| Literature DB >> 36076212 |
Hanpeng Xu1, Jincheng Wu1, Hongru Xie1, Wangqiang Wen2, Haoxiang Xu3, Juan Du4, Jun Miao5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate and evaluate the biomechanical behaviour of tension-band-reconstruction (TBR) and ordinary titanium plates in open-door laminoplasty by finite element (FE) analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Cervical spine; Finite element analysis; Open-door laminoplasty; Titanium plate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36076212 PMCID: PMC9454233 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05804-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.562
Fig. 1Front and side views of two titanium plates (lower, tension band titanium plate)
Fig. 2A Healthy adult cervical spine (C2-T1) FE model. B Intervertebral disc
Material properties defined in the C2-T1 FE model
| Component | Young’s modulus (MPa) | Poisson’s ratio | Cross-sectional area (mm2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bony structures | |||
| Cortical bone | 12,000 | 0.3 | – |
| Cancellous bone | 100 | 0.2 | – |
| Endplate | 500 | 0.4 | – |
| Posterior structure | 3500 | 0.25 | – |
| Facet cartilage | 10 | 0.4 | – |
| Muscles | 10 | 0.38 | 10 |
| Intervertebral disc | |||
| Annulus fibre | 450 | 0.45 | 0.15 |
| Annulus ground | Hyperelastic Mooney-Rivlin C10 = 0.56 C01 = 0.14 | ||
| Nucleus pulposus | Hyperelastic Mooney-Rivlin C10 = 0.12 C01 = 0.09 | ||
| Ligaments | |||
| ALL | 15 | – | 11.1 |
| PLL | 10 | – | 11.3 |
| LF | 5 | – | 46 |
| ISL | 4 | – | 12 |
| CL | 7 | – | 42.2 |
| Implants | |||
| Titanium plate/screw | 110,000 | 0.3 | – |
Fig. 3A FE model of open-door laminoplasty in three models. B Top view of C3 after open-door laminoplasty. C Intraoperative view of TBR titanium plate
Fig. 4Comparison of level-by-level ROM for intact FE model between in-house experimental and reported data in flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation at 2 N·m
Fig. 5ROM of C2-T1 (°) in the three models in flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation
Fig. 6Von-Mises stress (MPa) distribution in titanium plates at C3 in flexion and extension in the three models
Fig. 7Von-Mises stress (MPa) distribution and the value of maximum stress in titanium plates at C4, C5 and C6 in three models in flexion
Fig. 8Intradiscal pressure (MPa) in the three models in flexion