| Literature DB >> 36077282 |
Yi-Jing Chen1, Wei-Chun Hung1, Yu-Hsiang Chou2,3, Chern-Hsiung Lai3,4, Po Peng5, Pei-Syuan Jhou1, Min-Ru Tsai1, Jim Jinn-Chyuan Sheu6,7, Jeng-Hsien Yen8,9.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and periodontitis are suggested to be closely linked based on microbial dysbiosis, but limited subgingival bacteria have been proven in the pathogenesis of RA. We enrolled 30 RA patients and 25 controls and divided them into three groups with matched age, gender, and diabetes statuses: group AM (all of the matched participants), group PD (periodontally diseased), and group PH (periodontally healthy). Their subgingival microbial composition was determined by V3-V4 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Significant differences in subgingival microbial clustering between the RA patients and controls were observed in groups AM and PD. Among the taxa enriched in RA, Aminipila butyrica and Peptococcus simiae were the only two species displaying positive correlation to the level of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) in both of the groups. Surprisingly, the median of relative abundances of A. butyrica and P. simiae were 0% in the controls of group PD. Furthermore, a gene encoding arginine deiminase with the capability to produce citrulline was addressed in the complete genome sequence of A. butyrica. This is the first study to elucidate the important roles of A. butyrica and P. simiae as periodontal bacteria leading to RA possibly through the induction of ACPA production.Entities:
Keywords: anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA); microbial dysbiosis; periodontitis; rheumatoid arthritis; subgingival microbiome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36077282 PMCID: PMC9456296 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179883
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Study design and the flowchart. A total of 42, 24, and 12 participants were eligible for the final analysis in groups AM, PD, and PH, respectively. The RA and control participants were matched on age, gender, and DM statuses.
Clinical characteristics of the RA and control participants.
| AM | PD | PH | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA | Control | RA | Control | RA | Control | ||||
| N | 21 | 21 | 12 | 12 | 6 | 6 | |||
| Age | 57.57 ± 8.06 | 57.19 ± 8.73 | 0.884 | 59.00 ± 7.80 | 58.50 ± 7.86 | 0.877 | 54.50 ± 11.66 | 53.33 ± 11.04 | 0.862 |
| Female, % | 16 (76.19) | 16 (76.19) | 1 | 9 (75) | 9 (75) | 1 | 5 (83.33) | 5 (83.33) | 1 |
| Diabetes mellitus, % | 4 (19.05) | 4 (19.05) | 1 | 2 (16.67) | 2 (16.67) | 1 | 1 (16.67) | 1 (16.67) | 1 |
| Autoantibody status | |||||||||
| RF, positive | 17 (80.95) | 2 (9.52) | <0.001 | 11 (91.67) | 1 (8.33) | <0.001 | 5 (83.33) | 1 (16.67) | 0.021 |
| ACPA, positive | 15 (71.43) | 0 (0) | <0.001 | 10 (83.33) | 0 (0) | <0.001 | 4 (66.67) | 0 (0) | 0.558 |
| ACPA, level | 54.50 | 1.00 | <0.001 | 97.50 | 0.80 | <0.001 | 142.50 | 1.20 | 0.336 |
| Periodontitis, % | 14 (66.67) | 14 (66.67) | 1 | 12 (100) | 12 (100) | 1 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 |
The data are expressed as numbers (percentages) for categorical variables and mean ± SD or median (25th, 75th percentile) for continuous variables as appropriate.
Figure 2The intra-group diversity of subgingival microbiota in groups AM, PD, and PH. (A) The number of the observed bacterial features, (B) Chao1 index, and (C) Shannon index. The RA patients are indicated in orange, and the controls are indicated in blue. The data are expressed as median (25th, 75th percentile). *, p < 0.05.
Figure 3The subgingival microbiota clustering by PCoA based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity between the RA patients (orange dots) and controls (blue triangles). (A) Group AM (ANOSIM: R = 0.177, p = 0.001 and PERMANOVA: pseudo-F = 2.561, p = 0.001), (B) group PD (ANOSIM: R = 0.15, p = 0.013 and PERMANOVA: pseudo-F = 1.722, p = 0.018), and (C) group PH (ANOSIM: R = 0.167, p = 0.116 and PERMANOVA: pseudo-F = 1.449, p = 0.076).
Correlation between the subgingival microbiota composition and ACPA levels in groups AM and PD.
| Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| AM | PD | |
|
| 0.360 (0.019) | 0.440 (0.032) |
|
| 0.464 (0.002) | 0.435 (0.033) |
|
| 0.313 (0.044) | - |
|
| 0.316 (0.041) | - |
| 0.330 (0.033) | - | |
|
| 0.617 (<0.001) | - |
| - | 0.440 (0.032) | |
| - | 0.441 (0.031) | |
| - | 0.438 (0.032) | |
|
| - | 0.524 (0.009) |
|
| - | 0.445 (0.029) |
| - | 0.456 (0.025) | |
|
| - | 0.440 (0.031) |
|
| - | 0.416 (0.043) |
|
| - | 0.542 (0.006) |
|
| - | 0.476 (0.019) |
|
| - | −0.436 (0.033) |
Correlations are reported as the Pearson correlation coefficient, and p-values are given in parentheses. Only species with p < 0.05 are listed.
Figure 4Relative abundances of (A) A. butyrica and (B) P. simiae displaying positive correlations to the ACPA levels in both of groups AM and PD. RA, the RA patients in this study; Control, the controls in this study. The data are expressed as median (25th, 75th percentile).