| Literature DB >> 35511377 |
Anthony G Robson1,2, Laura J Frishman3, John Grigg4, Ruth Hamilton5,6, Brett G Jeffrey7, Mineo Kondo8, Shiying Li9,10, Daphne L McCulloch11.
Abstract
The full-field electroretinogram (ERG) is a mass electrophysiological response to diffuse flashes of light and is used widely to assess generalized retinal function. This document, from the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV), presents an updated and revised ISCEV Standard for clinical ERG testing. Minimum protocols for basic ERG stimuli, recording methods and reporting are specified, to promote consistency of methods for diagnosis, monitoring and inter-laboratory comparisons, while also responding to evolving clinical practices and technology. The main changes in this updated ISCEV Standard for clinical ERGs include specifying that ERGs may meet the Standard without mydriasis, providing stimuli adequately compensate for non-dilated pupils. There is more detail about analysis of dark-adapted oscillatory potentials (OPs) and the document format has been updated and supplementary content reduced. There is a more detailed review of the origins of the major ERG components. Several tests previously tabulated as additional ERG protocols are now cited as published ISCEV extended protocols. A non-standard abbreviated ERG protocol is described, for use when patient age, compliance or other circumstances preclude ISCEV Standard ERG testing.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical standards; Electroretinogram (ERG); Full-field ERG; International Society of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV)
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35511377 PMCID: PMC9192408 DOI: 10.1007/s10633-022-09872-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Doc Ophthalmol ISSN: 0012-4486 Impact factor: 1.854
Stimulus and recording parameters for the ISCEV Standard ERG protocol. Acceptable ranges are defined as ± 10% of nominal values, on a logarithmic scale for flash strengths. For scotopic flash strengths, a scotopic:photopic ratio of 2.5 has been assumed, being typical of xenon flashtubes and therefore providing longitudinal consistency with the extent of rod system stimulation
| Type of adaptation; duration of adaptation; abbreviation | Flash strength (acceptable range) | Inter-stimulus interval (frequency) | Recording band pass | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Photopic (phot cd·s·m−2) | Scotopic (scot cd·s·m−2) | High pass | Low pass | ||
| Dark; ≥ 20 min; DA 0.01 ERG | 0.01 | 0.025 | ≥ 2 s | ≤ 0.3 Hz | ≥ 300 Hz |
| (0.0063–0.016) | (0.017–0.036) | (≤ 0.5 Hz) | |||
| Dark; ≥ 20 min; DA 3 ERG | 3 | 7.5 | ≥ 10 s | ≤ 0.3 Hz | ≥ 300 Hz |
| (2.7–3.3) | (6.1–9.2) | (≤ 0.1 Hz) | |||
| Dark; ≥ 20 min; DA 10 ERG | 10 | 25 | ≥ 20 s | ≤ 0.3 Hz | ≥ 300 Hz |
| (7.9–13) | (18–34) | (≤ 0.05 Hz) | |||
| Dark; ≥ 20 min; DA 3 or 10 OPs | as for DA 3 or 10 ERGs | as for DA 3 or 10 ERGs | as for DA 3 or 10 ERGs | 75 Hz | ≥ 300 Hz |
| Light 30 cd·m−2; ≥ 10 min; LA 3 ERG | 3 | ≥ 0.5 s | ≤ 0.3 Hz | ≥ 300 Hz | |
| (2.7–3.3) | (≤ 2 Hz) | ||||
| Light 30 cd·m−2; ≥ 10 min; LA 30 Hz ERG | 3 | 30.0 – 36.7 ms | ≤ 0.3 Hz | ≥ 300 Hz | |
| (2.7–3.3) | (27 – 33 Hz | ||||
Fig. 1The six ERGs defined by the ISCEV Standard, recorded in this example using a corneal recording electrode. Bold arrows indicate the stimulus flash. The convention is shown for measuring amplitudes (solid vertical lines) and peak times (t; broken horizontal lines) of the standard ERG components, including a-waves and b-waves of dark-adapted (DA) and light-adapted (LA) single flash responses. The amplitude of the LA 30 Hz ERG is measured from trough to peak of a typical wave. The waveforms are examples and do not indicate minimum, maximum or typical values, nor do they show replications as required for reporting