Literature DB >> 15838604

Quantitative image analysis in mammary gland biology.

Rodrigo Fernandez-Gonzalez1, Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff, Carlos Ortiz-de-Solórzano.   

Abstract

In this paper we present a summary of recent quantitative approaches used for the analysis of macro and microscopic images in mammary gland biology. The advantages and disadvantages of whole mount analysis, reconstruction of serial tissue sections and nucleus/cell segmentation of either conventional and confocal images are discussed, as are applications of quantitative image analysis, such as quantification of protein levels or vasculature measurements in normal tissue and cancer. Integration of quantitative imaging into the further study of the mammary gland holds the promise of better understanding its tissue complexity that evolves during development, differentiation and disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15838604     DOI: 10.1007/s10911-004-1405-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia        ISSN: 1083-3021            Impact factor:   2.673


  60 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of HER-2/neu status in breast cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization and by immunohistochemistry with image analysis.

Authors:  H A Lehr; T W Jacobs; H Yaziji; S J Schnitt; A M Gown
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  DNA labeling index and structure of the rat mammary gland as determinants of its susceptibility to carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J Russo; I H Russo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  A parametric fitting algorithm for segmentation of cell images.

Authors:  H S Wu; J Barba; J Gil
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Efficient, interactive, and three-dimensional segmentation of cell nuclei in thick tissue sections.

Authors:  S J Lockett; D Sudar; C T Thompson; D Pinkel; J W Gray
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1998-04-01

5.  Segmentation of confocal microscope images of cell nuclei in thick tissue sections.

Authors:  C Ortiz de Solórzano; E García Rodriguez; A Jones; D Pinkel; J W Gray; D Sudar; S J Lockett
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.758

6.  Three-dimensional reconstruction by confocal laser scanning microscopy in routine pathologic specimens of benign and malignant lesions of the human breast.

Authors:  S Liu; D L Weaver; D J Taatjes
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.304

7.  Developmental stage of the rat mammary gland as determinant of its susceptibility to 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene.

Authors:  I H Russo; J Russo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Objective nuclear grading for node-negative breast cancer patients: comparison of quasi-3D and 2D image-analysis based on light microscopic images.

Authors:  R Albert; J G Müller; P Kristen; H Harms
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.662

9.  Prenatal TCDD and predisposition to mammary cancer in the rat.

Authors:  N M Brown; P A Manzolillo; J X Zhang; J Wang; C A Lamartiniere
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.944

10.  Leptin receptor-deficient MMTV-TGF-alpha/Lepr(db)Lepr(db) female mice do not develop oncogene-induced mammary tumors.

Authors:  Margot P Cleary; Subhash C Juneja; Frederick C Phillips; Xin Hu; Joseph P Grande; Nita J Maihle
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2004-02
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative three-dimensional microscopy approaches with applications in breast cancer biology including measurement of genomic instability.

Authors:  Stephen Lockett; Carlos Ortiz de Solorzano; Daniel Baggett; Koei Chin
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  In-silico QTL mapping of postpubertal mammary ductal development in the mouse uncovers potential human breast cancer risk loci.

Authors:  Darryl L Hadsell; Louise A Hadsell; Walter Olea; Monique Rijnkels; Chad J Creighton; Ian Smyth; Kieran M Short; Liza L Cox; Timothy C Cox
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Mouse Mammary Gland Whole Mount Density Assessment across Different Morphologies Using a Bifurcated Program for Image Processing.

Authors:  Brendan L Rooney; Brian P Rooney; Vinona Muralidaran; Weisheng Wang; Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.770

4.  Avoiding Pitfalls in the Statistical Analysis of Heterogeneous Tumors.

Authors:  David E Axelrod; Naomi Miller; Judith-Anne W Chapman
Journal:  Biomed Inform Insights       Date:  2009-01-01

5.  Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional human mammary epithelial tissue architecture reveals a role for tenascin-C in regulating c-met function.

Authors:  Agne Taraseviciute; Benjamin T Vincent; Pepper Schedin; Peter Lloyd Jones
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.307

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.