| Literature DB >> 30487698 |
Michael Gock1, Christina S Mullins2, Carina Bergner3, Friedrich Prall4, Robert Ramer5, Anja Göder6, Oliver H Krämer6, Falko Lange7, Bernd J Krause3, Ernst Klar1, Michael Linnebacher8.
Abstract
AIM: To establish patient-individual tumor models of rectal cancer for analyses of novel biomarkers, individual response prediction and individual therapy regimens.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; 18F-fluorothymidine; FOLFIRI; FOLFOX; Patient-derived tumor model; Personalized medicine; Rectal cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30487698 PMCID: PMC6250916 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i43.4880
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742
Cell line establishment protocol
| HROC126 | + | - | + | + |
| HROC239 T0 M1 | - | + | + | + |
| HROC284Met | + | - | + | + |
+: Positive; -: Negative; B-LCL: B-lymphoid cell line.
Figure 1Migratory potential and invasiveness of individual rectal cancer cell lines. Invasion and migration of HROC126, HROC239 T0 M1 and HROC284Met were analyzed in comparison to reference cell line HCT116. Cells were subjected to migration assay (migration, grey bars) and matrigel invasion assay (invasion, black bars). Values are mean ± SEM of n = 3; t-test bP < 0.01 vs HCT116.
Figure 2Morphology and phenotype of individual rectal cancer cell lines. A: Light microscopy of freshly established tumor cell lines (all passage 6-11). Cell lines were established from patients’ tumor material as described in material and methods. Original magnification × 100; B: Phenotyping was conducted by flow cytometry (BD FACSARIA II) using fluorochrome-labeled mAbs as given on the x-axis. Exemplary data of one analysis out of three biological replicates are given. Some markers display a high variation in dependence from cell density in the culture vessels. HLA: Human leukocyte antigen.
Molecular characterization and mutational profile of rectal cancer cell lines
| HROC126 | 0 | Mss | Aneuploid | Wt | Wt | Wt | Wt | Wt | Wt |
| HROC239 T0 M1 | 0 | Mss | Aneuploid | Mut | Mut | Mut | Wt | Wt | Mut |
| HROC284Met | 0 | Mss | Aneuploid | Mut | Wt | Mut | Wt | Wt | Mut |
Wt: Wildtype; Mut: Mutated; CIMP: CpG island methylator phenotype; MSI: Microsatellite instability; Mss: Microsatellite stable.
Figure 3Expression of p53 and some of its targets in individual rectal cancer cell lines. Western blot analysis of untreated HROC126, HROC239 T0 M1 and HROC284Met cells compared to HCT116 (p53 wildtype) and HCT116 p53-/- was performed. The levels of HDAC1, HDAC2, p53, BAX and survivin were assessed using specific antibodies. HSP90 was used as loading control.
Half maximal inhibitory concentration values of antitumor drugs
| HROC126 | 0.42 | 0.72 | 0.3 |
| HROC239 T0 M1 | 21 | 4.4 | 2.4 |
| HROC284Met | 7 | 4.3 | 0.68 |
| Plasma levels (pharmacokinetic) | 50 | 10 | 2 |
Values are given as mean, resulting from at least three independent experiments each performed in triplicates. 5-FU: 5-Fluorouracil.
Figure 4Analysis of chemo- and radiosensitivity. A: Sensitivity of individual rectal cancer cell lines to FOLFOX and FOLFIRI chemotherapy; B: Sensitivity of cell lines to combination of irradion with 50 Gy and chemotherapy with FOLFIRI or FOLFOX; C: Radiosensitivity of rectal cancer cells. Cells were irradiated to different doses using a 137Cs-source. Cell viability of all experiments was measured using crystal violet assay. Values represent the mean absorbance at 570 nm ± SEM of n = 3 analyses; t-test aP < 0.05 vs control, bP < 0.01 vs control, cP < 0.0001 vs control.
Figure 518F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fluorothymidine uptake. Subconfluent-growing rectal cancer cells were either radiated (50 Gy), treated with FOLFOX (IC25) or challenged with combinations thereof. Rectal cancer cells were incubated with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose or 18F-fluorothymidine, and uptake was quantified as described in the “materials and methods” section. Counts per minute were normalized to total protein content of the samples. One hundred percent 18F uptake corresponds to solvent-treated cancer cells (n = 10); aP < 0.05 vs control cultures (Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn’s test). 18F-FDG: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; 18F-FLT: 18F-fluorothymidine.