Kihwan Choi1, Jong Eun Park2, Anhye Kim3, Sojung Hwang4, Jinkun Bae1, Tae Gun Shin2, Kyuseok Kim1. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea. 4. Global Clinical Trials Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Steroids are used in cases of sepsis, especially in patients experiencing septic shock. However, clinical trials to date have reported contradictory results. Different patient endotypes and variations in the type and dose of steroid may be at fault for this discrepancy, and further investigation is warranted. In this paper, we propose a new DEXA-SEPSIS study design. METHODS: We plan to conduct a multicenter, double-blinded randomized pilot study (DEXA-SEPSIS) investigating the feasibility and safety of early use of dexamethasone in sepsis. Participants will be high-risk septic patients presenting to the emergency department with a systolic blood pressure of <90 mmHg or serum lactate level of >2 mmol/L. Participants will be randomized to the following three groups: control, 0.1 mg/kg of dexamethasone, or 0.2 mg/kg of dexamethasone per day for 1 to 2 days. The primary outcome will be 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes will include time to septic shock, shock reversal, additional steroid administration, number of ventilator-free days, use of continuous renal-replacement therapy, length of stay in the intensive care unit and/or hospital, delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score on days 3 and 7, superinfection, gastrointestinal bleeding, hypernatremia, and hyperglycemia. DISCUSSION: The DEXA-SEPSIS study will provide insight regarding the feasibility and safety of early use of dexamethasone in high-risk sepsis. The results could provide data to design a future phase III study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05136560.
OBJECTIVE: Steroids are used in cases of sepsis, especially in patients experiencing septic shock. However, clinical trials to date have reported contradictory results. Different patient endotypes and variations in the type and dose of steroid may be at fault for this discrepancy, and further investigation is warranted. In this paper, we propose a new DEXA-SEPSIS study design. METHODS: We plan to conduct a multicenter, double-blinded randomized pilot study (DEXA-SEPSIS) investigating the feasibility and safety of early use of dexamethasone in sepsis. Participants will be high-risk septic patients presenting to the emergency department with a systolic blood pressure of <90 mmHg or serum lactate level of >2 mmol/L. Participants will be randomized to the following three groups: control, 0.1 mg/kg of dexamethasone, or 0.2 mg/kg of dexamethasone per day for 1 to 2 days. The primary outcome will be 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes will include time to septic shock, shock reversal, additional steroid administration, number of ventilator-free days, use of continuous renal-replacement therapy, length of stay in the intensive care unit and/or hospital, delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score on days 3 and 7, superinfection, gastrointestinal bleeding, hypernatremia, and hyperglycemia. DISCUSSION: The DEXA-SEPSIS study will provide insight regarding the feasibility and safety of early use of dexamethasone in high-risk sepsis. The results could provide data to design a future phase III study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05136560.
Authors: Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Konrad Reinhart; Ron Daniels; Niranjan Kissoon; Flavia R Machado; Raymond D Schachter; Simon Finfer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Balasubramanian Venkatesh; Simon Finfer; Jeremy Cohen; Dorrilyn Rajbhandari; Yaseen Arabi; Rinaldo Bellomo; Laurent Billot; Maryam Correa; Parisa Glass; Meg Harward; Christopher Joyce; Qiang Li; Colin McArthur; Anders Perner; Andrew Rhodes; Kelly Thompson; Steve Webb; John Myburgh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jean-Louis Vincent; Yasser Sakr; Mervyn Singer; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Flavia R Machado; John C Marshall; Simon Finfer; Paolo Pelosi; Luca Brazzi; Dita Aditianingsih; Jean-François Timsit; Bin Du; Xavier Wittebole; Jan Máca; Santhana Kannan; Luis A Gorordo-Delsol; Jan J De Waele; Yatin Mehta; Marc J M Bonten; Ashish K Khanna; Marin Kollef; Mariesa Human; Derek C Angus Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 56.272