| Literature DB >> 36078821 |
Elena Ioana Iconaru1, Constantin Ciucurel1.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the correlation between body composition (measured as weight, body mass index, and body fat percentage (BFP)) and electrocardiographic ventricular parameters (the QT and TQ intervals and the ratios between the electrical diastole and electrical systole (TQ/QT) and between the cardiac cycle and electrical diastole (RR/TQ), both for uncorrected and corrected intervals) in a sample of 50 healthy subjects (age interval 19-23 years, mean age 21.27 ± 1.41 years, 33 women and 17 men). Subjects' measurements were performed with a bioimpedancemetry body composition analyzer and a portable ECG monitor with six leads. Starting from the correlations obtained between the investigated continuous variables, we performed a standard linear regression analysis between the body composition parameters and the ECG ones. Our results revealed that some of our regression models are statistically significant (p < 0.001). Thus, a specific part of the variability of the dependent variables (ECG ventricular activity parameters for corrected QT intervals) is explained by the independent variable BFP. Therefore, body composition influences ventricular electrical activity in young adults, which implies a differentiated interpretation of the electrocardiogram in these situations.Entities:
Keywords: bioimpedance analysis; electrocardiography; systolic and diastolic intervals; young people
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36078821 PMCID: PMC9518147 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191711105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Statistical indicators for body composition parameters in the experimental group (n = 50).
| Variable | Age (Years) | H (cm) | W (kg) | BMI (kg/m2) | BFP (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 21.27 | 168.50 | 69.53 | 24.38 | 28.03 |
| SD | 1.41 | 8.70 | 16.34 | 5.11 | 8.83 |
| CV (%) | 6.63 | 5.17 | 23.51 | 20.97 | 31.51 |
| Min | 19 | 152.3 | 45.7 | 16.07 | 9.4 |
| Max | 23 | 194.7 | 110.3 | 39.45 | 49.8 |
Note: W, weight; H, height; BMI, body mass index; BFP, body fat percentage; SD, standard deviation; Min, minimum value; Max, maximum value; CV, coefficient of variation; n, group size.
Statistical indicators for ventricular electrical parameters in the experimental group (n = 50).
| Variable | HR (Beats/min) | QT (ms) | TQ (ms) | QTc (ms) | TQc (ms) | RR (ms) | TQ/QT | RR/TQ | TQc/QTc | RRc/TQc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 77.76 | 345.32 | 449.98 | 389.69 | 610.31 | 795.30 | 1.30 | 1.82 | 1.58 | 1.64 |
| SD | 14.03 | 29.80 | 119.41 | 28.93 | 28.93 | 136.77 | 0.30 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.08 |
| CV (%) | 18.04 | 8.63 | 26.54 | 7.42 | 4.74 | 17.20 | 23.29 | 12.68 | 11.57 | 5.02 |
| Min | 58 | 280 | 208 | 346 | 504 | 508 | 0.61 | 1.55 | 1.02 | 1.53 |
| Max | 118 | 400 | 657 | 496 | 654 | 1034 | 1.82 | 2.63 | 1.89 | 1.98 |
Note: HR, heart rate; QT, TQ, RR, ECG electrical intervals; QTc, TQc, RRc, ECG-corrected ECG electrical intervals; SD, standard deviation; Min, minimum value; Max, maximum value; CV, coefficient of variation, n, group size.
Correlation output (Pearson’s correlation coefficient R) between the recorded variables and level of statistical significance p (n = 50).
| Variable | W | H | BMI | BFP | HR | QT | TQ | QTc | TQc | RR | TQ/QT | RR/TQ | TQc/QTc | RRc/TQc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.00 | |||||||||||||
|
| 0.50 * | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
|
| 0.88 * | 0.03 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
|
| 0.30 * | −0.49 * | 0.61 * | 1.00 | ||||||||||
|
| 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 1.00 | |||||||||
|
| −0.06 | −0.26 | 0.10 | 0.33 * | −0.65 * | 1.00 | ||||||||
|
| −0.14 | 0.05 | −0.17 | −0.23 | −0.96 * | 0.50 * | 1.00 | |||||||
|
| 0.11 | −0.27 | 0.28 * | 0.55 * | 0.42 * | 0.41 * | −0.58 * | 1.00 | ||||||
|
| −0.11 | 0.27 | −0.28 * | −0.55 * | −0.42 * | −0.41 * | 0.58 * | −1.00 * | 1.00 | |||||
|
| −0.13 | −0.02 | −0.12 | −0.13 | −0.98 * | 0.65 * | 0.98 * | −0.42 * | 0.42 * | 1.00 | ||||
|
| −0.15 | 0.13 | −0.23 | −0.37 * | −0.87 * | 0.22 | 0.95 * | −0.80 * | 0.80 * | 0.88 * | 1.00 | |||
|
| 0.20 | −0.11 | 0.28 | 0.40 * | 0.84 * | −0.15 | −0.89 * | 0.82 * | −0.82 * | −0.81 * | −0.95 * | 1.00 | ||
|
| −0.10 | 0.27 | −0.27 | −0.54 * | −0.42 * | −0.41 | 0.58 * | −0.99 * | 0.99 * | 0.41 * | 0.80 * | −0.80 * | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.12 | −0.27 | 0.29 * | 0.54 * | 0.42 | 0.40 | −0.58 * | 1.00 * | −1.00 * | −0.42 * | −0.78 * | 0.83 * | −0.98 * | 1.00 |
Note: W, weight; H, height; BMI, body mass index; BFP, body fat percentage; HR, heart rate; QT, TQ, RR, ECG electrical intervals; QTc, TQc, RRc, ECG-corrected electrical intervals; * p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (2-tailed); n, group size.
Model summary, ANOVA report, and coefficients for simple linear regression analysis—BFP versus electrical ventricular parameters (n = 50).
| Variable | R | R Square | Adjusted R Square | SE | F |
| β0 | SE |
| 95% LB | 95% UB | β1 | SE |
| 95% LB | 95% UB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.55 | 0.3 | 0.29 | 24.48 | 20.52 | 0.001 | 339.5 | 11.63 | 0.001 | 316.12 | 362.88 | 1.79 | 0.4 | 0.001 | 1 | 2.6 |
|
| 0.55 | 0.3 | 0.29 | 24.48 | 20.52 | 0.001 | 660.5 | 11.63 | 0.001 | 637.12 | 683.88 | −1.79 | 0.4 | 0.001 | −2.59 | −1 |
|
| 0.54 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.15 | 19.88 | 0.001 | 1.89 | 0.07 | 0.001 | 1.75 | 2.04 | −0.11 | 0.003 | 0.001 | −0.16 | −0.006 |
|
| 0.54 | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 20.03 | 0.001 | 1.5 | 0.03 | 0.001 | 1.43 | 1.57 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.007 |
Note: QTc, TQc, RRc, ECG-corrected electrical intervals; R, Pearson’s coefficient of correlation; SE, standard error; F, test for overall significance for the linear model; p, level of statistical significance; β0, the intercept coefficient; β1, the regression coefficient; 95% LB and 95% UB, lower bound and upper bound of the 95% confidence interval; n, group size.