Pieter Colin1,2, Douglas J Eleveld3, Johannes P van den Berg3, Hugo E M Vereecke3, Michel M R F Struys3,4, Gustav Schelling5, Christian C Apfel6, Cyrill Hornuss5. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30 001, Groningen, 9700 RB, The Netherlands. P.J.Colin@umcg.nl. 2. Laboratory of Medical Biochemistry and Clinical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. P.J.Colin@umcg.nl. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Postbus 30 001, Groningen, 9700 RB, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Anesthesia, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 5. Department of Anaesthesiology, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Monitoring of drug concentrations in breathing gas is routinely being used to individualize drug dosing for the inhalation anesthetics. For intravenous anesthetics however, no decisive evidence in favor of breath concentration monitoring has been presented up until now. At the same time, questions remain with respect to the performance of currently used plasma pharmacokinetic models implemented in target-controlled infusion systems. In this study, we investigate whether breath monitoring of propofol could improve the predictive performance of currently applied, target-controlled infusion models. METHODS: Based on data from a healthy volunteer study, we developed an addition to the current state-of-the-art pharmacokinetic model for propofol, to accommodate breath concentration measurements. The potential of using this pharmacokinetic (PK) model in a Bayesian forecasting setting was studied using a simulation study. Finally, by introducing bispectral index monitor (BIS) measurements and the accompanying BIS models into our PK model, we investigated the relationship between BIS and predicted breath concentrations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We show that the current state-of-the-art pharmacokinetic model is easily extended to reliably describe propofol kinetics in exhaled breath. Furthermore, we show that the predictive performance of the a priori model is improved by Bayesian adaptation based on the measured breath concentrations, thereby allowing further treatment individualization and a more stringent control on the targeted plasma concentrations during general anesthesia. Finally, we demonstrated concordance between currently advocated BIS models, relying on predicted effect-site concentrations, and our new approach in which BIS measurements are derived from predicted breath concentrations.
INTRODUCTION: Monitoring of drug concentrations in breathing gas is routinely being used to individualize drug dosing for the inhalation anesthetics. For intravenous anesthetics however, no decisive evidence in favor of breath concentration monitoring has been presented up until now. At the same time, questions remain with respect to the performance of currently used plasma pharmacokinetic models implemented in target-controlled infusion systems. In this study, we investigate whether breath monitoring of propofol could improve the predictive performance of currently applied, target-controlled infusion models. METHODS: Based on data from a healthy volunteer study, we developed an addition to the current state-of-the-art pharmacokinetic model for propofol, to accommodate breath concentration measurements. The potential of using this pharmacokinetic (PK) model in a Bayesian forecasting setting was studied using a simulation study. Finally, by introducing bispectral index monitor (BIS) measurements and the accompanying BIS models into our PK model, we investigated the relationship between BIS and predicted breath concentrations. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: We show that the current state-of-the-art pharmacokinetic model is easily extended to reliably describe propofol kinetics in exhaled breath. Furthermore, we show that the predictive performance of the a priori model is improved by Bayesian adaptation based on the measured breath concentrations, thereby allowing further treatment individualization and a more stringent control on the targeted plasma concentrations during general anesthesia. Finally, we demonstrated concordance between currently advocated BIS models, relying on predicted effect-site concentrations, and our new approach in which BIS measurements are derived from predicted breath concentrations.
Authors: M Grossherr; A Hengstenberg; L Dibbelt; B-W Igl; R Noel; A v d Knesebeck; P Schmucker; H Gehring Journal: Xenobiotica Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 1.908
Authors: Michel M R F Struys; Marc J Coppens; Nikolaas De Neve; Eric P Mortier; Anthony G Doufas; Jan F P Van Bocxlaer; Steven L Shafer Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Douglas J Eleveld; Johannes H Proost; Luis I Cortínez; Anthony R Absalom; Michel M R F Struys Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 5.108