Literature DB >> 36118401

A Comparative Study of Clinical Profile and Relapse Patterns in TRIPLE-NEGATIVE and Non-Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Curative Intent.

Suryanarayana V S Deo1, Nootan Kumar Shukla1, Ajay Gogia2, Daya Nand Sharma3, Ashish Jakhetiya1, Dillip Kumar Muduly1, Pankaj Kumar Garg1,4, Sandeep R Mathur5, V S Reenivas6.   

Abstract

Molecular subtyping in breast cancer is recently emerging as an important determinant of treatment and outcomes, and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been established as a distinct clinical entity with unique features and adverse outcomes. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained computerized breast cancer database was performed, and all the non-metastatic female breast cancer patients undergoing potentially curative multimodality treatment between 2005 and 2012 were included for analysis. Patients with incomplete information regarding ER, PR, and HER2/neu status were excluded. All the eligible patients were divided into TNBC and non-TNBC group based on molecular subtyping. A comparative analysis between the two groups was performed to analyze the clinical spectrum and patterns of relapse. A total of 861 patients qualified for the final analysis and the proportion of TNBC was 254 (29.5%) and non-TNBC was 607 (70.5%). Patients in the TNBC group were slightly younger than the non-TNBC group (median age 46 vs. 49, p value = 0.006). TNBC group had a higher breast conservation surgery (BCS) rate, and there was no difference in the need for chemo and radiotherapy between two groups. The overall recurrence rates were significantly higher in TNBC group compared to non-TNBC group (26.8 vs. 19.3%, p value = 0.01). Local disease recurrences were significantly higher in TNBC compared to non-TNBC (7.9 vs. 3.1%, p value = 0.002). Both the regional and systemic recurrences were higher in TNBC group compared to non-TNBC, though the difference failed to attain statistical significance (for regional recurrences 2.4 vs. 1.5%, p value = 0.36; for systemic recurrences 23.2 vs. 17.8%, p value = 0.06). The brain metastasis was significantly higher in TNBC group (6.7 vs. 3.3%, p value = 0.02). In addition, time to relapse was also significantly less in TNBC cohort (16.1 vs. 22.1 months). TNBC accounts for almost one-third of the breast cancer patients with a relatively younger age at presentation, higher volume of disease burden and high breast conservation rates. Despite a standard multimodality therapy the local, systemic, and CNS recurrence rates are high in TNBC and majority relapse within first 2 years after completion of therapy. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasm; Estrogen receptor; Her2/neu receptor; Molecular subtypes; Progesterone receptor; Recurrence

Year:  2017        PMID: 36118401      PMCID: PMC9478069          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-017-0634-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  25 in total

1.  Challenges in the treatment of breast cancer in developing countries.

Authors:  S V Suryanarayana Deo
Journal:  Natl Med J India       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.537

2.  Large standard deviation: think before you write.

Authors:  Pankaj Kumar Garg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Triple-negative breast cancer: epidemiological considerations and recommendations.

Authors:  P Boyle
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Prognostic significance of young age (<35 years) by subtype based on ER, PR, and HER2 status in breast cancer: a nationwide registry-based study.

Authors:  Eun-Kyu Kim; Woo Chul Noh; Wonshik Han; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Clinicopathological comparison of triple negative breast cancers with non-triple negative breast cancers in a hospital in North India.

Authors:  M G Nabi; A Ahangar; M A Wahid; S Kuchay
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Clinicopathological characteristics of triple negative breast cancer at a tertiary care hospital in India.

Authors:  Atika Dogra; Dinesh Chandra Doval; Manjula Sardana; Subhash Kumar Chedi; Anurag Mehta
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014

7.  Triple-negative breast cancer: An institutional analysis.

Authors:  A Gogia; V Raina; S V S Deo; N K Shukla; B K Mohanti
Journal:  Indian J Cancer       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.224

8.  Sites of distant recurrence and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: high incidence of central nervous system metastases.

Authors:  Nancy U Lin; Elizabeth Claus; Jessica Sohl; Abdul R Razzak; Amal Arnaout; Eric P Winer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Pattern of recurrence of early breast cancer is different according to intrinsic subtype and proliferation index.

Authors:  Nuria Ribelles; Lidia Perez-Villa; Jose Manuel Jerez; Bella Pajares; Luis Vicioso; Begoña Jimenez; Vanessa de Luque; Leonardo Franco; Elena Gallego; Antonia Marquez; Martina Alvarez; Alfonso Sanchez-Muñoz; Luis Perez-Rivas; Emilio Alba
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Comparison of Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis in Triple-Negative and Non-Triple Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jingdan Qiu; Xinying Xue; Chao Hu; Hu Xu; Deqiang Kou; Rong Li; Ming Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.