Literature DB >> 33338437

Oral rimegepant for preventive treatment of migraine: a phase 2/3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Robert Croop1, Richard B Lipton2, David Kudrow3, David A Stock4, Lisa Kamen4, Charles M Conway4, Elyse G Stock4, Vladimir Coric4, Peter J Goadsby5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rimegepant is a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist that has shown efficacy and safety in the acute treatment of migraine. We aimed to compare the efficacy of rimegepant with placebo for preventive treatment of migraine.
METHODS: We did a multicentre, phase 2/3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 92 sites in the USA. Adults with at least a 1-year history of migraine were recruited. After a 4-week observation period, eligible participants were randomised using an interactive web response system to oral rimegepant 75 mg or matching placebo every other day for 12 weeks (double-blind treatment phase). The primary efficacy endpoint was change from the 4-week observation period in the mean number of migraine days per month in the last 4 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase (weeks 9-12). Participants who received at least one dose of their assigned study medication and who had 14 days or more of data in the observation period and 14 days or more of data for at least one 4-week interval during the double-blind treatment phase were analysed for efficacy. Those who received at least one dose of study medication were analysed for safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03732638.
FINDINGS: Between Nov 14, 2018, and Aug 30, 2019, 1591 participants were recruited and assessed for eligibility, of whom 747 were randomly allocated either rimegepant (n=373) or placebo (n=374). 695 participants were included in the analysis for efficacy, of whom 348 were assigned rimegepant and 347 were allocated placebo. Rimegepant was superior to placebo on the primary endpoint of change in the mean number of migraine days per month during weeks 9-12. The change from the observation period in mean number of migraine days per month during weeks 9-12 was -4·3 days (95% CI -4·8 to -3·9) with rimegepant and -3·5 days (-4·0 to -3·0) with placebo (least squares mean difference -0·8 days, 95% CI -1·46 to -0·20; p=0·0099). 741 participants received study medication and were included in the safety analysis. 133 (36%) of 370 patients who received rimegepant reported an adverse event, compared with 133 (36%) of 371 who received placebo. Seven (2%) participants who received rimegepant and four (1%) who received placebo discontinued the study due to an adverse event; no patients died.
INTERPRETATION: Taken every other day, rimegepant was effective for preventive treatment of migraine. Tolerability was similar to that of placebo, and no unexpected or serious safety issues were noted. FUNDING: Biohaven Pharmaceuticals.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33338437     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32544-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  30 in total

Review 1.  Migraine with Brainstem Aura Accompanied by Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Sui-Yi Xu; Hui-Juan Li; Jing Huang; Xiu-Ping Li; Chang-Xin Li
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 2.  Post-traumatic Headache: Pharmacologic Management and Targeting CGRP Signaling.

Authors:  Håkan Ashina; David W Dodick
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 3.  Cardiovascular Disease and Migraine: Are the New Treatments Safe?

Authors:  Jennifer Robblee; Lauren K Harvey
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2022-06-25

Review 4.  Outpatient Approach to Resistant and Refractory Migraine in Children and Adolescents: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Alison Marshall; Rebecca Lindsay; Michelle A Clementi; Amy A Gelfand; Serena L Orr
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.030

5.  Rimegepant, Ubrogepant, and Lasmiditan in the Acute Treatment of Migraine Examining the Benefit-Risk Profile Using Number Needed to Treat/Harm.

Authors:  Karissa M Johnston; Lauren Powell; Evan Popoff; Linda Harris; Robert Croop; Vladimir Coric; Gilbert L'Italien
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2022-11-01       Impact factor: 3.423

Review 6.  Real-World Patient Experience of CGRP-Targeting Therapy for Migraine: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ann M Murray; Jennifer I Stern; Carrie E Robertson; Chia-Chun Chiang
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2022-09-05

Review 7.  Drug Safety in Episodic Migraine Management in Adults Part 1: Acute Treatments.

Authors:  Yulia Y Orlova; Sandhya Mehla; Abigail L Chua
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2022-05-10

Review 8.  Gepants - a long way to cure: a narrative review.

Authors:  Claudia Altamura; Nicoletta Brunelli; Marilena Marcosano; Luisa Fofi; Fabrizio Vernieri
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.830

Review 9.  Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)-Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies and Antagonists in Migraine: Current Evidence and Rationale.

Authors:  Fred Cohen; Hsiangkuo Yuan; Stephen D Silberstein
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 7.744

Review 10.  Acute and Preventive Management of Migraine during Menstruation and Menopause.

Authors:  Raffaele Ornello; Eleonora De Matteis; Chiara Di Felice; Valeria Caponnetto; Francesca Pistoia; Simona Sacco
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.