Literature DB >> 36119396

Receipt of Recovery-Oriented Care Practices During Hospitalization for Sepsis.

Megan A Watson1, Clare Anderson2, Kevin J Karlic1, Cainnear K Hogan3, Sarah Seelye3, Stephanie P Taylor4, Hallie C Prescott1,3.   

Abstract

Survivors of sepsis hospitalization are at high risk for postsepsis morbidity, readmission, and death, but these negative outcomes can be mitigated by receipt of recommended care practices. We sought to assess factors associated with the receipt of recommended recovery-oriented care practices during hospitalization for sepsis. We hypothesized that patients treated in the ICU may be more likely than ward-treated patients to receive recommended care practices given the increasing focus on survivorship in the critical care field.
DESIGN: Observational cohort study.
SETTING: Michigan Medicine, a tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult patients discharged alive from a hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock in 2019. We further limited our cohort to patients receiving longitudinal care viewable in the Michigan Medicine electronic health record to ensure ability to capture posthospital care and outcomes.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three-hundred sixty-five sepsis hospitalizations met study inclusion criteria. Using structured chart review, we determined receipt of the following recovery-based care practices during hospitalization: medication optimization, functional status evaluation at discharge, sepsis education, and scheduled follow-up within 2 weeks. The cohort was 46.6% female, 81.1% White, with a median age of 64 years. 51.2% were treated in the ICU. Medication optimization occurred in 93.7%, functional status evaluation in 82.7%, sepsis education in 20.0%, and scheduled follow-up within 2 weeks in 54.5%. ICU-treated patients had lower receipt of medication optimization and follow-up scheduling but greater receipt of functional and mental health status evaluations. In multivariable models, ICU treatment was associated with lower odds of receiving medication optimization (adjusted odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.03-0.69) and not associated with receipt of other care practices.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows incomplete receipt of recommended recovery-based care practices during sepsis hospitalization in both ward and ICU-treated patients. Sepsis education and mental health evaluation were particularly uncommon.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36119396      PMCID: PMC9473794          DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Explor        ISSN: 2639-8028


  27 in total

1.  Survivorship will be the defining challenge of critical care in the 21st century.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Issues of survivorship are rarely addressed during intensive care unit stays. Baseline results from a statewide quality improvement collaborative.

Authors:  Sushant Govindan; Theodore J Iwashyna; Sam R Watson; Robert C Hyzy; Melissa A Miller
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2014-05

4.  Advancing a Third Revolution in Critical Care.

Authors:  Theodore J Iwashyna; Emily C Speelmon
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 5.  Enhancing Recovery From Sepsis: A Review.

Authors:  Hallie C Prescott; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Deficits in Identification of Goals and Goal-Concordant Care After Sepsis Hospitalization.

Authors:  Stephanie Parks Taylor; Marc A Kowalkowski; Katherine R Courtright; Henry L Burke; Sangnya Patel; Samantha Hicks; Cristina Hurley; Stephen Mitchell; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 2.960

7.  The post-ICU presentation screen (PICUPS) and rehabilitation prescription (RP) for intensive care survivors part I: Development and preliminary clinimetric evaluation.

Authors:  Lynne Turner-Stokes; Evelyn J Corner; Richard J Siegert; Craig Brown; Sarah Wallace; Julie Highfield; Danielle Bear; Leanne M Aitken; Hugh Montgomery; Zudin Puthucheary
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2021-02-18

8.  Early psychological screening of intensive care unit survivors: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Milton; Emily Brück; Anna Schandl; Matteo Bottai; Peter Sackey
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in adult critical care survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cássia Righy; Regis Goulart Rosa; Rodrigo Teixeira Amancio da Silva; Renata Kochhann; Celina Borges Migliavaca; Caroline Cabral Robinson; Stefania Pigatto Teche; Cassiano Teixeira; Fernando Augusto Bozza; Maicon Falavigna
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.