| Literature DB >> 36077624 |
Erica Huang1, Joshua Tran1, Linda My Huynh2, Douglas Skarecky1, Robert H Wilson3, Thomas Ahlering1.
Abstract
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP) has a limited ability to predict prostate cancer (PC) progression, leading to overtreatment, decreased quality of life, and additional expenses. Previously, we established that one-third of men with BCR in our group experienced low-risk recurrences that were safely observed without treatment. Our retrospective cohort analysis of 407 BCR patients post RP validates the use of PSA doubling time (DT) kinetics to direct active observation (AO) versus treatment following RP. The primary outcome was no need for treatment according to the predictive value of models of ROC analysis. The secondary outcome was PC-specific mortality (PCSM) according to Kaplan-Meier analysis. A total of 1864 men underwent RP (June 2002-September 2019); 407 experienced BCR (PSA > 0.2 ng/dL, ×2), with a median follow-up of 7.6 years. In adjusted regression analysis, initial PSADT > 12 months and increasing DT were significant predictors for AO (p < 0.001). This model (initial PSADT and DT change) was an excellent predictor of AO in ROC analysis (AUC = 0.83). No patients with initial PSADT > 12 months and increasing DT experienced PCSM. In conclusion, the combination of PSADT > 12 months and increasing DT was an excellent predictor of AO. This is the first demonstration that one-third of BCRs are at low risk of PCSM and can be managed without treatment via DT kinetics.Entities:
Keywords: PSA; biochemical recurrence; decision analysis; prostate cancer; surgical therapy
Year: 2022 PMID: 36077624 PMCID: PMC9454714 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174087
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.575
Demographics of BCR patients in the AO (N = 136) and treatment (n = 271) groups.
| Treatment | No Trmt | Trmt | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| N, all patients | 136 (33.4%) | 271 (66.6%) | 407 (100%) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age, years | 63.5 (7.3) | 63.8 (7.2) | 63.7 (7.3) | 0.677 |
| Adj pre-PSA, ng/mL | 8.4 (5.7) | 12.6 (16.9) | 11.2 (14.3) | 0.005 |
| SHIM | 19.8 (7.1) | 17.9 (7.5) | 18.6 (7.4) | 0.023 |
| EBL | 102.2 (48.4) | 96.2 (37.7) | 98.2 (41.7) | 0.171 |
| BMI | 27.0 (3.8) | 27.3 (3.8) | 27.2 (3.8) | 0.467 |
| Prostate weight | 51.4 (21.3) | 53.5 (19.4) | 52.8 (20.1) | 0.337 |
| Follow-up, years | 7.5 (4.0) | 7.7 (4.4) | 7.6 (4.3) | 0.688 |
| Time to death, years | 6.9 (2.7) | 7.8 (4.0) | 7.6 (3.8) | 0.426 |
| Time to earliest treatment | NA | 3.0 (7.7) | 3.0 (7.7) | |
| Current PSADT, months | 26.0 (19.9) | 8.5 (9.1) | 15.6 (16.9) | <0.001 |
| PSADT after 0.2, months | 39.4 (294.9) | 12.6 (48.4) | 23.6 (192.6) | 0.272 |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Margins | 36 (26.5%) | 109 (40.2%) | 145 (35.6%) | 0.006 |
| p-stage | <0.001 | |||
| pT2 | 67 (49.3%) | 70 (25.8%) | 137 (33.7%) | |
| pT3/T4 | 69 (50.7%) | 201 (74.2%) | 270 (66.3%) | |
| Gleason grade group (GGG) | <0.001 | |||
| 1 | 17 (12.5%) | 4 (1.5%) | 21 (5.2%) | |
| 2 | 48 (35.3%) | 52 (19.2%) | 100 (24.6%) | |
| 3 | 43 (31.6%) | 79 (29.2%) | 122 (30.0%) | |
| 4 | 17 (12.5%) | 22 (8.1%) | 39 (9.6%) | |
| 5 | 11 (8.1%) | 114 (42.1%) | 125 (30.7%) | |
| PSADT > 0.2 group, months | <0.001 | |||
| >12 | 90 (73.8%) | 37 (22.6%) | 127 (44.4%) | |
| 6 to 12 | 19 (15.6%) | 48 (29.3%) | 67 (23.4%) | |
| <6 | 13 (10.7%) | 79 (48.2%) | 92 (32.2%) | |
| NA | 14 * | 107 ** | 121 | |
| DT pattern | <0.001 | |||
| Increasing | 96 (72.7%) | 49 (32.7%) | 142 (50.7%) | |
| Decreasing | 36 (27.3%) | 101 (67.3%) | 138 (49.3%) | |
| NA | 4 *** | 121 ** | 127 | |
| PCSM | 0 (0.0%) | 29 (10.7%) | 29 (7.1%) | <0.001 |
| Dead | 13 (9.6%) | 50 (18.5%) | 63 (15.5%) | 0.019 |
* Not enough PSAs prior to non-cancer specific death (n = 2), not enough PSAs post-BCR to establish PSA (n = 12). ** No PSADT as treatment was initiated based on very rapid PSA progression. *** Not enough PSAs prior to non-cancer specific death (n = 2), lost to follow-up (n = 1), and after BCR (n = 1).
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival and prostate-cancer-specific survival in the active observation (n = 136) and treatment (n = 271) groups.
Full univariate (A) and multivariate (B) regression analysis in all BCR patients (n = 407) for no treatment and for initial PSADT (C) and DT pattern (D) models alone.
| Outcome: No Treatment | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| References | Estimated OR (95% CI) | |
| PSADT binary | >12 months vs. <12 months [ref] | 8.79 (4.92, 15.71) | <0.001 |
| DT pattern | Increasing vs. decreasing [ref] | 6.08 (3.48, 10.62) | <0.001 |
| GGG | 4–5 vs. 1–3 [ref] | 0.29 (0.17, 0.52) | 0.04 |
| Preoperative PSA (continuous) | 0.95 (0.91, 0.99) | 0.204 | |
| P-stage | pT3/4 vs. pT2 [ref] | 0.63 (0.38, 1.05) | 0.639 |
| Age (continuous) | 0.9873 (0.9518, 1.0242) | 0.985 | |
|
| Estimated OR (95% CI) | ||
| PSADT binary | >12 months vs. <12 months [ref] | 8.93 (4.53, 17.6) | <0.001 |
| DT Pattern | Increasing vs. decreasing [ref] | 5.49 (2.81, 10.71) | <0.001 |
|
| Estimated OR (95% CI) | ||
| PSADT binary | >12 months vs. <12 months [ref] | 8.74 (5, 15.28) | <0.001 |
|
| Estimated OR (95% CI) | ||
| DT pattern | Increasing vs. decreasing [ref] | 5 (2.95, 8.48) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
Figure 2Tree diagram demonstrating PCSM by first initial PSADT after BCR, with the subsequent DT pattern.