Jie Yan1, Ming Liu1, Danning Yang1, Yu Zhang1, Fengshuang An2. 1. Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education, Chinese National Health Commission and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, State and Shandong Province Joint Key Laboratory of Translational Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China. 2. Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education, Chinese National Health Commission and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, State and Shandong Province Joint Key Laboratory of Translational Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250012, Shandong, China. fengshuang.an@hotmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that omega-3 fatty acids are beneficial in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, but many large randomized controlled trial studies and meta-analyses have come to different conclusions. The evidence for omega-3 fatty acids supplementation to prevent cardiovascular disease remains insufficient. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of several types of omega-3 fatty acids supplements. METHODS: We comprehensively searched the online database and found 15 RCTs. The primary efficacy outcomes included major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death. The safety endpoints included gastrointestinal problems, bleeding-related disorders, and cancer. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the main characteristics of the population, and the dose-response relationship of omega-3 fatty acids was evaluated by meta-regression. All results were calculated by the random effect model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using chi-square tests and quantified using I-square statistics. RESULTS: The incidence of major cardiovascular events (RR 0.95, 95%CI 0.91 to 0.99, P = 0.026), myocardial infarction (RR 0.90, 95%CI 0.83 to 0.98; P = 0.021), and cardiovascular death (RR 0.94, 95%CI 0.88 to 0.99; P = 0.028) was reduced in the omega-3 fatty acid group compared with the control group. An increased risk of atrial fibrillation (RR 1.25, 95%CI 1.10 to 1.41; P = 0.000) was observed in patients in the omega-3 fatty acid group. No statistical differences were observed between the two groups in heart failure, stroke, and all-cause death. For safety endpoints, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in gastrointestinal problems, bleeding-related disorders, and cancer. Subgroup analysis showed that the cardiovascular benefit of omega-3 fatty acids was primarily attributable to the prescription of EPA ethyl ester. Omega-3 fatty acids may reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors, and reduce the risk of myocardial infarction in patients without cardiovascular disease; however, they may increase the risk of stroke in patients with myocardial infarction. In addition, prescription omega-3 acid ethyl ester has a good safety profile, and prescription EPA ethyl ester has a high risk of bleeding. CONCLUSION: Moderate evidence showed that the use of omega-3 fatty acids may reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. Compared to other types of omega-3 fatty acids supplements, we support the use of prescription EPA ethyl ester formulations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, but the potential risk of atrial fibrillation and bleeding cannot be ignored. It is important to note that omega-3 fatty acids should be applied with caution in patients with previous myocardial infarction, which may increase the risk of stroke. Finally, omega-3 fatty acids are relatively safe and in general do not increase gastrointestinal problems, bleeding-related disorders, or cancer, but attention needs to be paid to the risk of bleeding with prescription EPA ethyl ester formulations.
BACKGROUND: It is widely accepted that omega-3 fatty acids are beneficial in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, but many large randomized controlled trial studies and meta-analyses have come to different conclusions. The evidence for omega-3 fatty acids supplementation to prevent cardiovascular disease remains insufficient. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of several types of omega-3 fatty acids supplements. METHODS: We comprehensively searched the online database and found 15 RCTs. The primary efficacy outcomes included major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death. The safety endpoints included gastrointestinal problems, bleeding-related disorders, and cancer. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the main characteristics of the population, and the dose-response relationship of omega-3 fatty acids was evaluated by meta-regression. All results were calculated by the random effect model. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using chi-square tests and quantified using I-square statistics. RESULTS: The incidence of major cardiovascular events (RR 0.95, 95%CI 0.91 to 0.99, P = 0.026), myocardial infarction (RR 0.90, 95%CI 0.83 to 0.98; P = 0.021), and cardiovascular death (RR 0.94, 95%CI 0.88 to 0.99; P = 0.028) was reduced in the omega-3 fatty acid group compared with the control group. An increased risk of atrial fibrillation (RR 1.25, 95%CI 1.10 to 1.41; P = 0.000) was observed in patients in the omega-3 fatty acid group. No statistical differences were observed between the two groups in heart failure, stroke, and all-cause death. For safety endpoints, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in gastrointestinal problems, bleeding-related disorders, and cancer. Subgroup analysis showed that the cardiovascular benefit of omega-3 fatty acids was primarily attributable to the prescription of EPA ethyl ester. Omega-3 fatty acids may reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors, and reduce the risk of myocardial infarction in patients without cardiovascular disease; however, they may increase the risk of stroke in patients with myocardial infarction. In addition, prescription omega-3 acid ethyl ester has a good safety profile, and prescription EPA ethyl ester has a high risk of bleeding. CONCLUSION: Moderate evidence showed that the use of omega-3 fatty acids may reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. Compared to other types of omega-3 fatty acids supplements, we support the use of prescription EPA ethyl ester formulations for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, but the potential risk of atrial fibrillation and bleeding cannot be ignored. It is important to note that omega-3 fatty acids should be applied with caution in patients with previous myocardial infarction, which may increase the risk of stroke. Finally, omega-3 fatty acids are relatively safe and in general do not increase gastrointestinal problems, bleeding-related disorders, or cancer, but attention needs to be paid to the risk of bleeding with prescription EPA ethyl ester formulations.
Authors: JoAnn E Manson; Nancy R Cook; I-Min Lee; William Christen; Shari S Bassuk; Samia Mora; Heike Gibson; Christine M Albert; David Gordon; Trisha Copeland; Denise D'Agostino; Georgina Friedenberg; Claire Ridge; Vadim Bubes; Edward L Giovannucci; Walter C Willett; Julie E Buring Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Deepak L Bhatt; P Gabriel Steg; Michael Miller; Eliot A Brinton; Terry A Jacobson; Steven B Ketchum; Ralph T Doyle; Rebecca A Juliano; Lixia Jiao; Craig Granowitz; Jean-Claude Tardif; Christie M Ballantyne Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Louise Bowman; Marion Mafham; Karl Wallendszus; Will Stevens; Georgina Buck; Jill Barton; Kevin Murphy; Theingi Aung; Richard Haynes; Jolyon Cox; Aleksandra Murawska; Allen Young; Michael Lay; Fang Chen; Emily Sammons; Emma Waters; Amanda Adler; Jonathan Bodansky; Andrew Farmer; Roger McPherson; Andrew Neil; David Simpson; Richard Peto; Colin Baigent; Rory Collins; Sarah Parish; Jane Armitage Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-08-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Theingi Aung; Jim Halsey; Daan Kromhout; Hertzel C Gerstein; Roberto Marchioli; Luigi Tavazzi; Johanna M Geleijnse; Bernhard Rauch; Andrew Ness; Pilar Galan; Emily Y Chew; Jackie Bosch; Rory Collins; Sarah Lewington; Jane Armitage; Robert Clarke Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 14.676