Literature DB >> 10664539

Caco-2 versus Caco-2/HT29-MTX co-cultured cell lines: permeabilities via diffusion, inside- and outside-directed carrier-mediated transport.

C Hilgendorf1, H Spahn-Langguth, C G Regårdh, E Lipka, G L Amidon, P Langguth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was a systematic characterization and evaluation of cell culture models based on mixtures of Caco-2/HT29-MTX co-cultures for their use in screening for drug absorption and intestinal permeability in comparison to the properties of the respective mono-cultures.
METHODS: Co-cultures of Caco-2 cells (absorptive-type) and HT29-MTX cells (goblet-type) were set up. Three different co-cultures (initial seeding ratios Caco-2/HT29-MTX: 90/10, 70/30, and 50/50) were grown on permeable filter supports, and monolayers were used for permeability studies with model compounds for paracellular absorption (atenolol, furosemide, H334/75, mannitol, terbutaline), transcellular absorption (antipyrine, ketoprofen, metoprolol, piroxicam), carrier-mediated absorption (D-glucose, Gly-Pro, and L-phenylalanine) as well as substrates for carrier-mediated secretion via P-glycoprotein (cimetidine and talinolol). Electrophysiological and microscopic controls were performed to characterize the cell cultures.
RESULTS: For compounds undergoing passive intestinal absorption permeabilities were generally higher in co-cultures than in Caco-2 monolayers, yielding highest values in pure HT29-MTX monolayers. This difference was most obvious for compounds transported via the paracellular pathway, where HT29-MTX cells may be up to 30 times more permeable than Caco-2 cells, whereas for lipophilic and highly permeable compounds, the difference in permeability values was less obvious. For drugs undergoing intestinal secretion mediated by P-glycoprotein, co-cultivation of Caco-2 cells with HT29-MTX cells led to increased apical to basolateral permeability which was decreased in the opposite direction, consistent with the fact that HT29-MTX cells do not express P-glycoprotein. When a carrier-mediated absorption mechanism is involved, the permeabilities observed were lower than the values reported for human small intestine and co-cultivation of HT29-MTX cells with Caco-2 cells resulted in even lower values as compared to the plain Caco-2 cultures.
CONCLUSIONS: Co-cultures of HT29-MTX and Caco-2 cells offer the opportunity of modifying the permeability barrier of the cell monolayers both with respect to paracellular resistance and secretory transport via P-gp. Thus, in special cases, they allow more flexibility in adapting the in vitro system to the in vivo situation as compared to the monocultures. Another advantage is the obvious robustness of the method with respect to the reproducibility of the results. A problem remaining, however, is the quantitative expression of carriers involved in intestinal uptake of many nutrients and drugs. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmaceutical Association J Pharm Sci 89: 63-75, 2000

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10664539     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6017(200001)89:1<63::AID-JPS7>3.0.CO;2-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  87 in total

1.  Comparison of human duodenum and Caco-2 gene expression profiles for 12,000 gene sequences tags and correlation with permeability of 26 drugs.

Authors:  Duxin Sun; Hans Lennernas; Lynda S Welage; Jeffery L Barnett; Christopher P Landowski; David Foster; David Fleisher; Kyung-Dall Lee; Gordon L Amidon
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  A technique to estimate in vivo dissolution profiles without data from a solution.

Authors:  Jack A Cook
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Assessment of poly(methacrylic acid-co-N-vinyl pyrrolidone) as a carrier for the oral delivery of therapeutic proteins using Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cell lines.

Authors:  Daniel A Carr; Nicholas A Peppas
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Evaluation of nanosuspensions for absorption enhancement of poorly soluble drugs: in vitro transport studies across intestinal epithelial monolayers.

Authors:  T Lenhardt; G Vergnault; P Grenier; D Scherer; P Langguth
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 5.  Balancing protection and release of DNA: tools to address a bottleneck of non-viral gene delivery.

Authors:  Christopher L Grigsby; Kam W Leong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Drug discovery and regulatory considerations for improving in silico and in vitro predictions that use Caco-2 as a surrogate for human intestinal permeability measurements.

Authors:  Caroline A Larregieu; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Improvement of paracellular transport in the Caco-2 drug screening model using protein-engineered substrates.

Authors:  Rebecca L DiMarco; Daniel R Hunt; Ruby E Dewi; Sarah C Heilshorn
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  TEER measurement techniques for in vitro barrier model systems.

Authors:  Balaji Srinivasan; Aditya Reddy Kolli; Mandy Brigitte Esch; Hasan Erbil Abaci; Michael L Shuler; James J Hickman
Journal:  J Lab Autom       Date:  2015-01-13

9.  Investigation of Twenty Metal, Metal Oxide, and Metal Sulfide Nanoparticles' Impact on Differentiated Caco-2 Monolayer Integrity.

Authors:  Ninell P Mortensen; Maria Moreno Caffaro; Purvi R Patel; Md Jamal Uddin; Shyam Aravamudhan; Susan J Sumner; Timothy R Fennell
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2020-02-13

10.  Evaluation of an immortalized retinal endothelial cell line as an in vitro model for drug transport studies across the blood-retinal barrier.

Authors:  Jie Shen; Stacy T Cross; Diane D S Tang-Liu; Devin F Welty
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.