| Literature DB >> 36076898 |
Huaxiang Li1, Dan Ji1, Zhishan Luo2, Yilin Ren3, Zhenming Lu2, Zhenquan Yang1,4, Zhenghong Xu2.
Abstract
Antrodia cinnamomea is a precious edible and medicinal mushroom with various biological activities, such as hepatoprotection, antitumor, antivirus, immunoregulation, and intestinal flora regulation. However, the wild fruiting bodies of A. cinnamomea are scarce and expensive. Submerged fermentation based on spore inoculation has become the most efficient and popular artificial culture method for A. cinnamomea. In order to complement the mechanism of asexual sporulation of A. cinnamomea in submerged fermentation, and provide a theoretical basis to further improve the sporulation, comparative transcriptomics analysis using RNA-seq and RT-qPCR were conducted on A. cinnamomea mycelia cultured under different nutritional conditions to reveal the regulatory mechanism underlying the asexual sporulation induced by nutrient limitation. The obtained mechanism is as follows: under nitrogen starvation, the corresponding sensors transmit signals to genes, such as areA and tmpA, and promote their expression. Among these genes, AreA has a direct or indirect effect on flbD and promotes its expression, further enhancing the expression of brlA. Meanwhile, TmpA has a direct or indirect effect on brlA and promotes its expression; under carbon starvation, transport protein Rco-3, as a glucose sensor, directly or indirectly transmits signals to brlA and promotes its expression. BrlA promotes the expression of abaA gene, which further enhances the expression of wetA gene, and wetA then directly leads to asexual sporulation and promotes spore maturation; meanwhile, gulC can also promote cell autolysis, which provides energy and raw materials for sporulation.Entities:
Keywords: Antrodia cinnamomea; asexual sporulation; nutrient limitation; regulatory mechanism; submerged fermentation; transcriptomic
Year: 2022 PMID: 36076898 PMCID: PMC9455894 DOI: 10.3390/foods11172715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Primers used for RT-qPCR.
| Gene Name | Upstream Primer (5′→3′) | Downstream Primer (5′→3′) | Product (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| GCCGCCGACTCCCTCTG | AATGAACAAGCAAGCACTGACG | 140 |
|
| GGCAGAAATTCCAAGAGCATAGTC | CACCTCAGGCACAACCATCC | 178 |
|
| GTAGAGTGAGGCAAGGCAGATG | TGTCCAATTCAGTCCGCATACC | 139 |
|
| GGCGAGGAGGTATAATATGAGTGG | GGTGACGAAGGAGCGAAAGC | 152 |
|
| TCGCTGTATTTCTGTCGCTCAC | GCACCAACACCGCTCTACC | 132 |
|
| CAGGCGAGATGGTAAGGATACG | AGCGGGAAATGATGGTGAGC | 141 |
|
| GAGGAGGATTGGATGCGGATG | AACGAGGTCTCTAACAGTGATGC | 161 |
|
| AGAAAGGGTGGTCAAGGTTATGC | CAGAAGAGGAGGTGCGAGATTAC | 175 |
|
| TCTCTTCGCTTGGTTCACATCC | CGCTTGTATATGGCTCCTGGTC | 180 |
|
| ATATGGTATGTGGAGTGGTTGGC | GGCGGTGGCGATGATTGG | 175 |
|
| GTGTTGGAAATGTTGACGAGGAC | GCGGAGTGGAAGATGACAAGG | 178 |
| 18S rRNA | GCTGGTCGCTGGCTTCTTAG | CGCTGGCTCTGTCAGTGTAG | 123 |
Composition analysis of the fermentation broth of A. cinnamomea.
| Component | Content (g/L) | |
|---|---|---|
| 0 Day | 5 Days | |
| glucose | 20.1 ± 0.2 | 15.1 ± 1.4 |
| nitrogen | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.0 |
| SO42− | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 0.3 ± 0.0 |
| PO43− | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
| pH | 4.5 ± 0.0 | 3.9 ± 0.1 |
Note: the medium contained 20.0 g/L glucose, 10.0 g/L yeast extract powder, 3.0 g/L KH2PO4, and 1.5 g/L MgSO4 with initial pH of 4.5, then cultured at 26 °C and 150 r/min for 10 days with spore inoculum of 1.0 × 106 spores/mL; “0 day”: the fresh medium that did not begin to culture; “5 days”: the fermentation broth cultured for 5 days.
Effect of different nitrogen and carbon contents on the conidiation of A. cinnamomea.
| Content | Biomass | Sporulation | Sporulation Capability | Residual Sugar |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrogen (yeast extract powder) contents (g/L) | ||||
| 0 | 3.6 ± 0.3 b | 230.0 ± 20.3 f | 63.5 ± 2.7 f | 4.9 ± 0.1 a |
| 0.5 | 4.0 ± 0.3 bc | 63.5 ± 4.5 e | 15.8 ± 1.0 e | 4.7 ± 0.1 a |
| 1.0 | 4.0 ± 0.3 bc | 35.5 ± 3.3 d | 8.9 ± 0.6 d | 4.7 ± 0.1 a |
| 5.0 | 4.6 ± 0.3 cd | 8.3 ± 0.3 c | 1.8 ± 0.1 c | 4.6 ± 0.1 a |
| 10 | 4.9 ± 0.4 d | 4.0 ± 0.5 b | 0.8 ± 0.0 b | 4.6 ± 0.2 a |
| Control | ||||
| CK1 | 4.8 ± 0.4 d | 2.8 ± 0.3 b | 0.6 ± 0.0 b | 4.5 ± 0.2 a |
| CK2 | 4.7 ± 0.4 d | 2.3 ± 0.3 b | 0.5 ± 0.0 b | 4.5 ± 0.1 a |
| 5 days | 1.5 ± 0.1 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 13.5 ± 1.2 b |
| Carbon (glucose) contents (g/L) | ||||
| 0 | 1.3 ± 0.1 a | 165.0 ± 12.5 d | 132.0 ± 8.7 e | 0.1 ± 0.0 a |
| 2.0 | 1.9 ± 0.2 b | 262.5 ± 25.2 e | 135.3 ± 9.1 e | 0.1 ± 0.0 a |
| 5.0 | 2.8 ± 0.3 c | 487.5 ± 30.5 f | 176.6 ± 9.7 f | 0.1 ± 0.0 a |
| 10 | 3.0 ± 0.1 c | 256.3 ± 13.7 e | 84.6 ± 4.2 d | 0.2 ± 0.0 a |
| 20 | 3.9 ± 0.3 d | 114.3 ± 8.0 c | 29.1 ± 2.0 c | 8.9 ± 0.8 c |
| Control | ||||
| CK1 | 4.4 ± 0.2 e | 4.3 ± 0.3 b | 0.9 ± 0.0 b | 4.6 ± 0.1 b |
| CK2 | 4.3 ± 0.3 e | 4.5 ± 0.2 b | 1.0 ± 0.0 b | 4.5 ± 0.2 b |
| 5 days | 1.8 ± 0.1 b | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 0.0 ± 0.0 a | 15.1 ± 1.4 d |
Note: For all the groups, A. cinnamomea was first cultured in fermentation medium for 5 days. The broth was allowed to stand for 5 min, and the supernatant was then removed with a pipette under sterile conditions. The obtained mycelium pellets were washed with normal saline three times and then treated as follows. (1) For nitrogen: added with 100 mL of medium containing 0, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, or 10.0 g/L yeast extract powder, 15.0 g/L glucose, 1.44 g/L KH2PO4, and 0.38 g/L MgSO4 with initial pH of 3.9, and continued to culture for 4 days. (2) For carbon: added with 100 mL of medium containing 0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0, or 20.0 g/L glucose, 0 g/L yeast extract powder, 1.44 g/L KH2PO4, and 0.38 g/L MgSO4 with initial pH of 3.9, and continued to culture for 4 days. (3) For control: “CK1”: A. cinnamomea was cultured in fermentation medium for 9 days without any treatment; “CK2”: mycelium pellets were washed with normal saline three times, then transferred back the supernatant, and continuously cultured for another 4 days; “5 days”: the fermentation broth of A. cinnamomea cultured for 5 days in fermentation medium; (4) “Sporulation capability” means the sporulation produced by per gram of mycelium, and was calculated by dividing the sporulation by the biomass; (5) Different letters in the same column of the table indicate that the difference is significant at the level of 0.05.
Figure 1Statistical analysis of sample repeatability and differentially expressed genes. (A): PCA analysis; (B): correlation analysis.
Figure 2GO classification enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes.
Figure 3iPath analysis of the differentially expressed genes.
Differential expression genes with possible involvement in the condition of A. cinnamomea.
| Unigene ID | Genome ID | Gene Name | Accession Number | E Value | Homology (%) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c6157_g2 | ACg005466 |
| OAS999571 | 3.40 × 10−10 | 47.458 | 8 |
| c9703_g1 | ACg001829 |
| EEQ33126.1 | 7.23 × 10−25 | 43.802 | 31 |
| c5765_g1 | ACg000119 |
| AAM95989.1 | 5.33 × 10−11 | 53.846 | 12 |
| c6072_g2 | ACg005882 |
| XP_0095505191 | 5.54 × 10−59 | 39.61 | 88 |
| c2971_g1 | ACg005363 |
| EFL410741 | 6.84 × 10−29 | 29.032 | 65 |
| c6203_g1 | ACg005139 |
| OBZ74137.1 | 5.25 × 10−106 | 36.154 | 94 |
| c5652_g1 | ACg002449 |
| AAP13095.2 | 3.48 × 10−99 | 38.318 | 88 |
| c6469_g1 | ACg003505 |
| CCO35477.1 | 6.08 × 10−32 | 37.908 | 25 |
| c7055_g1 | ACg003525 |
| KYQ43884.1 | 2.56 × 10−180 | 71.023 | 97 |
| c4436_g1 | ACg008078 |
| ABS82797.1 | 6.74 × 10−28 | 26.879 | 70 |
| c6333_g2 | ACg007557 |
| EHK46811.1 | 7.11 × 10−142 | 47.992 | 32 |
| c5534_g2 | ACg005514 |
| AHI42991.1 | 6.44 × 10−149 | 62.776 | 99 |
| c6649_g1 | ACg000307 |
| CEL57564.1 | 5.21 × 10−157 | 82.609 | 99 |
| c5803_g1 | ACg008021 |
| AAT34979.1 | 4.24 × 10−14 | 51.563 | 14 |
| c4252_g1 | ACg006463 |
| CDM33077.1 | 2.03 × 10−14 | 21.918 | 26 |
| c6977_g1 | - |
| AIF79427.1 | 5.06 × 10−10 | 22.68 | 44 |
Note: “Unigene ID” is the code of unigene generated in the process of software assembly; “Genome ID” is the code corresponded by the gene matched with Unigene in A. cinnamomea genome; “-“ means the gene unmatched in A. cinnamomea genome database; “Accession number” is the number in NCBI of the protein matched with Unigene in local protein database; “E value”, “Homology”, and “Coverage” are used to describe the matching between Unigene and the corresponding protein in the local protein database. If E value is lower, Homology and Coverage are higher, the matching degree is higher. If E value ≤ 10−6, it means that the matching is successful.
Figure 4Different nutritional conditions effect on the genes involving in condition of A. cinnamomea. (A): changes in the expression of genes related to asexual sporulation signal pathway mediated by A. cinnamomea FluG; (B): changes in the expression of other genes related to asexual sporulation of A. cinnamomea matched with the local protein database; A. cinnamomea 18S rRNA gene was taken as the internal reference, and mycelium of control group was taken as CK.
Figure 5Proposed nutrient limitation induced signaling pathway of conidiation for A. cinnamomea.