| Literature DB >> 36078418 |
Weng Li1, Yasmin Jahan1, Madoka Kawai1, Yasuko Fukushima1, Kana Kazawa1,2, Michiko Moriyama1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improving the labor productivity of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is essential because of the aging population and predicted reduction in the labor force. Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that employees are in good health to work for long times. In this regard, the purpose of the study is to investigate the relationship between work engagement (WE) and related variables among SME employees.Entities:
Keywords: health and productivity management; health literacy; job satisfaction; small and medium-sized enterprises; work engagement
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36078418 PMCID: PMC9518498 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1A Conceptual framework of this study.
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants of three companies (n = 377).
| Total | Company A ( | Company B ( | Company | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables |
| |||||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 228 (60.5) | 80 (81.6) | 21 (15.6) | 127 (88.2) | <0.001 ☨ | |
| Female | 149 (39.5) | 18 (18.4) | 114 (84.4) | 17 (11.8) | ||
| Age group (year) | ||||||
| <20 | 3 (0.8) | 0 | 3 (2.2) | 0 | <0.001 ☆ | |
| 20–29 | 20 (5.3) | 9 (9.2) | 10 (7.4) | 1 (0.7) | ||
| 30–39 | 54 (14.3) | 29 (29.6) | 20 (14.8) | 5 (3.5) | ||
| 40–49 | 104 (27.6) | 34 (34.7) | 41 (30.4) | 29 (20.1) | ||
| 50–59 | 100 (26.5) | 17 (17.3) | 34 (25.2) | 49 (34.0) | ||
| 60–69 | 76 (20.2) | 9 (9.2) | 27 (20) | 40 (27.8) | ||
| 70–79 | 20 (5.3) | 0 | 0 | 20 (13.9) | ||
| Marital status | ||||||
| Single | 112 (29.7) | 36 (36.7) | 39 (28.9) | 37 (25.7) | 0.176 ☨ | |
| Married | 265 (70.3) | 62 (63.3) | 96 (71.1) | 107 (74.3) | ||
| Years of employment | ||||||
| <1 | 39 (10.3) | 8 (8.2) | 14 (10.4) | 17 (11.8) | 0.659 ☆ | |
| <3 | 51 (13.5) | 12 (12.2) | 15 (11.1) | 24 (16.7) | ||
| <6 | 65 (17.2) | 12 (12.2) | 25 (18.5) | 28 (19.4) | ||
| <10 | 57 (15.1) | 12 (12.2) | 17 (12.6) | 28 (19.4) | ||
| <15 | 82 (21.8) | 21 (21.4) | 45 (33.3) | 16 (11.1) | ||
| <20 | 36 (9.5) | 14 (14.3) | 10 (7.4) | 12 (8.3) | ||
| ≥20 | 47 (12.5) | 19 (19.4) | 9 (6.7) | 19 (13.2) | ||
| Position/Job type | ||||||
| Manager | 45 (11.9) | 25 (25.5) | 4 (3.0) | 16 (11.1) | <0.001 ☨ | |
| Engineer | 6 (1.6) | 1 (1.0) | 5 (3.7) | 0 | ||
| Clerical work | 41 (10.9) | 26 (26.5) | 1 (0.7) | 14 (9.7) | ||
| Sales | 74 (19.6) | 14 (14.3) | 59 (43.7) | 1 (0.7) | ||
| Service | 62 (16.4) | 4 (4.1) | 33 (24.4) | 25 (17.4) | ||
| Production | 13 (3.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Mailing/Mechanical driving | 71 (18.8) | 9 (9.2) | 13 (9.6) | 62 (43.1) | ||
| Production process | 6 (1.6) | 0 | 6 (4.4) | 0 | ||
| Transportation/Cleaning/Packaging | 16 (4.2) | 8 (8.2) | 5 (3.7) | 3 (2.1) | ||
| Others | 33 (8.8) | 9 (9.2) | 9 (6.7) | 15 (10.4) | ||
| Missing value | 10 | |||||
| Physical activity level | ||||||
| level 1 | 64 (17.0) | 12 (12.2) | 6 (4.4) | 46 (31.9) | <0.001 ☆ | |
| level 2 | 170 (45.1) | 37 (37.8) | 46 (34.1) | 87 (60.4) | ||
| level 3 | 126 (33.4) | 44 (44.9) | 79 (58.5) | 3 (2.1) | ||
| Missing value | 17 | 5 | 4 | 8 | ||
☨: Chi-square test, ☆: Kruskal–Wallis. Company A, wholesale; Company B, supermarket; Company C, taxi.
The score of participant scales and its comparison between three companies.
| Company | Work | Health Literacy | Quality of Sleep | Concern for Own Body b | Job Satisfaction | Family Life Satisfaction | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UWESa | HLS-EU-Q47 b | PSQI b | BJSQ b | |||||||||
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | |||||||
| A: | 3.12 ± 1.07 |
| 26.50 ± 10.10 | n.s. | 5.61 ± 2.60 |
| 7.35 ± 2.25 | n.s. | 2.16 ± 0.74 | n.s. | 1.78 ± 0.75 | n.s. |
| B: | 3.12 ± 1.05 | 28.18 ± 9.05 | 5.58 ± 2.91 | 7.36 ± 2.11 | 2.27 ± 0.84 | 1.90 ± 0.92 | ||||||
| C: | 3.64 ± 1.18 | 28.18 ± 9.69 | 4.03 ± 2.56 | 6.97 ± 2.26 | 2.12 ± 0.83 | 1.88 ± 0.84 | ||||||
| Total: 377 | 3.32 ± 1.13 | 27.74 ± 9.58 | 4.99 ± 2.80 | 7.20 ± 2.21 | 2.18 ± 0.81 | 1.86 ± 0.85 | ||||||
| Cronbach’s α | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.76 | - | - | - | ||||||
(a): Multiple comparisons (Tukey) (b): Kruskal–Wallis, *** p < 0.001, n.s.—not significant. A (Company = A), wholesale; B (Company B), supermarket; C (Company C), taxi. UWES—Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. The higher the score, the higher the engagement. PSQI—Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The lower the score, the higher the Quality of sleep. The cutoff point is 5.5. HLS-EU-Q47—European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire. The higher the total score, the higher the health literacy. Concern for own body: The higher the score, the higher the satisfaction level. BJSQ—Brief Job Stress Questionnaire. The lower the score, the higher the satisfaction level.
Comparison of health literacy levels and sleep disorders among three companies.
| Total | Company | Company | Company | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables |
| ||||
| Quality of sleep (PSQI) | |||||
| ≤5 | 230 (61.0) | 49 (50.0) | 74 (54.8) | 107 (74.3) | <0.001 ☨ |
| >5 | 147 (39.0) | 49 (50.0) | 61 (45.2) | 37 (25.7) | |
| Health literacy (HLS-EU-Q47) | |||||
| ≤33 | 273 (72.4) | 73 (74.5) | 96 (71.1) | 104 (72.2) | 0.848 ☨ |
| >33 | 104 (27.6) | 25 (25.5) | 39 (28.9) | 40 (27.8) | |
☨ Chi-square test. Company A, wholesale; Company B, supermarket; Company C, taxi. PSQI: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. The lower the score, the higher the Quality of sleep. The cutoff point is 5.5. HLS-EU-Q47: European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire. The higher the total score, the higher the health literacy.
Stepwise multiple regression analysis for Work Engagement.
| Variables | RC | SRC | 95% CI |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job satisfaction | −0.53 | −0.38 | −0.65 | −0.4 | <0.001 |
| Age | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 0.32 | <0.001 |
| HLS-EU-Q47 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.03 | <0.001 |
| PSQI | −0.05 | −0.11 | −0.08 | −0.01 | 0.010 |
HLS-EU-Q47—European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire. PSQI—Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
Impacts of health literacy on other variables among three companies.
| HL Scores | UWES a | PSQI b | Concern for Own Body b | Job Satisfaction b | Family Life Satisfaction b | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||||||
| HL score ≤ 33 | 3.16 ± 1.07 |
| 6.32 ± 2.87 |
| 6.96 ± 2.11 |
| 2.27 ± 0.79 |
| 1.93 ± 0.83 |
|
| HL score > 33 | 3.73 ± 1.19 | 4.14 ± 2.43 | 7.84 ± 2.34 | 1.96 ± 0.82 | 1.66 ± 0.86 | |||||
(a): t-test, (b): Mann–Whitney U test. p-value: *** p < 0.001. Company A, wholesale; Company B, supermarket; Company C, taxi. Work engagement: UWES; Quality of sleep: PSQI; HL: HLS-EU-Q47.