| Literature DB >> 36128843 |
Xiaoli Wu1, Yan Liu1, Keji Li1, Yinghong Yang2, Ping Lai1, Jing Li3, Sen Kou1.
Abstract
Objectives: To analyze whether thyroglobulin (Tg) and anti-Tg antibody (TgAb) detection in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of cervical lymph node (LN; LN-FNA-Tg and LN-FNA-TgAb) can predict LN metastasis and obtain the best cutoff value.Entities:
Keywords: fine-needle aspiration; lymph node; papillary thyroid carcinoma; thyroglobulin; thyroglobulin antibody
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36128843 PMCID: PMC9500251 DOI: 10.1177/15330338221127605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 1533-0338
Characteristics of the Patients.
| Metastasis group | Nonmetastasis group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients, | 29 | 42 | — |
| Age (years), median (range) | 39 (31, 48) | 44.5 (38, 50) | .048 |
| Sex, | .336* | ||
| Male | 3 (10.3) | 9 (21.4) | |
| Female | 26 (89.7) | 33 (78.6) | |
| Status, | .291 | ||
| First-time operation | 22 (75.9) | 36 (85.7) | |
| Postoperative suspicion | 7 (24.1) | 6 (14.3) | |
| Lymph nodes, | 71 | 105 | — |
| Echo type, | |||
| Isoecho | 1 (1.6) | 0 | .390* |
| Hypoecho | 31 (50) | 71 (73.2) | .003 |
| Poorly defined margins | 22 (35.5) | 33 (34) | .850 |
| Cystic solid | 13 (21) | 4 (4.1) | .001 |
| Envelope invasion, n (%) | 45 (75.0) | 64 (63.4) | .127 |
| Minimum diameter of LN (mm), median (range) | 9 (7, 11.5) | 7 (5, 8) | <.001 |
| LN-FNA-Tg (ng/mL), median (range) | 1897 (360.75, 10503.6) | 7.74 (0.94, 86.37) | <.001 |
| LN-FNA-TgAb (IU/mL) | 15.65 (8.775, 53.89) | 8.21 (5.78, 9.17) | <.001 |
| Serum Tg (ng/mL) | 25.4 (7.415, 48.46) | 18.81 (1.78, 30.6) | .005 |
| Serum TgAb (IU/mL) | 26.6 (14.62, 217.7) | 28.6 (15.1, 295.4) | .477 |
Abbreviations: LN-FNA-Tg, thyroglobulin washout of fine-needle aspiration of a lymph node; LN-FNA-TgAb, antithyroglobulin antibody washout of fine-needle aspiration of a lymph node; Tg, thyroglobulin; TgAb, antithyroglobulin antibody.
*The P-value was obtained by Fisher's exact probability method.
Diagnostic Value Evaluation.
| Modalities | Cutoff | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LN-FNA-Tg | >227.1 | 0.927 | 84.51 | 89.52 | 84.5 | 89.5 | 87.50 |
| LN-FNA-TgAb | >10.85 | 0.768 | 64.79 | 89.52 | 80.7 | 79.0 | 79.55 |
| Serum Tg | >24.96 | 0.624 | 53.52 | 71.43 | 55.9 | 69.4 | 64.20 |
| Serum TgAb | ≤27.8 | 0.532 | 67.61 | 50.48 | 48.0 | 69.7 | 57.39 |
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; LN-FNA-Tg, thyroglobulin washout of fine-needle aspiration of a lymph node; LN-FNA-TgAb, antithyroglobulin antibody washout of fine-needle aspiration of a lymph node; Tg, thyroglobulin; TgAb, antithyroglobulin antibody.
Figure 1.ROC curve to determine the cutoff value of LN-FNA-Tg/LN-FNA-TgAb/serum Tg/serum TgAb.
Subgroup Analyses.
| First-time operation | Postoperative suspicion |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients, | 58 | 13 | — |
| Age (years), median (range) | 44 (35, 50) | 40 (34, 48) | .858 |
| Sex, | .804 | ||
| Male | 9 (15.5) | 3 (23.1) | |
| Female | 49 (84.5) | 10 (76.9) | |
| Metastasis, | 22 (37.9) | 7 (53.8) | .291 |
| Lymph nodes, | 147 | 29 | — |
| Echo type, | |||
| Isoecho | 1 (0.7) | 0 | 1.000* |
| Hypoecho | 95 (64.6) | 7 (58.3) | .901 |
| Poor | 50 (34) | 5 (41.7) | .826 |
| Cystic solid | 17 (11.6) | 0 | .447 |
| Envelope invasion, n (%) | 104 (70.7) | 5 (35.7) | .017 |
| Minimum diameter of LN (mm), median (range) | 7 (6, 9) | 9 (7, 11) | .010 |
| LN-FNA-Tg (ng/mL) | 86.33 (4.4, 518.5) | 754 (1.99, 2300) | .234 |
| LN-FNA-TgAb (IU/mL) | 8.56 (6.475, 13.005) | 9.51 (5.78, 18.9) | .352 |
| Serum Tg (ng/mL) | 20.6 (5.15, 30.6) | 25.4 (4.38, 48.46) | .585 |
| Serum TgAb (IU/mL) | 27 (16.1, 457.7) | 18.2 (10.4, 27.8) | .001 |
Abbreviations: LN-FNA-Tg, thyroglobulin washout of fine-needle aspiration of a lymph node; LN-FNA-TgAb, antithyroglobulin antibody washout of fine-needle aspiration of a lymph node; Tg, thyroglobulin; TgAb, antithyroglobulin antibody.
*The P-value is obtained by Fisher's exact probability method.
Diagnostic Value Evaluation in the First-Time Operation Subgroup.
| Modalities | Cutoff | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LN-FNA-Tg | >227.1 | 0.902 | 80.77 | 88.42 | 79.2 | 89.4 | 85.71 |
| LN-FNA-TgAb | >10.85 | 0.763 | 63.46 | 89.47 | 76.7 | 81.7 | 80.27 |
| Serum Tg | >3.29 | 0.603 | 92.31 | 28.42 | 41.4 | 87.1 | 51.02 |
| Serum TgAb | ≤27 | 0.506 | 61.54 | 52.63 | 41.6 | 71.4 | 55.78 |
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; LN-FNA-Tg, thyroglobulin washout of fine-needle aspiration of a lymph node; LN-FNA-TgAb, antithyroglobulin antibody washout of fine-needle aspiration of a lymph node; Tg, thyroglobulin; TgAb, antithyroglobulin antibody.
Figure 2.ROC curve: the cutoff value of Tg and TgAb in the first-time operation subgroup.
Diagnostic Value Evaluation in the Postoperative Suspicion Subgroup.
| Modalities | Cutoff | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive predictive value | Negative predictive value | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LN-FNA-Tg | >6.8 | 1.000 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| LN-FNA-TgAb | >8.91 | 0.774 | 78.95 | 80.00 | 88.2 | 66.7 | 79.31 |
| Serum Tg | >24.96 | 0.705 | 68.42 | 70.00 | 81.2 | 53.8 | 68.97 |
| Serum TgAb | >11.49 | 0.518 | 73.68 | 50.00 | 73.7 | 50.0 | 65.52 |
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; LN-FNA-Tg, thyroglobulin washout of fine-needle aspiration of a lymph node; LN-FNA-TgAb, antithyroglobulin antibody washout of fine-needle aspiration of a lymph node; Tg, thyroglobulin; TgAb, antithyroglobulin antibody.
Figure 3.ROC curve: the cutoff value of Tg/TgAb in the postoperative suspicion subgroup.