Literature DB >> 36115719

Mouse Mammary Gland Whole Mount Density Assessment across Different Morphologies Using a Bifurcated Program for Image Processing.

Brendan L Rooney1, Brian P Rooney1, Vinona Muralidaran1, Weisheng Wang1, Priscilla A Furth2.   

Abstract

Mammographic density is associated with increased breast cancer risk. Conventional visual assessment of murine mouse models does not include quantified total density analysis. A bifurcated method was sufficient to obtain relative density scores on a broad range of two-dimensional whole mount images that contained both normal and abnormal findings. Image processing techniques, including a ridge operator and a gaussian denoising method, were used to isolate background away from mammary epithelium and use mean pixel intensity to represent mammary density on genetically engineered mouse models for breast cancer in mice 4 to 29 months of age. The bifurcated method allowed for application of an optimal image processing approach for the structural elements present in the whole mount images. Gaussian denoising was the optimal approach when more dense lobular growth and tertiary branching dominate and a ridge operator when epithelial growth was more sparse and secondary branching was the more dominant structural feature. The two processing approaches were combined in a single experimental flow program using an initial image density measurement as the decision point between the two approaches. Higher density was associated with lobular growth, tertiary branching, fibrotic stroma, and presence of cancer. The significance of the study is development of a readily accessible program for digital assessment of mammary gland whole mount density across a range of mammary gland morphologies.
Copyright © 2022 American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36115719      PMCID: PMC9552022          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2022.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9440            Impact factor:   5.770


  27 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative image analysis in mammary gland biology.

Authors:  Rodrigo Fernandez-Gonzalez; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff; Carlos Ortiz-de-Solórzano
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Responsiveness of Brca1 and Trp53 Deficiency-Induced Mammary Preneoplasia to Selective Estrogen Modulators versus an Aromatase Inhibitor in Mus musculus.

Authors:  Sahar J Alothman; Weisheng Wang; David S Goerlitz; Md Islam; Xiaogang Zhong; Archana Kishore; Redha I Azhar; Bhaskar V Kallakury; Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-03-10

3.  Comparison of increased aromatase versus ERα in the generation of mammary hyperplasia and cancer.

Authors:  Edgar S Díaz-Cruz; Yasuro Sugimoto; G Ian Gallicano; Robert W Brueggemeier; Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Application of Sholl analysis to quantify changes in growth and development in rat mammary gland whole mounts.

Authors:  Jason P Stanko; Michael R Easterling; Suzanne E Fenton
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.143

5.  Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske; Robert Rosenberg; Carolyn M Rutter; Berta M Geller; Linn A Abraham; Steven H Taplin; Mark Dignan; Gary Cutter; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Quantitative assessment of mammary gland density in rodents using digital image analysis.

Authors:  John N McGinley; Henry J Thompson
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.244

7.  Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide.

Authors:  Anya Burton; Gertraud Maskarinec; Beatriz Perez-Gomez; Celine Vachon; Hui Miao; Martín Lajous; Ruy López-Ridaura; Megan Rice; Ana Pereira; Maria Luisa Garmendia; Rulla M Tamimi; Kimberly Bertrand; Ava Kwong; Giske Ursin; Eunjung Lee; Samera A Qureshi; Huiyan Ma; Sarah Vinnicombe; Sue Moss; Steve Allen; Rose Ndumia; Sudhir Vinayak; Soo-Hwang Teo; Shivaani Mariapun; Farhana Fadzli; Beata Peplonska; Agnieszka Bukowska; Chisato Nagata; Jennifer Stone; John Hopper; Graham Giles; Vahit Ozmen; Mustafa Erkin Aribal; Joachim Schüz; Carla H Van Gils; Johanna O P Wanders; Reza Sirous; Mehri Sirous; John Hipwell; Jisun Kim; Jong Won Lee; Caroline Dickens; Mikael Hartman; Kee-Seng Chia; Christopher Scott; Anna M Chiarelli; Linda Linton; Marina Pollan; Anath Arzee Flugelman; Dorria Salem; Rasha Kamal; Norman Boyd; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Valerie McCormack
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 8.  Array programming with NumPy.

Authors:  Charles R Harris; K Jarrod Millman; Stéfan J van der Walt; Ralf Gommers; Pauli Virtanen; David Cournapeau; Eric Wieser; Julian Taylor; Sebastian Berg; Nathaniel J Smith; Robert Kern; Matti Picus; Stephan Hoyer; Marten H van Kerkwijk; Matthew Brett; Allan Haldane; Jaime Fernández Del Río; Mark Wiebe; Pearu Peterson; Pierre Gérard-Marchant; Kevin Sheppard; Tyler Reddy; Warren Weckesser; Hameer Abbasi; Christoph Gohlke; Travis E Oliphant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Brief review of image denoising techniques.

Authors:  Linwei Fan; Fan Zhang; Hui Fan; Caiming Zhang
Journal:  Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art       Date:  2019-07-08

Review 10.  SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.

Authors:  Pauli Virtanen; Ralf Gommers; Travis E Oliphant; Matt Haberland; Tyler Reddy; David Cournapeau; Evgeni Burovski; Pearu Peterson; Warren Weckesser; Jonathan Bright; Stéfan J van der Walt; Matthew Brett; Joshua Wilson; K Jarrod Millman; Nikolay Mayorov; Andrew R J Nelson; Eric Jones; Robert Kern; Eric Larson; C J Carey; İlhan Polat; Yu Feng; Eric W Moore; Jake VanderPlas; Denis Laxalde; Josef Perktold; Robert Cimrman; Ian Henriksen; E A Quintero; Charles R Harris; Anne M Archibald; Antônio H Ribeiro; Fabian Pedregosa; Paul van Mulbregt
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.