| Literature DB >> 36079921 |
Suhang Song1,2, Alexandra M Gaynor1, Emily Cruz1, Seonjoo Lee3,4, Yunglin Gazes1,5,6, Christian Habeck1,5,6, Yaakov Stern1,5,6,7, Yian Gu1,5,6,8.
Abstract
Current evidence on the impact of Mediterranean diet (MeDi) on white matter hyperintensity (WMH) trajectory is scarce. This study aims to examine whether greater adherence to MeDi is associated with less accumulation of WMH. This population-based longitudinal study included 183 cognitively intact adults aged 20-80 years. The MeDi score was obtained from a self-reported food frequency questionnaire; WMH was assessed by 3T MRI. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate the effect of MeDi on WMH change. Covariates included socio-demographic factors and brain markers. Moderation effects by age, gender, and race/ethnicity were examined, followed by stratification analyses. Among all participants, WMH increased from baseline to follow-up (mean difference [follow-up-baseline] [standard deviation] = 0.31 [0.48], p < 0.001). MeDi adherence was negatively associated with the increase in WMH (β = -0.014, 95% CI = -0.026--0.001, p = 0.034), adjusting for all covariates. The association between MeDi and WMH change was moderated by age (young group = reference, p-interaction[middle-aged × MeDi] = 0.075, p-interaction[older × MeDi] = 0.037). The association between MeDi and WMH change was observed among the young group (β = -0.035, 95% CI = -0.058--0.013, p = 0.003), but not among other age groups. Moderation effects by gender and race/ethnicity did not reach significance. Greater adherence to MeDi was associated with a lesser increase in WMH over time. Following a healthy diet, especially at younger age, may help to maintain a healthy brain.Entities:
Keywords: Mediterranean diet; moderation; white matter hyperintensity change
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36079921 PMCID: PMC9460774 DOI: 10.3390/nu14173664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Flow chart of participant selection.
Summary of characteristics (n = 183).
| All (n = 183) | Low MeDi | Middle MeDi | High MeDi | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MeDi score | Mean (SD) | 28.20 (5.54) | 22.54 (3.46) | 28.54 (1.09) | 33.68 (3.03) | <0.001 *** |
| Range | 12–43 | 12–26 | 27–30 | 31–43 | ||
| Follow up interval, years | Mean (SD) | 4.86 (0.61) | 4.97 (0.65) | 4.90 (0.58) | 4.73 (0.57) | 0.060 |
| Age, years | Mean (SD) | 53.19 (16.52) | 51.25 (16.75) | 55.52 (15.71) | 53.38 (16.9) | 0.385 |
| Age groups | ||||||
| <43 years | n (%) | 51 (27.87) | 22 (32.84) | 12 (24.00) | 17 (25.76) | 0.707 |
| 43–64 years | n (%) | 72 (39.34) | 27 (40.30) | 20 (40.00) | 25 (37.88) | |
| ≥65 years | n (%) | 60 (32.79) | 18 (26.87) | 18 (36.00) | 24 (36.36) | |
| Education, years | Mean (SD) | 16.33 (2.37) | 16.34 (2.17) | 16.38 (2.41) | 16.27 (2.55) | 0.969 |
| NARTIQ | Mean (SD) | 117.82 (8.20) | 118.39 (7.80) | 117.96 (8.91) | 117.14 (8.12) | 0.676 |
| Calorie, kcal | Mean (SD) | 1352.07 (557.11) | 1237.48 (484.98) | 1304.29 (518.13) | 1504.58 (623.63) | 0.016 * |
| Baseline WMH, log | Mean (SD) | 1.77 (1.29) | 1.68 (1.31) | 1.77 (1.31) | 1.85 (1.26) | 0.764 |
| Follow-up WMH, log | Mean (SD) | 2.07 (1.37) | 2.06 (1.30) | 2.03 (1.40) | 2.12 (1.43) | 0.924 |
| Change of WMH | Mean (SD) | 0.31 (0.48) *** a | 0.37 (0.53) *** a | 0.25 (0.47) *** a | 0.28 (0.42) *** a | 0.337 |
| Total grey matter volume, baseline, cm3 | Mean (SD) | 623.72 (58.65) | 630.31 (56.56) | 609.45 (64.68) | 627.84 (54.87) | 0.127 |
| Mean thickness, baseline, mm | Mean (SD) | 2.47 (0.15) | 2.46 (0.15) | 2.45 (0.15) | 2.49 (0.15) | 0.374 |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | n (%) | 89 (48.63%) | 44 (65.67%) | 17 (34.00%) | 28 (42.42%) | 0.001 ** |
| Female | n (%) | 94 (51.37%) | 23 (34.33%) | 33 (66.00%) | 38 (57.58%) | |
| Race/ethnicity | ||||||
| Non-Hispanic white and others | n (%) | 120 (65.57%) | 44 (65.67%) | 34 (68.00%) | 42 (63.64%) | 0.650 |
| Non-Hispanic black | n (%) | 40 (21.86%) | 12 (17.91%) | 12 (24.00%) | 16 (24.24%) | |
| Hispanic | n (%) | 23 (12.57%) | 11 (16.42%) | 4 (8.00%) | 8 (12.12%) |
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. Abbreviation: MeDi = Mediterranean diet; NARTIQ = National Adult Reading Test-assessed Intelligence Quotient; WMH = White matter hyperintensity. a A one sample t-test was used to determine if the change in WMH burden from baseline to follow-up equals zero over an average of five years.
Figure 2Relationship between Mediterranean diet score and white matter hyperintensity at baseline and follow-up visits.
Association between Mediterranean diet and change in white matter hyperintensity by population groups.
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| β (95% CI) |
| ||||
| MeDi score | −0.015 ** | 0.020 | -- | −0.014 ** | 0.028 | -- | −0.014 ** | 0.034 | -- |
| By age group | |||||||||
| Aged < 43 yrs | −0.038 *** | 0.0002 | Ref. | −0.035*** | 0.002 | Ref. | −0.035 *** | 0.003 | Ref. |
| Aged 43–64 yrs (n = 72) | −0.002 | 0.872 | 0.024 ** | −0.005 | 0.730 | 0.067 * | −0.004 | 0.771 | 0.075 * |
| Aged ≥ 65 yrs | −0.002 | 0.836 | 0.017 ** | 0.0001 | 0.991 | 0.037 ** | 0.0003 | 0.971 | 0.037 ** |
| By gender | |||||||||
| Male (n = 89) | −0.007 | 0.429 | Ref. | −0.008 | 0.401 | Ref. | −0.006 | 0.526 | Ref. |
| Female (n = 94) | −0.022 ** | 0.025 | 0.332 | −0.016 | 0.088 | 0.618 | −0.017 | 0.071 | 0.624 |
| By race/ethnicity | |||||||||
| Non-Hispanic White and other (n = 120) | −0.011 | 0.154 | Ref. | −0.015 ** | 0.045 | Ref. | −0.015 | 0.052 | Ref. |
| Non-Hispanic Black (n = 40) | −0.009 | 0.517 | 0.957 | −0.006 | 0.731 | 0.628 | −0.008 | 0.646 | 0.622 |
| Hispanic (n = 23) | −0.020 | 0.297 | 0.293 | −0.007 | 0.751 | 0.471 | −0.007 | 0.793 | 0.445 |
| By MeDi group | |||||||||
| Low MeDi | −0.056 *** | 0.003 | Ref. | −0.052 *** | 0.007 | Ref. | −0.053 *** | 0.008 | Ref. |
| Middle MeDi | −0.029 | 0.647 | 0.769 | −0.048 | 0.481 | 0.938 | −0.053 | 0.451 | 0.913 |
| High MeDi | 0.001 | 0.957 | 0.034 ** | 0.005 | 0.737 | 0.050 ** | 0.007 | 0.685 | 0.052 * |
* p < 0.1; ** p < 0.05; *** p < 0.01. a p-inter indicates the p value of the interaction term of continuous MeDi score and age/gender/race(ethnicity)/MeDi group. Model 1 was adjusted by age and follow-up interval. Model 2 was additionally adjusted by gender, education, NARTIQ, race/ethnicity, total daily energy intake, and baseline WMH. Model 3 was additionally adjusted by baseline gray matter volume residual and baseline mean thickness. In each age group, age was not included in the adjustment; in each gender group, gender was not included in the adjustment; in each race/ethnicity group, race/ethnicity was not included in the adjustment.
Figure 3Relationship between Mediterranean diet score and change in white matter hyperintensity by age, gender, race/ethnicity, and tertile MeDi group.
Association between individual food category and the change in white matter hyperintensity (log).
| Total Participants b | Interaction of Age × Food c | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β | 95% CI |
| β | 95% CI | ||
| Cereal | −0.034 | (−0.077–0.009) | 0.122 | −0.001 | (−0.003–0.001) | 0.368 |
| Potato | 0.024 | (−0.029–0.076) | 0.376 | −0.001 | (−0.004–0.002) | 0.449 |
| Fruit | 0.022 | (−0.031–0.075) | 0.409 | 0.001 | (−0.001–0.004) | 0.338 |
| Vegetable | −0.095 | (−0.162–−0.028) | 0.006 | 0.003 | (−0.0002–0.007) | 0.068 |
| Legumes and nuts | −0.020 | (−0.066–0.025) | 0.378 | 0.001 | (−0.001–0.004) | 0.337 |
| Fish | 0.071 | (−0.002–0.143) | 0.056 | 0.001 | (−0.004–0.005) | 0.797 |
| Olive Oil | 0.009 | (−0.037–0.055) | 0.700 | 0.001 | (−0.002–0.004) | 0.677 |
| Poultry a | −0.036 | (−0.083–0.012) | 0.138 | −0.0005 | (−0.003–0.002) | 0.705 |
| Red meat a | 0.006 | (−0.038–0.050) | 0.790 | 0.001 | (−0.001–0.004) | 0.304 |
| Dairy a | −0.045 | (−0.086–−0.004) | 0.031 | 0.002 | (−0.0001–0.004) | 0.065 |
| Alcohol a | 0.010 | (−0.029–0.050) | 0.609 | 0.003 | (0.00005–0.005) | 0.046 |
a higher score indicated less intake. b All food categories were entered into models simultaneously, and the model was adjusted by age and follow-up interval. Each food category was estimated by scores of 0−5. c Age was modeled as a continuous variable. Each food category was in a separate model, and the models were adjusted by follow-up interval.