Literature DB >> 17273847

Evidence of a possible impact of the menstrual cycle on the reproducibility of scotopic ERGs in women.

Julie Brûlé1, Marie-Pier Lavoie, Christian Casanova, Pierre Lachapelle, Marc Hébert.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of gender and menstrual cycle on the electroretinogram (ERG). Photopic and scotopic ERGs were obtained in 14 females during the luteal and follicular phases of their menstrual cycle and compared to those obtained on two separate (7 days or 14 days apart) sessions from seven age-matched control male subjects. Our results confirm that the amplitude of the photopic ERGs of females is significantly (P < 0.05) larger than males, and this, irrespective of the cycle phase. In comparison, scotopic ERGs revealed significant male-female differences only during the follicular phase. While in males, no significant (P > 0.05) intersession (7 day or 14 day intervals) variability could be demonstrated, significant (P < 0.001) intersession (luteal-follicular) variability was observed in the scotopic ERGs of our female participants, with 8 of the 14 women, demonstrating a marked increase of 20.17 +/- 4.8% in the follicular ERG compared to the luteal. Our data suggests there should be separate normal ERG values for men and women and that the phase of the menstrual cycle should be taken into consideration when interpreting the ERG results from women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17273847     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-007-9045-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   1.854


  44 in total

1.  The photopic hill: a new phenomenon of the light adapted electroretinogram.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Properties of the human cone system electroretinogram during light adaptation.

Authors:  N S Peachey; K R Alexander; G A Fishman; D J Derlacki
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1989-03-15       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  The use of electroretinography in measuring the effect of vasodilation.

Authors:  H E HENKES
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1951-04       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  The clinical electroretinogram. I. The normal electroretinogram above fifty years of age.

Authors:  G KARPE; K RICKENBACH; S THOMASSON
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1950

5.  Fundus pigmentation and the electroretinographic luminance-response function.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  The oscillatory potentials of the mudpuppy retina.

Authors:  L Wachtmeister; J E Dowling
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The clinical electroretinogram; II. The difference between the electroretinogram in men and in women.

Authors:  B VAINIO-MATTILA
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1951

8.  Risk factors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-12

9.  Daily fluctuations in the detectability of dim lights by humans.

Authors:  C J Bassi; M K Powers
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1986

10.  Menopause and tear function: the influence of prolactin and sex hormones on human tear production.

Authors:  W D Mathers; D Stovall; J A Lane; M B Zimmerman; S Johnson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  15 in total

1.  The color appearance of stimuli detected via short-wavelength-sensitive cones: comparisons with visual adaptation and visual field data for peri- or post-menopausal women under 70 years of age.

Authors:  Alvin Eisner; Maureen D Toomey
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Schizophrenia and the retina: Towards a 2020 perspective.

Authors:  Steven M Silverstein; Samantha I Fradkin; Docia L Demmin
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Neurodegenerative differences in the retinas of male and female patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Glen Y Ozawa; Marcus A Bearse; Kevin W Bronson-Castain; Wendy W Harrison; Marilyn E Schneck; Shirin Barez; Anthony J Adams
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Light- and dark-adapted electroretinograms (ERGs) and ocular pigmentation: comparison of brown- and blue-eyed cohorts.

Authors:  Abdlsaed Al Abdlseaed; Yvonne McTaggart; Thomas Ramage; Ruth Hamilton; Daphne L McCulloch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Differences in neuroretinal function between adult males and females.

Authors:  Glen Y Ozawa; Marcus A Bearse; Wendy W Harrison; Kevin W Bronson-Castain; Marilyn E Schneck; Shirin Barez; Anthony J Adams
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Differences in Retinal Structure and Function between Aging Male and Female Sprague-Dawley Rats are Strongly Influenced by the Estrus Cycle.

Authors:  Samaneh Chaychi; Anna Polosa; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Is dopamine transporter-mediated dopaminergic signaling in the retina a noninvasive biomarker for attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder? A study in a novel dopamine transporter variant Val559 transgenic mouse model.

Authors:  Heng Dai; Chad R Jackson; Gwynne L Davis; Randy D Blakely; Douglas G McMahon
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Electroretinographic Abnormalities and Sex Differences Detected with Mesopic Adaptation in a Mouse Model of Schizophrenia: A and B Wave Analysis.

Authors:  Nathalia Torres Jimenez; Justin W Lines; Rachel B Kueppers; Paulo Kofuji; Henry Wei; Amy Rankila; Joseph T Coyle; Robert F Miller; Linda K McLoon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Effects of DTL electrode position on the amplitude and implicit time of the electroretinogram.

Authors:  Anna H Brouwer; Gerard C de Wit; Joke H de Boer; Maria M van Genderen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Electroretinographic modifications induced by agomelatine: a novel avenue to the understanding of the claimed antidepressant effect of the drug?

Authors:  Michele Fornaro; Fabio Bandini; Luca Cestari; Christian Cordano; Carla Ogliastro; Claudio Albano; Domenico De Berardis; Matteo Martino; Andrea Escelsior; Giulio Rocchi; Pantaleo Fornaro; Concetta De Pasquale
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.