Literature DB >> 36071928

An In vitro study of biomechanical comparison between titanium 4-hole 3D plates and titanium conventional 4-hole miniplates for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures.

Mathew Tharakan1, Surej Kumar L K1, Meghna Chandrachood1.   

Abstract

Background: Fracture fixation, in the present times, is classically done using mini plates. The position and number of plates to fixate a mandibular angle fracture have been and are still extensively researched and reported in the literature. A more recent addition is 3D mini plates. Aim: To compare and evaluate the biomechanical behavior of one 2.0 mm titanium 3D miniplate fixation plate (4- hole) and one 2.0 mm titanium 4-hole miniplate in internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Objective: To measure load at break, maximum load, and displacement at maximal load for internal fixation done with 3D mini plates and conventional mini plates respectively.
Methods: Five dry cadaveric mandibles were sectioned into 10 hemi-mandibles. Each cadaveric mandible was sectioned at the angle of mandible to simulate unfavorable mandibular angle fracture. The obtained hemimandible were divided into experimental groups (GROUP 1 and GROUP 2) with 5 samples in each group, plated with a linear miniplate and 3D miniplate respectively. Maximal load, Load at break, and displacement at maximum load were the only obtained parameters for comparison.
Results: Conventional miniplate showed greater mean maximum load values of 174.93 N±54.45 compared to 3D mini plates which recorded a mean maximum load value of 106.96 N ± 23.86. Load at break and displacement at maximum load were found to be both insignificant.
Conclusion: The results in this study showed statistically no significant difference with any of the above parameters except maximal load, between the two groups evaluated. Conventional linear miniplate according to Champy's lines of osteosynthesis can be used successfully for providing satisfactory osteosynthesis with the definitive advantage of cost-effectiveness.
© 2022 Craniofacial Research Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D miniplate; Cadaveric mandible; Champy's lines; Fracture; In-vitro; Mandibular angle; Miniplate

Year:  2022        PMID: 36071928      PMCID: PMC9441330          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  13 in total

1.  [Tretment of mandibular fractures by means of osteosynthesis without intermaxillary immobilization according to F.X. Michelet's technic].

Authors:  M Champy; A Wilk; J M Schnebelen
Journal:  Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl       Date:  1975

2.  [The value of 3-dimensional plates in maxillofacial surgery].

Authors:  M Farmand; L Dupoirieux
Journal:  Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac       Date:  1992

Review 3.  Three-dimensional versus standard miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular angle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  E À Al-Moraissi; T M El-Sharkawy; T I El-Ghareeb; B R Chrcanovic
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Osteosynthesis with miniaturized screwed plates in maxillo-facial surgery.

Authors:  F X Michelet; J Deymes; B Dessus
Journal:  J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1973-06

5.  A prospective study of 3 treatment methods for isolated fractures of the mandibular angle.

Authors:  Edward Ellis
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Evaluation of Three Different Osteosynthesis Methods for Mandibular Angle Fractures: Vertical Load Test.

Authors:  Valfrido Antonio Pereira-Filho; Luis Fernando de Gorla Oliveira; José Maurício Dos Santos Nunes Reis; Marisa Aparecida Cabrini Gabrielli; Rubens Spin Neto; Marcelo Silva Monnazzi
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Comparison of 3-dimensional and standard miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Jain; K S Manjunath; B K Bhagwan; Dipit K Shah
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Treatment of mandibular angle fractures with a matrix miniplate: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Jules Feledy; Edward J Caterson; Shon Steger; Samuel Stal; Larry Hollier
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model.

Authors:  V Shetty; D McBrearty; M Fourney; A A Caputo
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 10.  The biophysics of mandibular fractures: an evolution toward understanding.

Authors:  Randal H Rudderman; Robert L Mullen; John H Phillips
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.