Literature DB >> 30720558

Biomechanical Comparison of Tension Band Fixation of Patella Transverse Fracture: Headless Screws Versus Headed Screws.

Jill M Martin1, Dylan T Applin1, Linda M McGrady1,2, Mei Wang1,2, Gregory J Schmeling1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the stability and strength of tension band wire fixation using headless compression screws versus headed screws for transverse patella fractures.
METHODS: Six matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric knees with transverse osteotomies created at the midpoint of the patella were surgically fixed, with one knee randomly receiving fixation with headless screws (Acumed Acutrak 4/5) and the other with headed screws (Synthes 4.0 partially threaded cannulated screws). The specimens were mounted onto a servohydraulic load frame in a 45-degree flexed position and loaded through the quadriceps tendon. Interfragmentary movement was recorded with a motion analysis system. The initial fixation stiffness, range of interfragmentary motion, and strength of the headless screw construct were compared with the headed screw construct. Failure was defined as either a sudden drop in applied tendon force or 2 mm of separation on the anterior surface of the patella (ie, clinical failure), whichever occurred first.
RESULTS: Mean primary interfragmentary motion was 0.31 ± 0.28 degrees for the headed screws and 0.10 ± 0.06 degrees for headless screws under 150 N load (P = 0.03). Mean construct stiffness was 277 ± 243 N/degrees for the headed screws and 510 ± 362 N/degrees for the headless screws (P = 0.03). None of the constructs from either group displayed structural failure before reaching the clinical failure gap of 2 mm. The mean clinical failure strength was 808 ± 183 N for the headless screws construct and 520 ± 241 N for the headed screws construct (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Headless screw tension band fixation demonstrated superior biomechanical behaviors over standard headed screw fixation with higher construct rigidity, smaller interfragmentary motion, and greater fixation strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30720558     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  2 in total

Review 1.  [Progress in the surgical treatment of the patellar fracture].

Authors:  Guanglei Li; Ping Liu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-08-15

2.  The clinical outcomes and complications of combined fixation with cannulated screws and the modified Pyrford technique for the treatment of transverse patellar fractures: a case series study.

Authors:  Yihan Li; Qingxian Tian; Kunpeng Leng; Meng Guo
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 2.030

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.