| Literature DB >> 31182740 |
Jôice Dias Corrêa1, Gabriel R Fernandes2, Débora Cerqueira Calderaro3, Santuza Maria Souza Mendonça1, Janine Mayra Silva1, Mayra Laino Albiero4, Fernando Q Cunha5, E Xiao6, Gilda Aparecida Ferreira3, Antônio Lúcio Teixeira3, Chiranjit Mukherjee7, Eugene J Leys7, Tarcília Aparecida Silva1, Dana T Graves8.
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by joint inflammation. Individuals with RA have a higher risk of periodontitis and periodontitis has been linked to RA through the production of enzymes by periodontal pathogens that citrullinate proteins. This linkage is supported by findings that periodontitis is associated with increased RA severity and treatment of periodontitis can improve the symptoms of RA. The possible mechanism for this association is through dysbiosis of the oral microbiota triggered by RA-induced systemic inflammation. We examined the RA status of subjects by measuring the number of tender and swollen joints, anti-citrullinated protein antibody and rheumatoid factor. Periodontal disease status and salivary cytokine levels were measured, and dental plaque analyzed by 16S rRNA high throughput sequencing. RA patients had a higher bacterial load, a more diverse microbiota, an increase in bacterial species associated with periodontal disease, more clinical attachment loss, and increased production of inflammatory mediators including IL-17, IL-2, TNF, and IFN-γ. Furthermore, changes in the oral microbiota were linked to worse RA conditions. Our study provides new insights into the bi-directional relationship between periodontitis and RA and suggest that monitoring the periodontal health of RA patients is particularly important.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31182740 PMCID: PMC6557833 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44674-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic and clinical data of patients with RA and healthy control subjects.
| Controls | RA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-CP | CP | Non-CP | CP | |
| Subjects | 27 (57.4%) | 20 (42.6%) | 21 (50%) | 21 (50%) |
| Females % | 36.5 | 48 | 53.48 | 34 |
| Age, years | 42.8 (±14.0) | 46.5 (±12.3) | 50 (±11.1) | 53 (±10.40) |
| Current Smokers | 1 (3.7%) | 2 (7.6%) | 1 (4.6%) | 1 (4.6%) |
| RA duration, years | n/a | n/a | 16.2 (±8.2) | 12.5 (±9.7) |
|
| ||||
| Tender joints | n/a | n/a | 3.2 (±4.0) | 3.3 (±4.6) |
| Swollen joints | n/a | n/a | 2.5 (±0.5) | 2.4 (±0.9) |
| DAS28 | n/a | n/a | 3.5 (±1.2) | 3.7 (±1.5) |
|
| ||||
| ACPA positive, % | n/a | n/a | 7 (33%) | 85.7* |
|
| ||||
| Methotrexate | n/a | n/a | 11 (52.4%) | 14 (66.7%) |
| Prednisone | n/a | n/a | 9 (42.9%) | 14 (66.7%) |
| Biological agent | n/a | n/a | 5 (23.8%) | 4 (19.0%) |
|
| ||||
| PD (mm) | 1.9 (1.6–2.2) | 3.0 (3–3.7)* | 2.9 (2–3)# | 3.8 (3.4–4.5)*,# |
| CAL (mm) | 2.2 (2–3) | 3.0 (2.6–3.5) | 3.0 (2.9–3.4) | 4.0 (3.7–5.3)*,# |
| BOP (% sites) | 6 (1.2–16) | 6.7 (2.7–13) | 5 (3.8–7.7) | 7 (5–14) |
| Missing teeth | 2 (0–6) | 4 (1–7) | 6 (2.5–11)# | 6 (3–10) |
| Plaque Index | 0.5 (0.1–1) | 0.5 (0.3–0.8) | 0.5 (0.2–0.7) | 0.58 (0.23–1.1) |
| Tooth brushing (times/day) | 2.85 (±0.93) | 2.62 (±0.85) | 2.82 (±0.5) | 2.69 (±0.6) |
Values were expressed in mean ± SD or median (25% percentile-75% percentile).
CP: Chronic Periodontitis, BOP: bleeding upon probing, PD probing depth, CAL clinical attachment level, DAS28: Disease Activity Score, ACPA anti-citrullinated protein antibody.
*Statistically different comparing Non-CP × CP within the same group.
#Statistically different comparing RA × Healthy Control group with the same periodontal status.
One Way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.05.
Figure 1Bacterial load and microbial diversity in subgingival biofilm samples. (A) Bacterial load. (B–D) Metrics of alpha diversity in control subjects and RA patients with or without periodontitis. *Statistically different compared to non-periodontitis subjects within the same group. #Statistically different compared to matched controls. p < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test.
Figure 2Principal coordinates analysis plots comparing subgingival microbial community compositions. Each point represents a subject. (A) Microbial communities in control and RA subjects without periodontitis. (w/o P). (B) Microbial communities in RA patients versus control subjects with periodontitis (w/P). (C) Microbial communities in RA patients without periodontitis versus with periodontitis.
Figure 3OTUs with different relative abundance based on LEfSe (linear discriminant analysis coupled with effect size measurements) results in control subjects (red) and RA subjects (green). (A) Subjects without periodontitis. (B) Subjects with periodontitis. Bars represent linear discriminant analysis scores (LDA).
Figure 4Levels of inflammatory cytokines in saliva. Control subjects and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with and without periodontitis. Cytokines were measured by cytometric bead array (CBA) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). *Statistically different compared to subjects without periodontitis within the same group. #Statistically different compared to Control. p < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test.
Correlations among inflammatory cytokines in saliva, relative abundance of bacteria, RA and Periodontal parameters in RA patients (rho values).
| IL-33 | IL-2 | TNF-α | IL-6 | IL-17 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| RF | 0.80 | — | — | — | — |
| CRP | 0.60 | — | — | 0.32 | — |
| ESR | — | — | — | 0.50 | — |
|
| |||||
| PD (mm) | — | — | — | — | 0.54 |
| CAL (mm) | — | — | — | — | — |
| BOP (%) | 0.51 | — | — | — | — |
| Missing teeth | — | — | — | 0.35 | — |
|
| |||||
|
| — | — | — | — | −0.30 |
|
| — | — | −0.46 | — | −0.35 |
|
| — | — | −0.45 | — | −0.41 |
|
| −0.35 | — | — | — | — |
|
| 0.32 | — | — | 0.38 | — |
|
| 0.35 | — | — | 0.35 | — |
|
| — | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.47 | 0.30 |
|
| — | — | — | 0.50 | 0.35 |
BOP: bleeding upon probing, PD: probing depth, CAL: clinical attachment level, CRP: C-reactive protein; IL: interleukin; ESR: Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, RF: rheumatoid factor; IL: interleukin; TNF: tumor necrosis factor. All values showed were statistically significant at value of p < 0.05, Spearman rank correlation.