Literature DB >> 36076120

The role of discriminability in face perception: Interference processing of expression, gender, and gaze.

Enguang Chen1, Bingbing Xia1, Yujing Lian1, Qi Zhang1, Xuexian Yang1, Hailing Wang2.   

Abstract

Eye gaze plays a fundamental role in social interaction and facial recognition. However, interference processing between gaze and other facial variants (e.g., expression) and invariant information (e.g., gender) remains controversial and unclear, especially the role of facial information discriminability in interference. A Garner paradigm was used to conduct two experiments. This paradigm allows simultaneous investigation of the mutual influence of two kinds of facial information in one experiment. In Experiment 1, we manipulated facial expression discriminability and investigated its role in interference processing of gaze and facial expression. The results show that individuals were unable to ignore expression when classifying gaze with both high and low discriminability but could ignore gaze when classifying expression with high discriminability only. In Experiment 2, we manipulated gender discriminability and investigated its function in interference processing of gaze and gender. Participants were unable to ignore gender when classifying gaze with both high and low discriminability but could ignore gaze when classifying gender with low discriminability only. The results indicate that gaze categorization is affected by facial expression and gender regardless of facial information discriminability, whereas interference of gaze on facial expression and gender depends on the degree of discriminability. The present study provides evidence that the processing of gaze and other variant and invariant information is interdependent.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Expression; Eye gaze; Facial discriminability; Garner paradigm; Gender

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36076120     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02561-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.157


  39 in total

1.  Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Robert E Kleck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-11

2.  Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facially communicated emotion.

Authors:  Reginald B Adams; Robert E Kleck
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2005-03

3.  The world of emotions is not two-dimensional.

Authors:  Johnny R J Fontaine; Klaus R Scherer; Etienne B Roesch; Phoebe C Ellsworth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-12

4.  Extracting variant and invariant information from faces: the neural substrates of gaze detection and sex categorization.

Authors:  Jasmin Cloutier; David J Turk; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.083

5.  Uncovering gender discrimination cues in a realistic setting.

Authors:  Nicolas Dupuis-Roy; Isabelle Fortin; Daniel Fiset; Frédéric Gosselin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  What's the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement.

Authors:  A M Burton; V Bruce; N Dench
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Is it in the eyes? Dissociating the role of emotion and perceptual features of emotionally expressive faces in modulating orienting to eye gaze.

Authors:  Sarah J Bayless; Missy Glover; Margot J Taylor; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-03-21

8.  Age and Gender Differences in Emotion Recognition.

Authors:  Laura Abbruzzese; Nadia Magnani; Ian H Robertson; Mauro Mancuso
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-23

9.  How do we update faces? Effects of gaze direction and facial expressions on working memory updating.

Authors:  Caterina Artuso; Paola Palladino; Paola Ricciardelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-09-27

10.  MEG evidence for dynamic amygdala modulations by gaze and facial emotions.

Authors:  Thibaud Dumas; Stéphanie Dubal; Yohan Attal; Marie Chupin; Roland Jouvent; Shasha Morel; Nathalie George
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.