| Literature DB >> 26819640 |
Jingdan Qiu1, Xinying Xue2, Chao Hu3, Hu Xu1, Deqiang Kou1, Rong Li1, Ming Li3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has attracted more attention both clinically and experimentally because of its high-risk biological characteristics and lacking of effective treatment method. The purpose of this retrospective study was to find out the incidence of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in all kinds of breast cancers and to compare and analyze the clinicopathological features, recurrence, metastasis and prognosis of patients with TNBC and non-triple negative breast cancer (non-TNBC).Entities:
Keywords: Triple-negative breast cancer
Year: 2016 PMID: 26819640 PMCID: PMC4716849 DOI: 10.7150/jca.10944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
The comparison of clinicopathological features between the two groups
| Characteristics | TNBC | Non-TNBC | χ2 | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | <35 | 45 | (13.98) | 65 | (5.18) | 7.382 | 0.012 |
| ≥35 | 277 | (86.02) | 1191 | (94.82) | |||
| Menopausal status | No | 155 | (48.14) | 591 | (47.05) | 0.026 | 0.9 |
| Yes | 167 | (51.86) | 665 | (52.95) | |||
| Family history | Yes | 37 | (11.49) | 57 | (4.54) | 5.273 | 0.031 |
| No | 285 | (88.51) | 1199 | (95.46) | |||
| Tumor size | ≥5cm | 41 | (12.73) | 69 | (5.49) | 4.937 | 0.044 |
| <5cm | 281 | (87.27) | 1187 | (94.51) | |||
| Lymphatic invasion | Yes | 208 | (64.60) | 603 | (48.01) | 6.857 | 0.011 |
| No | 114 | (35.40) | 653 | (51.99) | |||
| Clinical stage | Ⅲ | 90 | (27.95) | 179 | (14.25) | 8.175 | 0.007 |
| Ⅰ+Ⅱ | 232 | (72.05) | 1077 | (85.75) | |||
| Histologic grade | Ⅲ | 69 | (21.43) | 147 | (11.70) | 5.141 | 0.028 |
| Ⅰ+Ⅱ | 253 | (78.57) | 1109 | (88.30) | |||
| Pathological type | Ductal invasive | 204 | (63.35) | 860 | (68.47) | 0.779 | 0.420 |
| Other | 118 | (36.65) | 396 | (31.53) | |||
| Surgical treatment | Modified radical mastectomy | 273 | (84.78) | 1077 | (85.75) | 0.042 | 0.858 |
| Other | 49 | (15.22) | 179 | (14.25) | |||
The comparison of recurrence and metastasis between the two groups
| Local recurrence or distant metastasis | TNBC | Non-TNBC | χ2 | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local recurrence | 24 | (7.45) | 29 | (2.31) | 5.486 | 0.031 |
| distant metastasis | 66 | (20.50) | 139 | (11.07) | 4.745 | 0.038 |
| Metastatic site | N=66 | N=139 | ||||
| Lungs | 33 | (50.0) | 25 | (17.98) | 5.649 | 0.040 |
| Bones | 4 | (6.06) | 86 | (61.87) | 23.635 | <0.001 |
| Liver | 17 | (25.76) | 20 | (14.39) | 5.882 | 0.031 |
| Brain | 12 | (18.18) | 8 | (5.76) | 6.782 | 0.029 |
Figure 1Comparison of DFS between TNBC group and non- TNBC group. During the period of observation 90 patients occurred recurrence or metastasis in TNBC group and 168 patients in the non-TNBC group. The 5-years DFS was 72.05% (232/322) which differed significantly (p=0.003) compared to the rate in non-TNBC group were 86.62% (1088/1256). The 5-years DFS was significantly lower in TNBC group than those in non-TNBC group.
Figure 2Comparison of OS between TNBC group and non- TNBC group. During the period of observation 37 patients died from breast cancer in TNBC group and 57 patients in the non-TNBC group. The 5-years OS was 88.51% (285/322) which differed significantly (p=0.031) compared to the rate in non-TNBC group was 95.46% (1199/1256). The 5-years OS was significantly lower in TNBC group than those in non-TNBC group.
The univariate analysis that influencing the prognosis (DFS and OS) of TNBC
| Characteristics | No. | 5-year DFS | χ2 | P | 5-year OS | χ2 | P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | <35 | 45 | 26 | (57.78) | 129.317 | <0.001 | 38 | (84.44) | 2.397 | 0.122 |
| ≥35 | 277 | 219 | (79.06) | 244 | (88.09) | |||||
| Menopausal status | No | 155 | 121 | (78.06) | 1.131 | 0.288 | 137 | (87.74) | 0.923 | 0.337 |
| Yes | 167 | 123 | (73.65) | 143 | (85.63) | |||||
| Family history | Yes | 37 | 29 | (78.38) | 0.156 | 0.693 | 33 | (89.19) | 1.229 | 0.268 |
| No | 285 | 240 | (84.21) | 270 | (94.74) | |||||
| Tumor size | ≥5cm | 41 | 25 | (60.96) | 7.664 | 0.006 | 29 | (70.73) | 4.649 | 0.031 |
| <5cm | 281 | 224 | (79.71) | 255 | (90.75) | |||||
| Lymphatic invasion | Positive | 208 | 135 | (64.90) | 6.460 | 0.011 | 175 | (84.13) | 7.093 | 0.008 |
| Negative | 114 | 107 | (93.86) | 107 | (93.86) | |||||
| Clinical stage | Ⅲ | 90 | 55 | (61.11) | 7.047 | 0.008 | 68 | (7556) | 6.393 | 0.011 |
| I+II | 232 | 190 | (81.90) | 213 | (91.81) | |||||
| Histologic grade | Ⅲ | 69 | 47 | (68.12) | 6.152 | 0.013 | 59 | (85.50) | 0.018 | 0.894 |
| I+II | 253 | 201 | (79.45) | 225 | (88.93) | |||||
| Pathological type | Ductal invasive | 204 | 147 | (72.06) | 4.350 | 0.037 | 172 | (84.31) | 1.472 | 0.225 |
| Other | 118 | 97 | (82.20) | 108 | (91.53) | |||||
| Surgical treatment | MRM | 273 | 233 | (85.35) | 4.017 | 0.045 | 236 | (86.45) | 2.072 | 0.150 |
| Other | 49 | 41 | (83.67) | 42 | (85.71) | |||||
The multivariate Logistic regression analysis that influencing the DFS and OS of TNBC
| Factor | Prognostic index | B | SE | Sig. | Exp(B) | 95.0% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| Age | DFS | -1.784 | .582 | .002 | .168 | .054 | .525 |
| lymph node status | DFS | 2.910 | 1.039 | .005 | 18.358 | 2.395 | 140.735 |
| histological grade | DFS | .906 | .459 | .049 | 2.475 | 1.006 | 6.088 |
| Age | OS | -2.964 | .684 | <.001 | .052 | .014 | .197 |
| lymph node status | OS | 2.033 | 1.065 | .046 | 7.635 | .947 | 61.570 |