| Literature DB >> 36088315 |
Yihan Li1, Qingxian Tian2, Kunpeng Leng1, Meng Guo1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transverse patellar fractures can be fixed using various techniques. The purpose of the current study was to assess the clinical outcomes and complication rate of a combined fixation technique using cannulated screws and the modified Pyrford technique with nonabsorbable polyester sutures. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Between January 2015 and February 2021, 26 transverse patellar fractures were fixed with this combined technique. Preoperative data were collected from patients with transverse patellar fractures who were followed up for at least 12 months. At each follow-up visit, plain radiographs were taken. At the 12-month postoperative follow-up, range of motion of the affected knee joint and clinical outcomes, as evaluated by the Bostman scoring system, were recorded.Entities:
Keywords: Cannulated screws; Clinical outcomes; Complications; Device removal; Nonabsorbable polyester sutures; Transverse patellar fractures
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36088315 PMCID: PMC9463777 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01788-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Surg ISSN: 1471-2482 Impact factor: 2.030
Fig. 1Combined fixation with cannulated screws and the modified Pyrford technique. a Modified Pyrford technique; b cannulated screw fixation; c combined fixation
Fig. 2The image of a transverse patellar fracture fixed with combined fixation during the surgery
The demographic data, interval between injury and surgery of the patients
| Number | Gender | Age range (years) | Injury mechanism | BMI (kg2/m) | Diabetes mellitus | Cigarette use | Interval between injury and surgery (day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Male | 16–20 | Sports | 22.4 | No | No | 3 |
| 2 | Female | 61–65 | Fall | 25.1 | No | No | 5 |
| 3 | Female | 31–35 | Fall | 18.7 | No | No | 7 |
| 4 | Male | 21–25 | Traffic accident | 23 | No | No | 1 |
| 5 | Female | 66–70 | Fall | 26.8 | No | No | 2 |
| 6 | Female | 71–75 | Fall | 23.6 | No | No | 5 |
| 7 | Female | 46–50 | Fall | 21.4 | No | Yes | 4 |
| 8 | Male | 71–75 | Fall | 25.5 | No | Yes | 4 |
| 9 | Female | 56–60 | Traffic accident | 18.2 | No | No | 4 |
| 10 | Female | 71–75 | Fall | 27.9 | Yes | No | 3 |
| 11 | Male | 46–50 | Fall | 29.5 | No | No | 6 |
| 12 | Female | 76–80 | Fall | 24.4 | No | No | 3 |
| 13 | Male | 41–45 | Fall | 24.7 | No | No | 2 |
| 14 | Male | 26–30 | Sports | 23.2 | No | No | 3 |
| 15 | Female | 81–85 | Fall | 27.9 | No | No | 5 |
| 16 | Male | 36–40 | Fall | 27.8 | No | No | 7 |
| 17 | Female | 26–30 | Fall | 17.4 | No | No | 5 |
| 18 | Male | 16–20 | Traffic accident | 22.6 | No | Yes | 5 |
| 19 | Male | 51–55 | Fall | 28.8 | Yes | Yes | 3 |
| 20 | Female | 76–80 | Fall | 22.9 | No | No | 7 |
| 21 | Male | 71–75 | Fall | 26.3 | Yes | No | 2 |
| 22 | Female | 76–80 | Fall | 25.3 | Yes | No | 4 |
| 23 | Female | 66–70 | Fall | 24.6 | No | No | 4 |
| 24 | Male | 61–65 | Fall | 26.1 | No | No | 5 |
| 25 | Female | 66–70 | Fall | 26.3 | Yes | No | 2 |
| 26 | Female | 66–70 | Fall | 26.8 | No | No | 5 |
BMI body mass index
Fig. 3Plain radiographs of the patient (number 12). a before surgery; b before surgery; c at 1 day postsurgery; d at 1 year postsurgery
Fig. 4Plain radiographs of the patient (number 23). a before surgery; b before surgery; c immediately after surgery; d at 1 year postsurgery
Fig. 5The patient showed the range of motion of the affected knee joint at the final follow-up. a Extension; b flexion
The data of follow-up periods, functional outcomes, complications and the requirement for secondary surgeries
| Number | Bone healing time (month) | Follow-up periods (month) | Bostman score (points, grading) | Range of motion (extension–flexion, degree) | Complications | Requirement for secondary surgeries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 12 | 30, Excellent | 5–135 | No | No |
| 2 | 3 | 16 | 30, Excellent | 5–125 | No | No |
| 3 | 3 | 14 | 29, Excellent | 5–135 | No | No |
| 4 | 3 | 18 | 29, Excellent | 5–135 | No | No |
| 5 | 3 | 15 | 28, Excellent | 5–125 | No | No |
| 6 | 3 | 27 | 26, Good | 0–120 | Pain after long distance walking or stair-climbing | No |
| 7 | 3 | 18 | 28, Excellent | 5–125 | No | No |
| 8 | 3 | 16 | 28, Excellent | 0–125 | No | No |
| 9 | 3 | 12 | 28, Excellent | 0–130 | No | No |
| 10 | 3 | 19 | 29, Excellent | 5–125 | No | No |
| 11 | 3 | 13 | 29, Excellent | 5–125 | No | No |
| 12 | 3 | 18 | 28, Excellent | 0–125 | No | No |
| 13 | 3 | 16 | 30, Excellent | 5–130 | No | No |
| 14 | 2 | 12 | 30, Excellent | 5–135 | No | No |
| 15 | 3 | 26 | 25, Good | 0–110 | Pain after long distance walking or stair-climbing | No |
| 16 | 3 | 12 | 30, Excellent | 5–130 | No | No |
| 17 | 4 | 16 | 29, Excellent | 0–125 | Delayed bone healing | No |
| 18 | 3 | 24 | 28, Excellent | 0–130 | No | removal |
| 19 | 3 | 17 | 28, Excellent | 0–130 | Superficial infection | No |
| 20 | 3 | 12 | 28, Excellent | 0–125 | No | No |
| 21 | 3 | 14 | 28, Excellent | 0–125 | No | No |
| 22 | 3 | 19 | 26, Good | 0–110 | No | No |
| 23 | 3 | 15 | 28, Excellent | 0–125 | No | No |
| 24 | 3 | 12 | 29, Excellent | 5–125 | No | No |
| 25 | 3 | 23 | 27, Good | 0–105 | Pain after long distance walking or stair-climbing | No |
| 26 | 3 | 12 | 30, Excellent | 5–125 | No | No |
Bostman score: excellent, 30 to 28 points; good, 27 to 20 points; unsatisfactory, < 20 points