| Literature DB >> 33803722 |
Nina-Nicoleta Condurache Lazăr1, Constantin Croitoru2, Elena Enachi1, Gabriela-Elena Bahrim1, Nicoleta Stănciuc1, Gabriela Râpeanu1.
Abstract
This study aimed to use eggplant peels as a potential source of anthocyanins with biological activities. Two different extraction methods were tested in order to obtain extracts with a high anthocyanin content. The selected methods were the solid-liquid extraction (SLE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) methods. For each method, two concentrations of ethanol (EtOH) were used, while varying the extraction time and temperature. Based on the results, the extracts obtained by SLE using EtOH 96% after 30 min of extraction at 50 °C showed the highest anthocyanin concentration. The UAE allowed the best results with EtOH 96% after 30 min at 25 °C. Both selected extracts showed similar chromatographic profiles, with delphinidin 3-O-rutinoside as the major anthocyanin, but in a higher concentration in UAE. The extracts also presented inhibitory activity against lipoxygenase (LOX), lipase, and α-amylase, thus suggesting a possible involvement in reducing the risk of various disorders. The first order kinetic model was used to predict the changes that can occur in the anthocyanin content and antioxidant activity from the eggplant peel extract. The calculated kinetic and thermodynamic parameters confirm the irreversible degradation of phytochemicals.Entities:
Keywords: anthocyanins; bioactive compounds; biological activity; eggplant peels; extraction methods; thermal degradation
Year: 2021 PMID: 33803722 PMCID: PMC8003047 DOI: 10.3390/plants10030577
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The total anthocyanin content (TAC) and antioxidant activity of the extracts obtained with solid–liquid extraction (SLE) and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) methods by varying the extraction parameters.
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
| SLE | 30 | 0.84 ± 0.05 a*1◌ | 1.01 ± 0.08 a#1◌ | 0.93 ± 0.06 a*2◌ | 1.11 ± 0.08 a#1◌ |
| 60 | 0.84 ± 0.07 a*1 | 0.96 ± 0.09 a#1 | 0.92 ± 0.09 a*1 | 1.13 ± 0.10 a#2 | |
| 120 | 0.87 ± 0.03 a*1 | 1.02 ± 0.09 a#1 | 1.01 ± 0.10 a*2 | 1.06 ± 0.06 a#1 | |
| UAE | 15 | 0.91 ± 0.08 A*1 | 0.87 ± 0.05 A*1 | 0.98 ± 0.09 A*1 | 0.79 ± 0.07 A#2● |
| 30 | 0.90 ± 0.08 A*1◌ | 0.93 ± 0.09 A*1◌ | 1.04 ± 0.10 A*2◌ | 0.75 ± 0.07 A#2 | |
| 45 | 0.94 ± 0.09 A*1 | 0.90 ± 0.08 A*1 | 0.97 ± 0.07 A*1 | 0.95 ± 0.09 B*1 | |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| ||
| SLE | 30 | 25.34 ± 1.88 a*1◌ | 39.36 ± 2.87 a#1◌ | 31.89 ± 3.02 a*2◌ | 34.92 ± 3.41 a*2◌ |
| 60 | 28.80 ± 2.42 b*1 | 39.85 ± 3.19 a#1 | 30.96 ± 2.81 a*1 | 38.97 ± 1.75 b#1 | |
| 120 | 27.67 ± 1.35 ab*1 | 38.17 ± 3.47 a# | 29.75 ± 2.04 a*1 | 32.61 ± 2.5a*2 | |
| UAE | 15 | 34.31 ± 0.42 A*1 | 32.10 ± 1.99 A*1 | 22.46 ± 1.01 A*2 | 32.64 ± 2.44 A#1 |
| 30 | 32.74 ± 0.38 B*1◌ | 33.54 ± 0.63 A#1◌ | 20.64 ± 1.93 A*2◌ | 32.86 ± 1.76 A#1● | |
| 45 | 32.59 ± 0.76 B*1 | 32.10 ± 1.99 A*1 | 21.69 ± 0.99 A*2 | 32.65 ± 1.34 A#1 | |
The influence of extraction time was highlighted using lowercase and uppercase letters for SLE and UAE, respectively, in a column. The influence of extraction temperature and solvent concentration was highlighted using symbols (*, #) and digits, respectively, in lines. The differences between the extraction methods were highlighted using symbols (◌, ●) in a column. Values that share a letter/symbol/digit are not significantly different (p > 0.05). TAC = total anthocyanin content; EtOH = ethanol; t = time; D3G = delphinidin 3-O-glucoside; TE = Trolox Equivalent; dw = dry weight.
Figure 1Chromatographic profile of eggplant peel extracts obtained by SLE with EtOH 96% for 30 min at 50 °C (a) and UAE with EtOH 96% for 30 min at 25 °C (b): Peak 1—delphinidin 3-O-rutinoside-5-glucoside; Peak 2—delphinidin 3-O-glucoside; Peak 3—delphinidin 3-O-rutinoside; Peak 4—cyanidin 3-O-rutinoside; Peak 5—petunidin 3-O-rutinoside.
Figure 2Chemical structure of the anthocyanin glycosides identified in the eggplant peel extracts: delphinidin 3-O-rutinoside-5-glucoside (a); delphinidin 3-O-glucoside (b); delphinidin 3-O-rutinoside (c); cyanidin 3-O-rutinoside (d), and petunidin 3-O-rutinoside (e). [26].
The enzyme inhibition percentage of SLE and UAE selected extracts and positive controls in LOX, lipase, and α-amylase enzymes at different concentrations.
| Sample Concentration, mg/mL | LOX | Lipase | α-Amylase | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLE | 1 | 50.87 ± 0.84 a | 25.35 ± 0.35 a | 58.58 ± 2.09 a |
| 0.5 | 49.52 ± 0.35 d | 23.31 ± 1.22 c | 56.73 ± 1.36 bc | |
| 0.1 | 46.59 ± 1.81 g | 22.29 ± 093 e | 47.51 ± 1.22 d | |
| UAE | 1 | 53.64 ± 0.45 b | 26.25 ± 1.04 a | 58.02 ± 1.01 a |
| 0.5 | 52.95 ± 0.75 e | 25.34 ± 0.68 c | 54.26 ± 1.57 c | |
| 0.1 | 49.13 ± 3.38 g | 24.42 ± 1.72 e | 48.50 ± 2.89 d | |
| Quercetin | 1 | 84.98 ± 3.28 c | - | - |
| 0.5 | 79.37 ± 0.60 f | - | - | |
| 0.1 | 77.32 ± 1.20 h | - | - | |
| Orlistat | 1 | - | 34.70 ± 2.59 b | - |
| 0.5 | - | 32.19 ± 0.68 d | - | |
| 0.1 | - | 30.82 ± 0.68 f | - | |
| Metformin hydrochloride | 1 | - | - | 60.68 ± 0.83 a |
| 0.5 | - | - | 58.91 ± 1.57 b | |
| 0.1 | - | - | 56.36 ± 1.01 e | |
Values from a column for a similar concentration that share a letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). Measurements are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicates. SLE—solid/liquid conventional extraction; UAE—ultrasound-assisted extraction; LOX—lipoxygenase.
The enzyme inhibition results (IC50 values; μg/mL) of SLE and UAE selected extracts in LOX, lipase, and α-amylase enzymes.
| Sample | IC50 (μg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| LOX | Lipase | α-amylase | |
| SLE | 2.80 ± 0.68 a | 3.31 ± 0.24 a | 10.72 ± 1.06 a |
| UAE | 2.83 ± 0.44 a | 2.59 ± 0.24 a | 7.27 ± 0.23 b |
| Quercetin | 7.81 ± 0.66 b | - | - |
| Orlistat | - | 1.23 ± 0.09 b | - |
| Metformin hydrochloride | - | - | 4.31 ± 0.48 c |
| SLE | 2.80 ± 0.68 a | 3.31 ± 0.24 a | 10.72 ± 1.06 a |
Values from a column that share a letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). Measurements are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicates. SLE—solid/liquid conventional extract; UAE—ultrasound-assisted extract; LOX-lipoxygenase.
Figure 3Degradation of total anthocyanin content—TAC (a) and antioxidant activity (b) in eggplant peel extract treated at different temperatures; D3G = delphinidin 3-O-glucoside; TE = Trolox Equivalent; dw—dry weight.
Estimated kinetic parameters of bioactives in eggplant peel extract.
| Compounds | T, °C | K × 102, min−1 | R2 | t1/2, min | Ea, kJ/mol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAC | 80 | 0.74 ± 0.001 | 0.87 | 93.67 ±1.05 | 34.63 ± 3.59 |
| 90 | 0.79 ± 0.004 | 0.90 | 87.74 ± 0.78 | ||
| 100 | 1.53 ± 0.002 | 0.97 | 45.30 ± 0.44 | ||
| 110 | 1.59 ± 0.001 | 0.94 | 43.59 ± 4.84 | ||
| 120 | 2.42 ± 0.003 | 0.94 | 28.64 ± 0.33 | ||
| 130 | 2.91 ± 0.01 | 0.99 | 23.82 ± 0.71 | ||
| Antioxidant activity | 80 | 0.10 ± 0.001 | 0.95 | 693.14 ± 4.87 | 37.24 ± 3.24 |
| 90 | 0.08 ± 0.001 | 0.86 | 866.43 ± 4.76 | ||
| 100 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.86 | 433.21 ± 5.21 | ||
| 110 | 0.22 ± 0.001 | 0.89 | 315.06 ± 3.50 | ||
| 120 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | 0.92 | 223.59 ± 1.51 | ||
| 130 | 0.38 ± 0.001 | 0.91 | 182.40 ± 1.46 |
TAC—total anthocyanin content; k—the degradation rate constant; t1/2—the half-life of degradation; Ea—the activation energies; R2—determination coefficient; T—temperature.
Thermodynamic parameters obtained for phytochemical degradation in eggplant peel extract.
| Compounds | T, °C | ΔH, kJ/mol | ΔG, kJ/mol | ΔS, J·mol−1·K−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAC | 80 | 31.69 ± 1.03 | 113.36 ± 9.56 | −231.34 ± 11.05 |
| 90 | 31.61 ± 0.40 | 116.46 ± 11.61 | −233.74 ± 18.80 | |
| 100 | 31.53 ± 1.20 | 117.70 ± 10.98 | −231.08 ± 15.21 | |
| 110 | 31.44 ± 1.10 | 120.82 ± 9.03 | −233.35 ± 11.55 | |
| 120 | 31.36 ± 3.01 | 122.68 ± 9.43 | −232.37 ± 15.13 | |
| 130 | 31.28 ± 0.10 | 125.27 ± 11.26 | −233.23 ± 17.01 | |
| Antioxidant activity | 80 | 34.30 ± 1.72 | 119.23 ± 12.68 | −240.60 ± 14.67 |
| 90 | 34.22 ± 2.01 | 123.37 ± 15.49 | −245.59 ± 14.76 | |
| 100 | 34.13 ± 1.99 | 124.70 ± 10.71 | −242.80 ± 15.82 | |
| 110 | 34.05 ± 1.53 | 127.12 ± 11.35 | −242.98 ± 13.35 | |
| 120 | 33.97 ± 1.67 | 129.40 ± 12.99 | −242.82 ± 11.01 | |
| 130 | 33.89 ± 0.91 | 132.09 ± 11.47 | −243.69 ± 11.89 |
TAC—total anthocyanin content; ΔH—activation enthalpy; ΔG—Gibbs inactivation free energy; ΔS—activation entropy; T—temperature.