Literature DB >> 26077238

Presence and Number of Lymph Node Metastases Are Associated With Compromised Survival for Patients Younger Than Age 45 Years With Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam1, John Pura1, Paolo Goffredo1, Michaela A Dinan1, Shelby D Reed1, Randall P Scheri1, Terry Hyslop1, Sanziana A Roman1, Julie A Sosa2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cervical lymph node metastases are recognized as a prognostic indicator only in patients age 45 years or older with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC); patients younger than age 45 years are perceived to have low-risk disease. The current American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for PTC in patients younger than age 45 years does not include cervical lymph node metastases. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that the presence and number of cervical lymph node metastases have an adverse impact on overall survival (OS) in patients younger than age 45 years with PTC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients younger than age 45 years undergoing surgery for stage I PTC (no distant metastases) were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB; 1998-2006) and from SEER 1988-2006 data. Multivariable models were used to examine the association of OS with the presence of lymph node metastases and number of metastatic nodes.
RESULTS: In all, 47,902 patients in NCDB (11,740 with and 36,162 without nodal metastases) and 21,855 in the SEER database (5,188 with and 16,667 without nodal metastases) were included. After adjustment, OS was compromised for patients with nodal metastases compared with patients who did not have them (NCDB: hazard ratio (HR), 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.67; P = .021; SEER: HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.56; P = .006). After adjustment, increasing number of metastatic lymph nodes was associated with decreasing OS up to six metastatic nodes (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.25; P = .03), after which more positive nodes conferred no additional mortality risk (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.05; P = .75).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that cervical lymph node metastases are associated with compromised survival in young patients, warranting consideration of revised American Joint Committee on Cancer staging. A change point of six or fewer metastatic lymph nodes seems to carry prognostic significance, thus advocating for rigorous preoperative screening for nodal metastases.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26077238     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.8391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  104 in total

Review 1.  Surgical management of papillary thyroid carcinoma: an overview.

Authors:  Paolo Miccoli; Sohail Bakkar
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-04-12

Review 2.  Reappraisal of the indication for radioiodine thyroid ablation in differentiated thyroid cancer patients.

Authors:  M G Castagna; S Cantara; F Pacini
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  A retrospective study of the risk factors and the prognosis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma depending on the number of lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Zhong Ying Rui; Yang Liu; Wei Zheng; Xuan Wang; Zhao Wei Meng; Jian Tan; Ning Li; Qiang Jia
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Updated American Joint Committee on Cancer/Tumor-Node-Metastasis Staging System for Differentiated and Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer (Eighth Edition): What Changed and Why?

Authors:  R Michael Tuttle; Bryan Haugen; Nancy D Perrier
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 6.568

Review 5.  Surgical approach to level VI in papillary thyroid carcinoma: an overview.

Authors:  Carmela De Crea; Marco Raffaelli; Luca Sessa; Celestino Pio Lombardi; Rocco Bellantone
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-06-13

6.  Prognosis of patients with TX stage differentiated thyroid cancer: propensity scored matching analysis of the SEER database 2004-2013.

Authors:  Yiquan Xiong; Qiuyang Zhao; Chunping Liu; Shuntao Wang; Zeming Liu; Tao Huang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 7.  The changing incidence of thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Cari M Kitahara; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 8.  Post-treatment surveillance of thyroid cancer.

Authors:  L Y Wang; I Ganly
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Prognostic Value of the Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes in Pathological Nx or N0 Classical Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tae-Yon Sung; Jong Ho Yoon; Dong Eun Song; Yu-Mi Lee; Tae-Yong Kim; Ki-Wook Chung; Won Bae Kim; Young Kee Shong; Suck Joon Hong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Management of the Neck in Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Panagiotis Asimakopoulos; Ashok R Shaha; Iain J Nixon; Jatin P Shah; Gregory W Randolph; Peter Angelos; Mark E Zafereo; Luiz P Kowalski; Dana M Hartl; Kerry D Olsen; Juan P Rodrigo; Vincent Vander Poorten; Antti A Mäkitie; Alvaro Sanabria; Carlos Suárez; Miquel Quer; Francisco J Civantos; K Thomas Robbins; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Marc Hamoir; Alessandra Rinaldo; Alfio Ferlito
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.