Carlos Maia Dias1,2, Sérgio B Gonçalves3, António Completo4, Manuel Ribeiro da Silva5, Clara de Campos Azevedo6,7,8,9, Jorge Mineiro10, Frederico Ferreira11, João Folgado3. 1. Department of Bioengineering, and iBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. carlosmaiadias@gmail.com. 2. Hospital CUF Tejo, Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Lisbon, Portugal. carlosmaiadias@gmail.com. 3. IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. 4. TEMA, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Aveiro (UA), Aveiro, Portugal. 5. Hospital CUF Porto, Porto, Portugal. 6. Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, Portugal. 7. ICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal. 8. Hospital CUF Tejo, Elbow and Shoulder Unit, Lisbon, PT, Portugal. 9. Hospital Dos SAMS de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. 10. Hospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal. 11. Department of Bioengineering, and iBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Little is known about the direct influence of different technical options at the rotator cuff tendon-bone interface (TBI) and, more specifically, at the medial bearing row (MBR), regarding local contact force, area and pressure. We evaluated the mechanical repercussions of different medial row anchor configurations for that setting using different values of tension in the lateral row anchors. METHODS: Knotless transosseous equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repairs with locked versus nonlocked medial anchors and single versus double-hole suture passage were tested in a synthetic rotator cuff mechanical model, using 2 different values of lateral row tension. Contact force, area, pressure, peak force and MBR force were compared at the simulated TBI using a pressure mapping sensor. RESULTS: When compared to locked anchors, medial row sliding configurations generate lower values for all the above-mentioned parameters. The use of double-hole suture passage in the medial cuff generated slightly higher values contact area regardless of lateral row tension. At higher lateral row tension values, lower values of the remaining parameters, including MBR force, were found when compared to single-hole suture passage. Lateral row anchor tension increase induced an increase of all parameters regardless of the medial row configuration and TBI contact force and MBR force were the most susceptible parameters, regardless of the medial row pattern. CONCLUSION: Medial row mechanism, suture configuration and lateral row tension interfere with the mechanical force, area and pressure at by TBI. Lateral row tension increase is a major influencer in those parameters. These results can help surgeons choose the right technique considering its mechanical effect at the TBI.
PURPOSE: Little is known about the direct influence of different technical options at the rotator cuff tendon-bone interface (TBI) and, more specifically, at the medial bearing row (MBR), regarding local contact force, area and pressure. We evaluated the mechanical repercussions of different medial row anchor configurations for that setting using different values of tension in the lateral row anchors. METHODS: Knotless transosseous equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repairs with locked versus nonlocked medial anchors and single versus double-hole suture passage were tested in a synthetic rotator cuff mechanical model, using 2 different values of lateral row tension. Contact force, area, pressure, peak force and MBR force were compared at the simulated TBI using a pressure mapping sensor. RESULTS: When compared to locked anchors, medial row sliding configurations generate lower values for all the above-mentioned parameters. The use of double-hole suture passage in the medial cuff generated slightly higher values contact area regardless of lateral row tension. At higher lateral row tension values, lower values of the remaining parameters, including MBR force, were found when compared to single-hole suture passage. Lateral row anchor tension increase induced an increase of all parameters regardless of the medial row configuration and TBI contact force and MBR force were the most susceptible parameters, regardless of the medial row pattern. CONCLUSION: Medial row mechanism, suture configuration and lateral row tension interfere with the mechanical force, area and pressure at by TBI. Lateral row tension increase is a major influencer in those parameters. These results can help surgeons choose the right technique considering its mechanical effect at the TBI.
Authors: Leesa M Galatz; Craig M Ball; Sharlene A Teefey; William D Middleton; Ken Yamaguchi Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Johnathan F Williams; Shaan S Patel; Dustin K Baker; Joseph M Schwertz; Gerald McGwin; Brent A Ponce Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Ekaterina Urch; Charles C Lin; Yasuo Itami; Nilay A Patel; Michelle H McGarry; Orr Limpisvasti; Thay Q Lee Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 6.202