| Literature DB >> 32904039 |
Ho-Jae Lee1, Byung-Kook Kim1, Han-Seung Ryu1, Jinmyoung Dan1.
Abstract
In the treatment of displaced patella fractures, open reduction and internal fixation is essential for patellofemoral congruency and restoration of the knee extension mechanism. Various surgical techniques and materials can be used, and their clinical outcomes are favorable. However, soft-tissue and skin irritation, pain, and limited range of motion due to metallic hardware can occur, and removal of hardware such as screws and K-wire may be required after bony union. We present a vertical interfragmentary suture technique for patella fractures using sequential compressive tightening with the Nice knot. This knot-tying technique is low profile, provides stable fixation enough to hold displaced fractures, and does not require a secondary procedure for hardware removal.Entities:
Keywords: Nice knot tie; Patellar fracture; Vertical inter-fragmentary suture
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32904039 PMCID: PMC7449849 DOI: 10.4055/cios20018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Orthop Surg ISSN: 2005-291X
Fig. 1(A) Three-dimensional computed tomography showing a displaced transverse patella fracture with comminuted fragments at the lateral margin and inferior pole. (B) After exposure of the fracture site and bone drilling, a polydioxanone (PDS) was passed through the 16-g spinal needle to facilitate the shuttle relay of the suture material in bone tunnels. (C) A schematic drawing of a sagittal cut image of the shuttle relay of the suture. A PDS was passed through the 16-g spinal needle. (D) The knots were slid down by pulling the 2 free limbs. The fracture site was sequentially secured by repeated sliding and tightening of the knots. (E) A final sagittal schematic drawing of the Nice knot tying on the patella fracture. The bone fragments were compressed against fracture by knots.
Fig. 2(A) The braided suture was doubled over to obtain 2 free limbs on one end and a loop on the other. (B) The simple square knot was thrown using the loop on one hand and the 2 free limbs on the other. (C) The loop was opened and both free limbs were passed through it. (D) The knot was then dressed by making the loop smaller. (E) The knot was slid down by pulling the 2 free limbs apart. (F) To secure the knot, 3 alternating half hitches or surgeon's knots were performed using the 2 separated free limbs.
Fig. 3The bony fragment was compressed against the fracture site with tied knots. After operation, plain radiography showed congruency of the joint line without the use of metallic hardware.
Patient Demographics
| Case | Age (yr)/ sex | Type of injury | Fracture location | No. of Nice knot ties | Follow-up (mo) | Union time (wk) | ROM at final FU | F-VAS | Removal of ties | Complication |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62/F | Slip down | Inferior pole | 3 | 12 | 11 | 0–130 | 0 | No | - |
| 2 | 45/M | TA | Transverse body | 3 | 16 | 14 | 5–130 | 1 | No | Superficial infection |
| 3 | 58/M | TA | Transverse body | 4 | 13 | 13 | 0–140 | 0 | No | - |
| 4 | 67/F | Slip down | Transverse body | 3 | 12 | 15 | 10–130 | 2 | No | Preexisting PF arthritis |
| 5 | 72/F | Slip down | Transverse body | 3 | 14 | 12 | 10–110 | 2 | No | Delayed union |
| 6 | 65/F | Fall down | Inferior pole | 3 | 15 | 12 | 0–130 | 0 | No | - |
ROM: range of motion, FU: follow-up, F-VAS: final visual analog scale, TA: traffic accident, PF: patella-femoral.