| Literature DB >> 36118770 |
Pradeep Kumar Patel1, Shahida Anusha Siddiqui2,3, Kamil Kuča4,5, Santanu Sabhapondit6, Rupak Sarma1, Boby Gogoi1, Shobhit Kumar Singh1, Ranjeet Kumar Bordoloi1, Jayanta Kumar Saikia1, Romen Chandra Gogoi7, Kanchan Bhardwaj8, Jie Yang9, Yang Tao10, Sivakumar Manickam11, Buddhadeb Das12.
Abstract
Finding promising purple tea germplasm that would target new tea products for diversification and value addition boost the tea industry's economic growth. Accordingly, 10 tea germplasm viz. TRA St. 817, TRA St. 293, TRA St. 400, TRA 177/3, TRA 376/2, TRA 376/3, TRA 427/7, TRA P7, TRA P8, and TV1 were evaluated in terms of gas exchange parameters, multiplication performance, and biochemical markers such as chlorophyll, carotenoids, and anthocyanin content, which are related to the purple tea quality. The investigated gas exchange and biochemical parameters revealed significant differences. Germplasm TRA St.817 was physiologically more efficient (24.7 μmol m-2 s-1), followed by TRA St. 293, exhibiting the highest net photosynthesis, water use efficiency (19.02 μmol mmol-1), carboxylation efficiency (0.73), chlorophyll fluorescence or photochemical efficiency of PSII (0.754) and mesophyll efficiency (ci/gs ratio: 2.54). Net photosynthesis was positively correlated with water use efficiency, carboxylation efficiency, mesophyll efficiency, and photochemical efficiency of PSII (r = 0.965**, 0.937**, 0.857**, 0.867**; P = 0.05), respectively, but negatively correlated with the transpiration ratio (r = -0.878**; P = 0.05) based on Pearson correlation analysis. The total anthocyanin content (4764.19 μg.g-1 fresh leaf weight) and carotenoid content (3.825 mg.g-1 fresh leaf weight) were highest in the TRA St.817 germplasm, followed by germplasm TRA St. 293 (2926.18 μg.g-1 FW). In contrast, total chlorophyll content was significantly low (1.779 mg.g-1 fresh weight), which is very suitable for manufacturing purple tea. The highest carotenoid concentration in TRA St. 817 was 3.825 mg.g-1 FW, followed by TRA P8 (3.475 mg.g-1 FW), favoring the formation of more volatile flavor constituents. The promising germplasm, TRA St 817, has a multiplication success rate of 91.4% through cleft grafting. The outcome reveals that TRA St.817 is a promising germplasm that can be used to make speciality teas, i.e., purple tea.Entities:
Keywords: anthocyanin; carotenoids; cleft grafting; diversification; germplasm; net photosynthesis; purple tea
Year: 2022 PMID: 36118770 PMCID: PMC9471081 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.990529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1Physiological responses of tea germplasm with respect to (A) light (PAR), (B) net photosynthesis (Pn), (C) stomatal conductance (Gs), (D) evaporation (E), (E) leaf temperature (Lt), (F) carboxylation efficiency (ci/ca), (G) chlorophyll fluorescence (fv/fm), (H) mesophyll efficiency (ME), (I) water-use efficiency (WUE). Vertical bars indicate the standard error of means.
FIGURE 2Correlation coefficients (r) among gas exchange, photochemical efficiency of PSII and mesophyll efficiency parameters of selected germplasm. Where: PAR, Photosynthetic Active Radiation; PN, Net Photosynthesis; EVAP, Transpiration; GS, Stomatal Conductance; TL, leaf temperature; WUE, Water Use Efficiency; CI/CA, Carboxylation efficiency; PSII, Photochemical efficiency of PSII; and ME, Mesophyll efficiency.
Anthocyanidin concentrations (μgg–1 fresh weight) in green leaf and purple leaf colored clones.
| Selections | Cyanidin 3-O- glucoside | Cyanidin-3-O-galactoside | Peonidin chloride | Cyanidin chloride | Pelargonidin chloride | Malvidin chloride | Total anthocyanin |
|
| |||||||
| TV1 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
|
| |||||||
| TRA St 817 | 222.64 ± 38.46a | 82.98 ± 11.66a | 12.06 ± 0.69ab | 1650.86 ± 555.10a | 912.80 ± 184.34ab | 1911.30 ± 424.16a | 4792.64 ± 80.89a |
| TRA St.293 | 27.01 ± 0.74b | 527.52 ± 39.02a | 8.46 ± 1.48bc | 141.07 ± 31.09a | 1075.92 ± 112.49a | 1146.20 ± 220.16a | 2926.18 ± 403.50b |
| TRA St.400 | 15.40 ± 4.93b | 34.78 ± 13.87a | 4.84 ± 0.15cd | 134.65 ± 2.13a | 369.90 ± 60.22bc | 429.05 ± 69.33a | 988.62 ± 136.21cd |
| TRA 177/3 | 52.57 ± 14.99b | 202.28 ± 24.8a | 7.82 ± 0.37bc | 121.08 ± 18.16a | 351.15 ± 11.41c | 945.17 ± 297.09a | 1680.08 ± 344.01bcd |
| TRA 376/2 | 22.82 ± 0.46b | 254.89 ± 44.42a | 6.18 ± 0.38c | 124.49 ± 1.75a | 280.22 ± 19.87c | 901.83 ± 24.83a | 1590.43 ± 46.78b |
| TRA 376/3 | 17.40 ± 1.23b | 275.52 ± 4.78a | 4.85 ± 0.53cd | 168.62 ± 0.78a | 148.45 ± 16.50c | 664.86 ± 66.91a | 1279.69 ± 77.16bcd |
| TRA 427/7 | 14.61 ± 0.12b | 81.78 ± 27.37a | 7.87 ± 0.04bc | 86.01 ± 9.27a | 169.00 ± 4.63c | 794.35 ± 62.41a | 1153.62 ± 39.58cd |
| TRA P7 | 15.09 ± 0.12b | 360.27 ± 113.67a | 14.82 ± 0.72a | 86.97 ± 19.63a | 81.39 ± 12.72c | 1330.63 ± 156.48a | 1889.18 ± 74.32cd |
| TRA P8 | 4.17 ± 0.18b | 164.88 ± 58.76a | 8.20 ± 1.48bc | 221.22 ± 41.44a | 123.18 ± 49.14c | 1123.72 ± 393.10a | 1645.38 ± 461.22d |
Values are Mean ± Standard error of the mean (SEm). Different parameters were analyzed using ANOVA to detect a significant difference between means. Means were compared using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at P < 0.05. Mean of the same alphabets in columns are not significant.
FIGURE 3Correlation coefficients (r) between major groups of anthocyanin pigments of selected germplasm.
Catechin and caffeine content (%) in green and purple colored leaves of tea germplasm.
| Selections | Caffeine | EGC | + C | EC | EGCG | ECG | Total catechin |
| TV1 | 4.59 ± 0.12ab | 2.46 ± 0.05bc | 0.70 ± 0.05b | 1.31 ± 0.03cd | 7.23 ± 0.36c | 4.60 ± 0.02a | 16.28 ± 0.50b |
| TRA St 817 | 2.17 ± 0.29de | 1.18 ± 0.05d | 0.39 ± 0.02bc | 0.19 ± 0.01f | 5.71 ± 0.16d | 0.30 ± 0.01h | 7.77 ± 0.23f |
| TRA St.293 | 3.36 ± 0.13c | 2.68 ± 0.09abc | ND | 1.55 ± 0.12bc | 4.01 ± 0.68e | 2.37 ± 0.08c | 10.61 ± 0.39d |
| TRA St.400 | 3.63 ± 0.49c | 2.68 ± 0.21abc | 1.10 ± 0.33a | 1.31 ± 0.05cd | 4.81 ± 0.16de | 3.82 ± 0.06b | 13.72 ± 0.17c |
| TRA 177/3 | 3.02 ± 0.32cd | 3.51 ± 0.71a | 0.08 ± 0.01cd | 1.29 ± 0.04cd | 6.90 ± 0.32c | 2.10 ± 0.01d | 13.88 ± 0.42c |
| TRA 376/2 | 4.81 ± 0.31a | 2.78 ± 0.10ab | ND | 1.13 ± 0.01d | 8.48 ± 0.03b | 1.68 ± 0.01f | 14.07 ± 0.13c |
| TRA 376/3 | 2.32 ± 0.79de | 2.16 ± 0.40bcd | 0.08 ± 0.01cd | 0.88 ± 0.13cd | 4.91 ± 0.10de | 1.52 ± 0.04g | 9.55 ± 0.34e |
| TRA 427/7 | 3.79 ± 0.30bc | 2.74 ± 0.08ab | ND | 1.40 ± 0.04 | 7.03 ± 0.17c | 1.84 ± 0.08e | 13.01 ± 0.21c |
| TRA P7 | 0.59 ± 0.04f | 1.71 ± 0.05cd | 0.19 ± 0.07cd | 1.87 ± 0.01ab | 12.39 ± 0.41a | 0.19 ± 0.03h | 16.34 ± 0.43b |
| TRA P8 | 1.46 ± 0.04ef | 2.08 ± 0.01bcd | 0.15 ± 0.03cd | 2.16 ± 0.27a | 12.69 ± 0.14a | 0.31 ± 0.02h | 17.38 ± 0.14a |
Values are Mean ± Standard error (SEm). Different parameters were analyzed using ANOVA to detect a significant difference between means. Means were compared using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at P < 0.05. Mean of the same alphabets in columns are not significant. ND-Not detected.
The values of EGC, + C, EC, EGCG, ECG, and Total Catechin are on a% dry mass basis.
EGC, Epigallo catechin; + C, Catechin; EC, Epicatechin; EGCG, Epigallo catechin gallate; ECG, Epicatechin gallate.
ND, Not detected.
Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a/b ratio, total chlorophyll, carotenoids and chlorophyll/carotenoids ratio in the selected tea germplasm.
| Selections | Chlorophyll “a” (mg g–1FW) | Chlorophyll “b” (mg g–1FW) | Chlorophyll “a/b” | Carotenoid (mg g–1FW) | Total chlorophyll (mg g–1FW) | Chlorophyll/carotenoid |
| TV1 | 2.011 ± 0.025a | 0.821 ± 0.067a | 2.741 ± 0.145a | 3.080 ± 0.148a | 2.832 ± 0.042bc | 0.939 ± 0.037bc |
| TRA St 817 | 1.188 ± 0.014c | 0.590 ± 0.019a | 2.159 ± 0.088a | 3.825 ± 0.055a | 1.779 ± 0.004e | 0.504 ± 0.018d |
| TRA St.293 | 1.738 ± 0.056b | 0.626 ± 0.012a | 2.812 ± 0.169a | 3.125 ± 0.085a | 2.364 ± 0.044d | 0.826 ± 0.028c |
| TRA St.400 | 2.035 ± 0.030a | 0.961 ± 0.016a | 2.121 ± 0.005a | 2.493 ± 0.001a | 2.996 ± 0.046ab | 1.211 ± 0.015ab |
| TRA 177/3 | 2.018 ± 0.015a | 0.930 ± 0.011a | 2.173 ± 0.010a | 3.043 ± 0.223a | 2.947 ± 0.026ab | 1.083 ± 0.059abc |
| TRA 376/2 | 1.780 ± 0.029b | 0.857 ± 0.014a | 2.089 ± 0.064a | 3.131 ± 0.284a | 2.637 ± 0.015c | 0.953 ± 0.090bc |
| TRA 376/3 | 1.929 ± 0.020ab | 0.864 ± 0.009a | 2.231 ± 0.002a | 2.440 ± 0.025a | 2.793 ± 0.029bc | 1.148 ± 0.000ab |
| TRA 427/7 | 1.939 ± 0.014ab | 0.870 ± 0.006a | 2.230 ± 0.000a | 2.743 ± 0.008a | 2.809 ± 0.020bc | 1.033 ± 0.000abc |
| TRA P7 | 1.989 ± 0.035a | 0.913 ± 0.027a | 2.184 ± 0.027a | 2.335 ± 0.098a | 2.901 ± 0.062b | 1.249 ± 0.025a |
| TRA P8 | 2.077 ± 0.017a | 1.106 ± 0.038a | 1.893 ± 0.082a | 3.475 ± 0.051a | 3.183 ± 0.021a | 0.931 ± 0.002bc |
Values are Mean ± Standard error of the mean (SEm). Different parameters were analyzed using ANOVA to detect a significant difference between means. Means were compared using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at P < 0.05. Mean of the same alphabets in columns are not significant. FW - Fresh weight.
FIGURE 4Correlation coefficients (r) between chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments of selected germplasm. Where: Chl a, chlorophyll a; Chl b, chlorophyll b; Car, carotenoid, chl a/b, chlorophyll a/chlorophyll b ratio; total chl, total chlorophyll; chl/car, chlorophyll/carotenoids ratio.
Taster’s evaluation of promising purple tea germplasm TRA St.817.
| Flush | Brightness | Briskness | Strength | Flavor/aroma | Quality |
| First flush | 5.7 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| Second flush | 6.0 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Rain flush | 4.8 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 4.8 |
| Autumn flush | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 6.0 |
Mean of 3 samples/flush in a 10-point scale.
FIGURE 5Effect of flushing on the success of grafting.