Literature DB >> 36125279

Rimegepant, Ubrogepant, and Lasmiditan in the Acute Treatment of Migraine Examining the Benefit-Risk Profile Using Number Needed to Treat/Harm.

Karissa M Johnston1, Lauren Powell1, Evan Popoff1, Linda Harris2, Robert Croop2, Vladimir Coric2, Gilbert L'Italien2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop and compare benefit-risk profiles for rimegepant, ubrogepant, and lasmiditan based on a network meta-analysis (NMA) of published clinical trials.
METHODS: A fixed-effects Bayesian NMA of randomized controlled trials of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of adults with migraine were used to determine risk differences for efficacy and safety outcomes of the 3 treatments compared with pooled placebo. Risk differences were used to calculate number needed to treat (NNT) for pain relief and pain freedom at 2 and 2 to 24 hours and freedom from most bothersome symptoms at 2 hours; and number needed to harm (NNH) for dizziness and nausea, relative to placebo.
RESULTS: Results were based on 5 randomized controlled trials (NCT03461757, NCT02828020, NCT02867709, NCT02439320, and NCT02605174). NNT to achieve sustained pain relief at 2 to 24 hours was lowest for rimegepant 75 mg (5; 95% credible interval [Crl]: 4, 7) and ubrogepant 100 mg (5; 95% Crl: 4, 8) and highest for ubrogepant 25 mg (8; 95% Crl: 5, 16). Rimegepant had the lowest NNT to achieve sustained pain freedom at 2 to 24 hours and lasmiditan 50 mg had the highest (7; 95% Crl: 5, 12 vs. 26; 95% Crl: 13, 95). NNH for dizziness and nausea was highest for ubrogepant 25 mg (28; 95% Crl: 15, 62 and 99; 95% Crl: -2580, 2378, respectively). Lasmiditan 200 mg had the lowest NNH for dizziness and rimegepant 75 mg had the lowest NNH for nausea.
CONCLUSIONS: The benefit-risk profiles of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant may improve clinical decision-making.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36125279      PMCID: PMC9555761          DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.423


  29 in total

1.  Treatment patterns and predictors of costs among patients with migraine: evidence from the United States medical expenditure panel survey.

Authors:  Janet H Ford; Wenyu Ye; Russell M Nichols; Shonda A Foster; David R Nelson
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.448

2.  Effect of Ubrogepant vs Placebo on Pain and the Most Bothersome Associated Symptom in the Acute Treatment of Migraine: The ACHIEVE II Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Richard B Lipton; David W Dodick; Jessica Ailani; Kaifeng Lu; Michelle Finnegan; Armin Szegedi; Joel M Trugman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect.

Authors:  R J Cook; D L Sackett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-18

4.  Oral rimegepant for preventive treatment of migraine: a phase 2/3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Robert Croop; Richard B Lipton; David Kudrow; David A Stock; Lisa Kamen; Charles M Conway; Elyse G Stock; Vladimir Coric; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Targeting CGRP for migraine treatment: mechanisms, antibodies, small molecules, perspectives.

Authors:  Eleonora De Matteis; Martina Guglielmetti; Raffaele Ornello; Valerio Spuntarelli; Paolo Martelletti; Simona Sacco
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.618

6.  Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of acute treatment of migraine attacks in adults: Fourth edition.

Authors:  Hans-Christoph Diener; Cristina Tassorelli; David W Dodick; Stephen D Silberstein; Richard B Lipton; Messoud Ashina; Werner J Becker; Michel D Ferrari; Peter J Goadsby; Patricia Pozo-Rosich; Shuu-Jiun Wang; Jay Mandrekar
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 6.292

7.  Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of lasmiditan for acute treatment of migraine.

Authors:  Peter J Goadsby; Linda A Wietecha; Ellen B Dennehy; Bernice Kuca; Michael G Case; Sheena K Aurora; Charly Gaul
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Comparison of healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with migraine with potentially adequate and insufficient triptan response.

Authors:  Steven C Marcus; Anand R Shewale; Stephen D Silberstein; Richard B Lipton; William B Young; Hema N Viswanathan; Jalpa A Doshi
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 6.292

9.  Lasmiditan is an effective acute treatment for migraine: A phase 3 randomized study.

Authors:  Bernice Kuca; Stephen D Silberstein; Linda Wietecha; Paul H Berg; Gregory Dozier; Richard B Lipton
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Trajectory of migraine-related disability following long-term treatment with lasmiditan: results of the GLADIATOR study.

Authors:  Richard B Lipton; Louise Lombard; Dustin D Ruff; John H Krege; Li Shen Loo; Andrew Buchanan; Thomas E Melby; Dawn C Buse
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 7.277

View more
  1 in total

1.  Rimegepant, Ubrogepant, and Lasmiditan in the Acute Treatment of Migraine Examining the Benefit-Risk Profile Using Number Needed to Treat/Harm.

Authors:  Karissa M Johnston; Lauren Powell; Evan Popoff; Linda Harris; Robert Croop; Vladimir Coric; Gilbert L'Italien
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2022-11-01       Impact factor: 3.423

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.