| Literature DB >> 36080573 |
Angela Alysia Elaine1, Steven Imanuel Krisyanto1, Aliya Nur Hasanah1,2.
Abstract
A molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) is a synthetic polymer that has characteristics such as natural receptors which are able to interact and bind to a specific molecule that is used as a template in the MIP polymerization process. MIPs have been widely developed because of the need for more selective, effective, and efficient methods for sample preparation, identification, isolation, and separation. The MIP compositions consist of a template, monomer, crosslinker, initiator, and porogenic solvent. Generally, MIPs are only synthesized using one type of monomer (mono-functional monomer); however, along with the development of MIPs, MIPs began to be synthesized using two types of monomers to improve the performance of MIPs. MIPs used for identification, separation, and molecular analysis have the most applications in solid-phase extraction (SPE) and as biochemical sensors. Until now, no review article has discussed the various studies carried out in recent years in relation to the synthesis of dual-functional monomer MIPs. This review is necessary, as an improvement in the performance of MIPs still needs to be explored, and a dual-functional monomer strategy is one way of overcoming the current performance limitations. In this review article, we discuss the techniques commonly used in the synthesis of dual-functional monomer MIPs, and the use of dual-functional monomer MIPs as sorbents in the MI-SPE method and as detection elements in biochemical sensors. The application of dual-functional monomer MIPs showed better selectivity and adsorption capacity in these areas when compared to mono-functional monomer MIPs. However, the combination of functional monomers must be selected properly, in order to achieve an effective synergistic effect and produce the ideal MIP characteristics. Therefore, studies regarding the synergistic effect of the MIP combination still need to be carried out to obtain MIPs with superior characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: MI-SPE; MIP; biochemical sensor; dual-functional monomer MIP; mono-functional monomer MIP; sorbent
Year: 2022 PMID: 36080573 PMCID: PMC9460123 DOI: 10.3390/polym14173498
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Illustration of the precipitation polymerization method (left) and bulk polymerization method (right).
Figure 2Illustration of the polymerization process of dual-functional monomer MIPs.
Dual-Functional Monomer MIP Applications as an MI-SPE Adsorbent.
| No | Monomer | Template Molecule | Qmax (mg/g) | IF | % Recovery | Ref | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM | DM | SM | DM | |||||
|
| MAA and 2VP | Boc-L-Tryptophan | 0.115 (2VP) | 0.058 | 2.35 (2VP) | 4.35 | - | [ |
| 0.035 (MAA) | 1.9 (MAA) | |||||||
|
| MAA and 2VP | Ciprofloxacin | 1.12 (2VP) | 2.4 | 1.51 (2VP) | 1.66 | 105% | [ |
| 1.6 (MAA) | 0.8 (MAA) | |||||||
|
| MAA and 2VP | Ciprofloxacin | 4.66 (MAA) | 10.28 | 0.92 (MAA) | 2.55 | 65.97–119.26% | [ |
|
| MAA and 4VP | Sarafloxacin | 51.64 (4VP) | 52.80 | 4.94 (4VP) | 5.52 | 94.0–101.3% | [ |
| 48.56 (MAA) | 5.4 (MAA) | |||||||
|
| 4VP and GMA | Myricetin | 3.42 (4VP) | 11.8 | - | 4.9 | 79.82–84.32% | [ |
|
| β-CD and MAA | Glycyrrhizic Acid | 75.4 (β-CD) | 69.3 | 1.24 (β-CD) | 3.77 | 71.5–77.5% | [ |
| 69.1 (MAA) | 1.41 (MAA) | |||||||
|
| APBA and AMPA | Polysaccharide (starch) | 8.89 (APBA) | 13.08 | 1.63 (APBA) | 2.22 | - | [ |
| 4.62 (AMPA) | 1.39 (AMPA) | |||||||
|
| MAA and 4VP | Methyl parathion | 1.25 (4VP) | 2 | 4.4 (4VP) | 5 | 81.1–87.0% | [ |
| 3.5 (MAA) | 1.4 (MAA) | |||||||
Figure 3(a) Illustration of surface imprinting/electro−polymerization. (b) Illustration of emulsion polymerization.
Dual-Functional Monomer MIP Applications as Sensors.
| No. | Monomer | Template | LOD (M) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Styrene and 4-vinylbenzoic acid | L-Tryptophan | 6 × 10−6 | [ |
| 2 | MAA and IA | Tetracycline | 1.38 × 10−14 | [ |
| 3 | MAA and FluMa | Nafcillin | 5 × 10−3 | [ |