Literature DB >> 29347874

Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock.

Balasubramanian Venkatesh1, Simon Finfer1, Jeremy Cohen1, Dorrilyn Rajbhandari1, Yaseen Arabi1, Rinaldo Bellomo1, Laurent Billot1, Maryam Correa1, Parisa Glass1, Meg Harward1, Christopher Joyce1, Qiang Li1, Colin McArthur1, Anders Perner1, Andrew Rhodes1, Kelly Thompson1, Steve Webb1, John Myburgh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether hydrocortisone reduces mortality among patients with septic shock is unclear.
METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with septic shock who were undergoing mechanical ventilation to receive hydrocortisone (at a dose of 200 mg per day) or placebo for 7 days or until death or discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU), whichever came first. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 90 days.
RESULTS: From March 2013 through April 2017, a total of 3800 patients underwent randomization. Status with respect to the primary outcome was ascertained in 3658 patients (1832 of whom had been assigned to the hydrocortisone group and 1826 to the placebo group). At 90 days, 511 patients (27.9%) in the hydrocortisone group and 526 (28.8%) in the placebo group had died (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.10; P=0.50). The effect of the trial regimen was similar in six prespecified subgroups. Patients who had been assigned to receive hydrocortisone had faster resolution of shock than those assigned to the placebo group (median duration, 3 days [interquartile range, 2 to 5] vs. 4 days [interquartile range, 2 to 9]; hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.41; P<0.001). Patients in the hydrocortisone group had a shorter duration of the initial episode of mechanical ventilation than those in the placebo group (median, 6 days [interquartile range, 3 to 18] vs. 7 days [interquartile range, 3 to 24]; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.22; P<0.001), but taking into account episodes of recurrence of ventilation, there were no significant differences in the number of days alive and free from mechanical ventilation. Fewer patients in the hydrocortisone group than in the placebo group received a blood transfusion (37.0% vs. 41.7%; odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94; P=0.004). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to mortality at 28 days, the rate of recurrence of shock, the number of days alive and out of the ICU, the number of days alive and out of the hospital, the recurrence of mechanical ventilation, the rate of renal-replacement therapy, and the incidence of new-onset bacteremia or fungemia.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with septic shock undergoing mechanical ventilation, a continuous infusion of hydrocortisone did not result in lower 90-day mortality than placebo. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and others; ADRENAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01448109 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29347874     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  185 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in immunocompetent patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Xin Lu; Wei Han; Yan-Xia Gao; Shi-Gong Guo; Shi-Yuan Yu; Xue-Zhong Yu; Hua-Dong Zhu; Yi Li
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2021

2.  Association of Corticosteroid Treatment With Outcomes in Adult Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fang Fang; Yu Zhang; Jingjing Tang; L Dade Lunsford; Tiangui Li; Rongrui Tang; Jialing He; Ping Xu; Andrew Faramand; Jianguo Xu; Chao You
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 3.  Challenges in the management of septic shock: a narrative review.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Maurizio Cecconi; Jeffrey Lipman; Flavia Machado; Sheila Nainan Myatra; Marlies Ostermann; Anders Perner; Jean-Louis Teboul; Jean-Louis Vincent; Keith R Walley
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Vasopressin in septic shock: what we know and where to next?

Authors:  Paul J Young; Anthony Delaney; Balasubramanian Venkatesh
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Steroid use in critical care.

Authors:  A Young; S Marsh
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2018-03-16

6.  Do trials that report a neutral or negative treatment effect improve the care of critically ill patients? No.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent; John J Marini; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Steroids for sepsis: yes, no or maybe.

Authors:  Paul E Marik
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Hydrocortisone in septic shock: all the questions answered?

Authors:  Josef Briegel; Volker Huge; Patrick Möhnle
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  [Intensive care studies from 2017/2018].

Authors:  C J Reuß; M Bernhard; C Beynon; A Hecker; C Jungk; C Nusshag; M A Weigand; D Michalski; T Brenner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone: Taichi of risk hedge for improving adults with septic shock.

Authors:  Wensen Chen; Yingqin Wang; Ming Zhong
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.