Literature DB >> 26799115

Biomechanics of open-door laminoplasty with and without preservation of posterior structures.

Andrew T Healy1, Daniel Lubelski2,3, James L West4, Prasath Mageswaran5, Robb Colbrunn5, Thomas E Mroz1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Cervical open-door laminoplasty (ODL) is designed to decompress the spinal cord, maintain motion, and prevent postlaminectomy kyphosis. Many traditional laminoplasty techniques involve disruption of the posterior ligamentous structures, most notably the C7-T1 supraspinous ligament and interspinales muscle complex (intraspinous and supraspinous ligaments [ISLs]). METHODS Eight human cervical cadaveric specimens (C2-T1) were used to investigate the subaxial kinematics following ODL with varying degrees of posterior element disruption. Ligamentous integrity was preserved and specimens were tested utilizing force control in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) in the native state, and following 1) C3-7 ODL, 2) ODL with terminal ISL resection, 3) ODL with C3-7 spinous process resection, and 4) C3-7 laminectomy. Range of motion (ROM) was measured across C2-T1, "global," and at the segmental level. RESULTS Compared with ODL, sectioning the terminal ISLs resulted in global ROM increases by 7.9% in FE, 2.4% in LB, and 5.6% in AR (p > 0.05), whereas laminectomy increased global ROM by 36.0% in FE (p = 0.002) and a 26.3% increase in AR ROM (p = 0.01). When considering segmental ROM, resection of the terminal ISLs increased ROM in FE by 36.5% at C2-3 (p = 0.019) and 25.4% at C7-T1 (p > 0.05). Segmental increases following C3-7 spinous process resection averaged less than 3% per level, compared with up to 40% increases in ROM per level after laminectomy. CONCLUSIONS Laminectomy resulted in the greatest increase in global cervical ROM. Resection of the ISLs at C2-3 and C7-T1 increased segmental ROM at these specific levels to a similar extent that laminectomy increased ROM at each cervical level. This segmental ROM may contribute to pain or postprocedural deformity and highlights the importance of the ISLs at the terminal ends of the ODL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AR = axial rotation; FE = flexion-extension; ISL = interspinous and supraspinous ligament; LB = lateral bending; ODL = open-door laminoplasty; ROM = range of motion; biomechanics; cervical spine; interspinales muscle complex; laminectomy; open-door laminoplasty; technique

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26799115     DOI: 10.3171/2015.7.SPINE15229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  5 in total

1.  A novel posterior approach preserving three muscles inserted at C2 in multilevel cervical posterior decompression and fusion using C2 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Takuya Numasawa; Taito Itabashi; Yoshihito Yamasaki; Hitoshi Kudo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Relationship between cervical curvature and spinal cord drift distance after laminectomy via lateral mass screw fixation and its effect on clinical efficacy.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Xiao-Zhe Zhou; Ning Li; Tong-Guang Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of 4-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Xian-Zheng Wang; Huanan Liu; Jia-Qi Li; Yapeng Sun; Fei Zhang; Lei Guo; Peng Zhang; Chen-Hao Dou; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 2.071

4.  Biomechanical behaviour of tension-band-reconstruction titanium plate in open-door laminoplasty: a study based on finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hanpeng Xu; Jincheng Wu; Hongru Xie; Wangqiang Wen; Haoxiang Xu; Juan Du; Jun Miao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.562

5.  Aggravation and subsequent disappearance of cervical disc herniation after cervical open-door laminoplasty: A case report.

Authors:  Yang Meng; Xiaofei Wang; Beiyu Wang; Tingkui Wu; Hao Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.