Literature DB >> 36033253

The post-ICU presentation screen (PICUPS) and rehabilitation prescription (RP) for intensive care survivors part I: Development and preliminary clinimetric evaluation.

Lynne Turner-Stokes1,2, Evelyn J Corner3,4, Richard J Siegert5, Craig Brown6, Sarah Wallace7, Julie Highfield8, Danielle Bear9,10, Leanne M Aitken11, Hugh Montgomery12, Zudin Puthucheary13,14.   

Abstract

Background: Patients who have had prolonged stays in intensive care have ongoing rehabilitation needs. This is especially true of COVID-19 ICU patients, who can suffer diverse long-term ill effects. Currently there is no systematic data collection to guide the needs for therapy input for either of these groups nor to inform planning and development of rehabilitation services. These issues could be resolved in part by the systematic use of a clinical tool to support decision-making as patients progress from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), through acute hospital care and onwards into rehabilitation. We describe (i) the development of such a tool (the Post-ICU Presentation Screen (PICUPS)) and (ii) the subsequent preparation of a person-centred Rehabilitation Prescription (RP) to travel with the patient as they continue down the care pathway.
Methods: PICUPS development was led by a core group of experienced clinicians representing the various disciplines involved in post-ICU rehabilitation. Key constructs and item-level descriptors were identified by group consensus. Piloting was performed as part of wider clinical engagement in 26 acute hospitals across England. Development and validation of such a tool requires clinimetric analysis, and this was based on classical test theory. Teams also provided feedback about the feasibility and utility of the tool.
Results: Initial PICUPS design yielded a 24-item tool. In piloting, a total of 552 records were collated from 314 patients, of which 121 (38.5%) had COVID-19. No obvious floor or ceiling effects were apparent. Exploratory factor analysis provided evidence of uni-dimensionality with strong loading on the first principal component accounting for 51% of the variance and Cronbach's alpha for the full-scale score 0.95 - although a 3-factor solution accounted for a further 21%. The PICUPS was responsive to change both at full scale- and item-level. In general, positive responses were seen regarding the tool's ability to describe the patients during their clinical course, engage and flag the relevant professionals needed, and to inform what should be included in an RP. Conclusions: The PICUPS tool has robust scaling properties as a clinical measure and is potentially useful as a tool for identifying rehabilitation needs as patients step down from ICU and acute hospital care. © The Intensive Care Society 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Rehabilitation needs; intensive care

Year:  2021        PMID: 36033253      PMCID: PMC9411778          DOI: 10.1177/1751143720988715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc        ISSN: 1751-1437


  8 in total

1.  Clinimetric perspectives.

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

2.  Management of post-acute covid-19 in primary care.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Matthew Knight; Christine A'Court; Maria Buxton; Laiba Husain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-08-11

3.  Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: A cross-sectional evaluation.

Authors:  Stephen J Halpin; Claire McIvor; Gemma Whyatt; Anastasia Adams; Olivia Harvey; Lyndsay McLean; Christopher Walshaw; Steven Kemp; Joanna Corrado; Rajinder Singh; Tamsin Collins; Rory J O'Connor; Manoj Sivan
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 2.327

4.  Co-Occurrence of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Problems Among 406 Survivors of Critical Illness.

Authors:  Annachiara Marra; Pratik P Pandharipande; Timothy D Girard; Mayur B Patel; Christopher G Hughes; James C Jackson; Jennifer L Thompson; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Eugene Wesley Ely; Nathan E Brummel
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Margaret S Herridge; Angela M Cheung; Catherine M Tansey; Andrea Matte-Martyn; Natalia Diaz-Granados; Fatma Al-Saidi; Andrew B Cooper; Cameron B Guest; C David Mazer; Sangeeta Mehta; Thomas E Stewart; Aiala Barr; Deborah Cook; Arthur S Slutsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jonathan P Rogers; Edward Chesney; Dominic Oliver; Thomas A Pollak; Philip McGuire; Paolo Fusar-Poli; Michael S Zandi; Glyn Lewis; Anthony S David
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 27.083

7.  Pulmonary Angiopathy in Severe COVID-19: Physiologic, Imaging, and Hematologic Observations.

Authors:  Brijesh V Patel; Deepa J Arachchillage; Carole A Ridge; Paolo Bianchi; James F Doyle; Benjamin Garfield; Stephane Ledot; Cliff Morgan; Maurizio Passariello; Susanna Price; Suveer Singh; Louit Thakuria; Sarah Trenfield; Richard Trimlett; Christine Weaver; S John Wort; Tina Xu; Simon P G Padley; Anand Devaraj; Sujal R Desai
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19.

Authors:  Angelo Carfì; Roberto Bernabei; Francesco Landi
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Receipt of Recovery-Oriented Care Practices During Hospitalization for Sepsis.

Authors:  Megan A Watson; Clare Anderson; Kevin J Karlic; Cainnear K Hogan; Sarah Seelye; Stephanie P Taylor; Hallie C Prescott
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-09-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.