| Literature DB >> 36078159 |
Catarina Micaelo-Fernandes1, Joseph Bouskila1, Roberta M Palmour2,3, Jean-François Bouchard1, Maurice Ptito1,4.
Abstract
Among the deficits in visual processing that accompany healthy aging, the earliest originate in the retina. Moreover, sex-related differences in retinal function have been increasingly recognized. To better understand the dynamics of the retinal aging trajectory, we used the light-adapted flicker electroretinogram (ERG) to functionally assess the state of the neuroretina in a large cohort of age- and sex-matched vervet monkeys (N = 35), aged 9 to 28 years old, with no signs of obvious ocular pathology. We primarily isolated the cone-bipolar axis by stimulating the retina with a standard intensity light flash (2.57 cd/s/m2) at eight different frequencies, ranging from 5 to 40 Hz. Sex-specific changes in the voltage and temporal characteristics of the flicker waveform were found in older individuals (21-28 years-old, N = 16), when compared to younger monkeys (9-20 years-old, N = 19), across all stimulus frequencies tested. Specifically, significantly prolonged implicit times were observed in older monkeys (p < 0.05), but a significant reduction of the amplitude of the response was only found in old male monkeys (p < 0.05). These changes might reflect ongoing degenerative processes targeting the retinal circuitry and the cone subsystem in particular. Altogether, our findings corroborate the existing literature in humans and other species, where aging detrimentally affects photopic retinal responses, and draw attention to the potential contribution of different hormonal environments.Entities:
Keywords: age; aging; cones; electroretinogram; retina; sex; vervet monkey
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36078159 PMCID: PMC9454622 DOI: 10.3390/cells11172751
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 7.666
Figure 1Distribution of the intraocular pressure in the tested monkeys by age (A) and by age and sex (B). No significant differences are found for any of the comparisons.
Figure 2Frequency-amplitude (A) and frequency-implicit time (B) functions show differences in the flicker ERG stimulus-response characteristics between younger (9–20 years old) and older (21+ years old) monkeys. Responses were elicited at eight different flash frequencies. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05.
Figure 3Sex-specific differences in the amplitude of the flicker ERG response with aging. The amplitude of the retinal response elicited at eight different flash frequencies is reduced in old males compared to young males (A), but it remains unaltered in old females compared to young females (B). Error bars represent standard errors of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05.
Figure 4(A). Representative flicker ERG traces of a young male subject (light green) and an old male subject (dark green). Note the decrease in the amplitude of the response with aging. (B). Representative flicker ERG traces of a young female (pink) and an old female (red) subjects.