eleveld; Michel M R F Struys
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Online exhaled propofol monitoring in normal-weight and obese surgical patients.

Authors:  Martin R Braathen; Ivan Rimstad; Terje Dybvik; Ståle Nygård; Johan Raeder
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.274

Review 7.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol.

Authors:  Marko M Sahinovic; Michel M R F Struys; Anthony R Absalom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.447

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.