| Literature DB >> 36077251 |
Randy Przybylla1, Christina Susanne Mullins1, Mathias Krohn1, Stefan Oswald2, Michael Linnebacher1.
Abstract
Commonly used intestinal in vitro models are limited in their potential to predict oral drug absorption. They either lack the capability to form a tight cellular monolayer mimicking the intestinal epithelial barrier or the expression of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). The aim of this study was to establish a platform of colorectal cancer patient-derived cell lines for evaluation of human intestinal drug absorption and metabolism. We characterized ten 2D cell lines out of our collection with confluent outgrowth and long-lasting barrier forming potential as well as suitability for high throughput applications with special emphasis on expression and inducibility of CYP3A4. By assessment of the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) the cells barrier function capacity can be quantified. Very high TEER levels were detected for HROC60. A high basal CYP3A4 expression and function was found for HROC32. Eight cell lines showed higher CYP3A4 induction by stimulation via the vitamin D receptor compared to Caco-2 cells (5.1- to 16.8-fold change). Stimulation of the pregnane X receptor led to higher CYP3A4 induction in two cell lines. In sum, we identified the two cell lines HROC183 T0 M2 and HROC217 T1 M2 as useful tools for in vitro drug absorption studies. Due to their high TEER values and inducibility by drug receptor ligands, they may be superior to Caco-2 cells to analyze oral drug absorption and intestinal drug-drug interactions. Significance statement: Selecting appropriate candidates is important in preclinical drug development. Therefore, cell models to predict absorption from the human intestine are of the utmost importance. This study revealed that the human cell lines HROC183 T0 M2 and HROC217 T1 M2 may be better suited models and possess higher predictive power of pregnane X receptor- and vitamin D-mediated drug metabolism than Caco-2 cells. Consequently, they represent useful tools for predicting intestinal absorption and simultaneously enable assessment of membrane permeability and first-pass metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: barrier funtion; drug absorption and metabolism; first-pass metabolism; intestinal epithelial models
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36077251 PMCID: PMC9456142 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179861
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Light microscopy of HROC cell monolayers at 100% confluence. Scale bar = 100 µm, original magnification ×10: (A) HROC32, (B) HROC43, (C) HROC60, (D) HROC80 T1 M1, (E) HROC126, (F) HROC159 T2 M4, (G) HROC183 T0 M2, (H) HROC239 T0 M1, (I) HROC217 T1 M2 (J) HROC383.
Figure 2Measurement of intestinal epithelial barrier integrity by TEER. TEER measurement (in Ω·cm2) over a fixed surface area (0.336 cm2) detected for HROC- and Caco-2 cell layers grown on transwell inserts. (A) Heatmap of time-dependent TEER value alteration in HROC and Caco-2 cells and (B) HROC60 and HROC383 in comparison to Caco-2 cells, grown in Transwell inserts, measured from d1 to d21 post-seeding. Blank value was subtracted from raw data. Data are presented as mean (A) and mean ± SD (B), respectively, of three independent cultures.
Summarized table of results. Cell morphology, barrier forming capacity, and CYP3A4 induction potential in the HROC cell lines of the final panel in comparison to Caco-2.
| Barrier Forming Potency | CYP3A4 Inducibility | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell Line | TEER | FD-4 Permeability | Basal CYP3A4 Activity | PXR-Mediated | VDR-Mediated |
| HROC32 | + | − | +++ | − | ++ |
| HROC43 | + | − | +++ | − | − |
| HROC60 | +++ | − − | − | − | + |
| HROC80 T1 M1 | + | − − | − | ++ | +++ |
| HROC126 | + | − | + | + | +++ |
| HROC159 T2 M4 | + | − | ++ | − | +++ |
| HROC183 T0 M2 | ++ | − | − | ++ | +++ |
| HROC217 T1 M2 | + | − | + | +++ | +++ |
| HROC239 T0 M1 | + | − | + | − | ++ |
| HROC383 | + | − | + | ++ | ++ |
| Caco-2 | + | − | + | ++ | + |
Maximum TEER levels are scored as “+” for 812–1259 Ω·cm2, “++” for 1547–2546 Ω·cm2, “+++” for ≥6000 Ω·cm2. For FD-4 permeability, “−” indicates drop of permeability comparable to Caco-2, “− −” indicates rapid decrease. Basal CYP3A4 activity levels compared to Caco-2 (0.6 to 1.4) are indicated by “+”, “++” indicate 2-fold higher (1.5 to 1.8) and “+++” 2.8- to 6.5-fold higher levels, whereas (−) indicates lower levels (up to 0.2). For CYP3A4 induction, “+” indicate fold changes from 0.7 to 1.3, “++” from 1.4 to 2.0 and “+++” ≥3.8, whereas (−) indicates decreasing levels (up to 0.3) after 72 h induction.
Figure 3Measurement of intestinal epithelial barrier integrity by FD4 flux assay. Quantification of FITC-labeled dextran passing from apical to basolateral of HROC- and Caco-2 cell layers grown on transwell inserts. (A) Heatmap of time-dependent FD-4 permeability and (B) selected HROC cell lines in comparison to Caco-2 cells, measured on d3, d5, d7, d9, d14, and d21 post-seeding. The % FD-4 permeability was calculated as the amount of FD-4 in the basolateral compartment after 20 min incubation time divided by the total amount of FD-4 collected in empty cell free control multiplied by 100. Data represent mean of three independent cultures (A) and mean ± SD (B).
Figure 4Scratch wound-healing assay of HROC cell lines. Representative images of selected HROC cell lines at d0 and d4 post-injury. Confluent cell monolayers were grown in 6-well plates maintained in media without FCS. Scratch was administered on d0, distances between the edges of the gap were recorded 96 h after wounding. Speed of wound closing (µm/h) was calculated by subtracting the initial distance from the distance of the last time point divided by the number of hours. Scale bar = 200 µm, original magnification × 4. Data represent mean ± SD.
Figure 5Basal CYP3A4 activity level and CYP3A4 induction potential in HROC and Caco-2 cells. Cells were treated with (A) 0.1% DMSO as vehicle control, (B,C) 100 nM VD3, and (D,E) 20 µM RIF. Fold-induction (B,D) was calculated from DMSO-treated cells, untreated control group was set at 1.0. For RLUs (C,E), blank value was subtracted from all values. Data are represented as the mean ± SD of three independent measurements. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Summarized table of potential applications for the intestinal model candidate HROC cell lines. Highlighted features and potential applications for the ten HROC cell lines of the final panel.
| Cell Line | Feature | Application |
|---|---|---|
| HROC32 | Very high basal CYP3A4 activity, VDR-mediated CYP3A4 inducibility | Drug absorption, development of alternative drug regimens, best model for evaluation of metabolic effects, VDR-mediated first-pass metabolism |
| HROC43 | High basal CYP3A4 activity | Drug absorption, development of alternative drug regimens |
| HROC60 | Extremely high barrier integrity, rapid barrier development, long-lasting monolayer | Drug absorption, best model for long-term experiments like ‘gut-on-a-chip’ |
| HROC80 T1 M1 | Rapid barrier development, VDR-mediated CYP3A4 inducibility | Drug absorption, VDR-mediated first-pass metabolism |
| HROC126 | Rectal cancer cell line, VDR-mediated CYP3A4 inducibility | Drug absorption, Best model for rectal drug administration, VDR-mediated first-pass metabolism |
| HROC159 T2 M4 | VDR-mediated CYP3A4 inducibility | Drug absorption, VDR-mediated first-pass metabolism |
| HROC183 T0 M2 | High barrier integrity, high VDR-mediated CYP3A4 inducibility | Drug absorption, together with HROC217 T1 M2 best model for PXR-/VDR-mediated first-pass metabolism |
| HROC217 T1 M2 | High VDR-mediated CYP3A4 inducibility | Drug absorption, together with HROC183 T0 M2 best model for PXR-/VDR-mediated first-pass metabolism |
| HROC239 T0 M1 | Rectal cancer cell line, VDR-mediated CYP3A4 inducibility | Drug absorption, rectal drug administration, VDR-mediated first-pass metabolism |
| HROC383 | PXR-mediated CYP3A4 inducibility | Drug absorption, PXR-mediated first pass metabolism |