Literature DB >> 33002429

Timing of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy (RADICALS-RT): a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial.

Christopher C Parker1, Noel W Clarke2, Adrian D Cook3, Howard G Kynaston4, Peter Meidahl Petersen5, Charles Catton6, William Cross7, John Logue8, Wendy Parulekar9, Heather Payne10, Rajendra Persad11, Holly Pickering3, Fred Saad12, Juliette Anderson13, Amit Bahl14, David Bottomley15, Klaus Brasso16, Rohit Chahal17, Peter W Cooke18, Ben Eddy19, Stephanie Gibbs20, Chee Goh21, Sandeep Gujral22, Catherine Heath23, Alastair Henderson24, Ramasamy Jaganathan25, Henrik Jakobsen26, Nicholas D James27, Subramanian Kanaga Sundaram28, Kathryn Lees29, Jason Lester30, Henriette Lindberg31, Julian Money-Kyrle21, Stephen Morris32, Joe O'Sullivan33, Peter Ostler34, Lisa Owen35, Prashant Patel25, Alvan Pope36, Richard Popert37, Rakesh Raman38, Martin Andreas Røder16, Ian Sayers39, Matthew Simms40, Jim Wilson41, Anjali Zarkar42, Mahesh K B Parmar3, Matthew R Sydes43.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer is uncertain. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy versus an observation policy with salvage radiotherapy for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) biochemical progression.
METHODS: We did a randomised controlled trial enrolling patients with at least one risk factor (pathological T-stage 3 or 4, Gleason score of 7-10, positive margins, or preoperative PSA ≥10 ng/mL) for biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy (RADICALS-RT). The study took place in trial-accredited centres in Canada, Denmark, Ireland, and the UK. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to adjuvant radiotherapy or an observation policy with salvage radiotherapy for PSA biochemical progression (PSA ≥0·1 ng/mL or three consecutive rises). Masking was not deemed feasible. Stratification factors were Gleason score, margin status, planned radiotherapy schedule (52·5 Gy in 20 fractions or 66 Gy in 33 fractions), and centre. The primary outcome measure was freedom from distant metastases, designed with 80% power to detect an improvement from 90% with salvage radiotherapy (control) to 95% at 10 years with adjuvant radiotherapy. We report on biochemical progression-free survival, freedom from non-protocol hormone therapy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes. Standard survival analysis methods were used. A hazard ratio (HR) of less than 1 favoured adjuvant radiotherapy. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00541047.
FINDINGS: Between Nov 22, 2007, and Dec 30, 2016, 1396 patients were randomly assigned, 699 (50%) to salvage radiotherapy and 697 (50%) to adjuvant radiotherapy. Allocated groups were balanced with a median age of 65 years (IQR 60-68). Median follow-up was 4·9 years (IQR 3·0-6·1). 649 (93%) of 697 participants in the adjuvant radiotherapy group reported radiotherapy within 6 months; 228 (33%) of 699 in the salvage radiotherapy group reported radiotherapy within 8 years after randomisation. With 169 events, 5-year biochemical progression-free survival was 85% for those in the adjuvant radiotherapy group and 88% for those in the salvage radiotherapy group (HR 1·10, 95% CI 0·81-1·49; p=0·56). Freedom from non-protocol hormone therapy at 5 years was 93% for those in the adjuvant radiotherapy group versus 92% for those in the salvage radiotherapy group (HR 0·88, 95% CI 0·58-1·33; p=0·53). Self-reported urinary incontinence was worse at 1 year for those in the adjuvant radiotherapy group (mean score 4·8 vs 4·0; p=0·0023). Grade 3-4 urethral stricture within 2 years was reported in 6% of individuals in the adjuvant radiotherapy group versus 4% in the salvage radiotherapy group (p=0·020).
INTERPRETATION: These initial results do not support routine administration of adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Adjuvant radiotherapy increases the risk of urinary morbidity. An observation policy with salvage radiotherapy for PSA biochemical progression should be the current standard after radical prostatectomy. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK, MRC Clinical Trials Unit, and Canadian Cancer Society.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33002429     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31553-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  48 in total

1.  Pathological stage, surgical margin and lymphovascular invasion as prognostic factors after salvage radiotherapy for post-prostatectomy relapsed prostate cancer - outcomes and optimization strategies.

Authors:  Isabel Rodrigues; Carolina Ferreira; Joana Gonçalves; Luísa Carvalho; Jorge Oliveira; Carla Castro; Ângelo Oliveira
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-08-12

2.  Postoperative moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a mono-institutional propensity-score-matching analysis between adjuvant and early-salvage radiotherapy.

Authors:  Luca Nicosia; Rosario Mazzola; Claudio Vitale; Francesco Cuccia; Vanessa Figlia; Niccolò Giaj-Levra; Francesco Ricchetti; Michele Rigo; Ruggiero Ruggeri; Stefano Cavalleri; Filippo Alongi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Lower Bladder Toxicity of Salvage Versus Adjuvant Modern Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Annamaria Vinciguerra; Antonietta Augurio; Consuelo Rosa; David Fasciolo; Marzia Borgia; Valentina Milone; Michele Marchioni; Marta DI Nicola; Domenico Genovesi; Luciana Caravatta
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 4.  Genomic biomarkers to guide precision radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Philip Sutera; Matthew P Deek; Kim Van der Eecken; Alexander W Wyatt; Amar U Kishan; Jason K Molitoris; Matthew J Ferris; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Zaker Rana; Mark V Mishra; Young Kwok; Elai Davicioni; Daniel E Spratt; Piet Ost; Felix Y Feng; Phuoc T Tran
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 4.012

5.  18F-fluciclovine-PET/CT imaging versus conventional imaging alone to guide postprostatectomy salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer (EMPIRE-1): a single centre, open-label, phase 2/3 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ashesh B Jani; Eduard Schreibmann; Subir Goyal; Raghuveer Halkar; Bruce Hershatter; Peter J Rossi; Joseph W Shelton; Pretesh R Patel; Karen M Xu; Mark Goodman; Viraj A Master; Shreyas S Joshi; Omer Kucuk; Bradley C Carthon; Mehmet A Bilen; Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo; Akinyemi A Akintayo; Vishal R Dhere; David M Schuster
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Androgen Deprivation Therapy with or Without Docetaxel in High-risk Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Surgery (TAX3503).

Authors:  Michael J Morris; Jose Mauricio Mota; Kristine Lacuna; Patrick Hilden; Martin Gleave; Michael A Carducci; Fred Saad; Erica D Cohn; Julie Filipenko; Glenn Heller; Neal Shore; Andrew J Armstrong; Howard I Scher
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 7.  Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Jeremie Calais; Stefano Fanti; Derya Tilki; Tanya Dorff; Daniel E Spratt; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Tissue-Based Biomarkers for the Risk Stratification of Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; Michael Tzeng; Patrick J Lewicki; Krishnan Patel; Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh; Siv Venkat; Jonathan E Shoag; Michael A Gorin; Christopher E Barbieri; Jim C Hu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy: What Has Changed Over Time?

Authors:  Fabio Zattoni; Isabel Heidegger; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Alexander Kretschmer; Giancarlo Marra; Alessandro Magli; Felix Preisser; Derya Tilki; Igor Tsaur; Massimo Valerio; Roderick van den Bergh; Claudia Kesch; Francesco Ceci; Christian Fankhauser; Giorgio Gandaglia
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-07-09

10.  Clinical utility of subclassifying positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Shawn Dason; Emily A Vertosick; Kazuma Udo; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; S Joseph Sirintrapun; Satish K Tickoo; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-07-11       Impact factor: 5.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.