| Literature DB >> 36078363 |
Savina Ditommaso1, Monica Giacomuzzi1, Gabriele Memoli1, Jacopo Garlasco1, Antonio Curtoni2, Marco Iannaccone2, Carla M Zotti1.
Abstract
The isolation of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) from cultures is particularly laborious due to the potential overgrowth of coexisting non-acid fast bacilli. To reduce the overgrowth of these non-mycobacterial organisms, a decontamination step with NaOH or cetylpyridinium chloride is highly recommended before plating the samples on the culture medium. However, due to their toxicity, decontamination solutions tend to decrease NTM recovery from clinical and environmental samples. Here, we tested an alternative method for NTM recovery based on the use of NTM Elite agar, a selective medium that does not require a decontamination step. Using NTM Elite agar, we were able to detect non-tuberculous mycobacteria in 27.7% (30/108) of water samples analyzed. The average time to NTM detection was 18 days, but some strains required longer to grow, perhaps due to the stressful environmental conditions (periodical disinfection of devices). NTM Elite agar's effectiveness in inhibiting background flora was proven by the isolation of NTM from samples with and without background flora, showing no statistically significant differences in detection rates for different total viable counts of background flora (p = 0.4989). In conclusion, our findings indicate that effective NTM recovery from HCU- and ECMO-derived water samples can be achieved via filtration and direct culture of the filters on NTM Elite agar. This simple procedure can speed up laboratory work and provide an improved method, successfully resulting in low contamination and high detection rate, in addition to being less time-consuming. Its sensitivity and lack of a decontamination step make this protocol particularly useful for monitoring the effectiveness of device disinfection in hospital settings, even in the presence of low NTM loads. Reading timeframes should probably be extended to 7 weeks (i.e., well beyond the standard 4 weeks advised by the manufacturer), in order to isolate even the slow-growing mycobacteria. However, an extended incubation period is not necessary for exclusion of M. chimaera contamination of the devices, as M. chimaera isolation times do not generally exceed 3 weeks.Entities:
Keywords: culture media; extracorporeal membrane oxygenations; heater–cooler; non-tuberculous mycobacteria; water filtration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36078363 PMCID: PMC9518321 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191710645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
NTM isolation by sampling source.
| Sampling Source | NTM Positive (%) | NTM Negative (%) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stockert 3T HCU | 14 (31.1) | 31 (68.9) | 45 |
| Maquet HCU40 | 12 (27.3) | 32 (72.7) | 44 |
| Maquet ECMO | 2 (15.4) | 11(84.6) | 13 |
| Sink | 2 * (33.3) | 4 (66.7) | 6 |
|
| 30 | 78 | 108 |
* Analyses allowed highlighting damage of the POU filters, which was responsible for contamination of 4 devices in the hospital.
Comparison of results relative to the three microbiological parameters examined (NTM, TVCs, and P. aeruginosa).
| TVCs |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 16 (27.6) | 8 (44.4) | 1 (16.7) | 2 (40.0) | 1 (7.7) | 1 (11.1) | 27 (29.7) |
|
| 41 (70.7) | 10 (55.6) | 5 (83.3) | 3 (60.0) | 4 (30.8) | 3 (33.3) | 60 (65.9) |
|
| 1 (1.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (61.5) | 5 (55.6) | 4 (4.4) |
|
| 58 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 13 | 9 | 91 |
TVC: total viable count. Both TVCs (22 °C and 36 °C). At least one of the two TVCs (22 °C and 36 °C) or both within the limit assigned. (Fisher test for NTM-positive vs. NTM-negative by TVCs: p = 0.4989). (Fisher test for NTM-positive vs. NTM-negative by presence of P. aeruginosa: p = 1).
Figure 1Proportions of samples with detected NTM according to counts of contaminating bacteria. The x-axis is represented by total viable counts (TVCs) (i.e., contaminating bacteria) and expressed on a logarithmic scale. The red line represents the trend identified by LOESS regression, while the shaded area depicts its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).
Distribution of microbial flora results observed on NTM Elite agar (non-AFB) and TVCs counted on yeast extract agar.
| TVCs | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 41 (70.7) | 8 (44.4) | 4 (66.7) | 2 (40.0) | 2 (15.4) | 57 |
|
| 0 (0.0) | 2 (11.1) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) | 2 (15.4) | 6 |
|
| 16 (27.6) | 7 (38.9) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (20.0) | 1 (7.7) | 26 |
|
| 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.6) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 |
|
| 1 (1.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (61.5) | 9 |
|
| 58 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 13 | 100 |
TVC: total viable count. Both TVCs (22 °C and 36 °C). At least one of the two TVCs (22 °C and 36 °C) or both within the limit assigned.
Comparison of NTM Elite agar unreadable plates and TVCs/P. aeruginosa.
| Brand | Type of Samples | NTM ELITE | TVCs 22 °C CFU/mL | TVCs 36 °C CFU/mL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stockert 3T HCUs | pre-disinfection | non-AFB | >3 × 103 | >3 × 103 | <1 |
| 2 | Stockert 3T HCUs | pre-disinfection | non-AFB | >3 × 103 | >3 × 103 | >150 |
| 3 | Stockert 3T HCUs | post-disinfection | moulds | <1 | <1 | <1 |
| 4 | Stockert 3T HCUs | pre-disinfection | non-AFB | >3 × 103 | >3 × 103 | >150 |
| 5 | Stockert 3T HCUs | pre-disinfection | non-AFB | >3 × 103 | >3 × 103 | >150 |
| 6 | Stockert 3T HCUs | pre-disinfection | non-AFB | >3 × 103 | >3 × 103 | >150 |
| 7 | Stockert 3T HCUs | pre-disinfection | moulds | >3 × 103 | >3 × 103 | <1 |
| 8 | Stockert 3T HCUs | pre-disinfection | non-AFB | >3 × 103 | >3 × 103 | <1 |
| 9 | Stockert 3T HCUs | pre-disinfection | non-AFB | >3 × 103 | >3 × 103 | 15 |
non-AFB: non-acid fast bacilli; TVC: total viable count; <1: not detected.
Figure 2Results of six proficiency samples plated on NTM Elite agar.
Proficiency testing results (source: FEPTU report provided to laboratories that examine heater cooler unit (HCU) waters for Mycobacterium spp.)
| Number of Distribution | Microorganism Strains by Each Distribution | CFU/100 mL |
|---|---|---|
| MY006 A |
| 14 |
|
| (1.1 × 102) | |
| MY006 B |
| 2.2 × 102 |
|
| (1.5 × 102) | |
| MY008 A |
| 5.0 × 102 |
|
| (20) | |
|
| (42) | |
| MY008 B |
| 8.0 × 102 |
| MY009 A |
| 5.8 × 10 |
|
| (90) | |
| MY009 B |
| 30 |