| Literature DB >> 36067205 |
Julia Anttonen1, Tiina Remes1,2, Pekka Arikoski3, Päivi Lähteenmäki4, Mikko Arola5, Arja Harila-Saari6, Tuula Lönnqvist2, Tytti Pokka1, Pekka Riikonen3, Kirsti Sirkiä2, Heikki Rantala1, Marja Ojaniemi1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Growth failure is common in radiotherapy-treated long-term survivors of pediatric brain tumors, but studies on longitudinal growth in this patient group are lacking. Here, the aim was to assess the changes in growth patterns before and after brain tumor diagnosis, the adult height, and the risk factors for compromised growth. The incidence and treatment practices of growth hormone deficiency were analyzed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36067205 PMCID: PMC9447887 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274274
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1Flowchart of the cohort population.
Clinical and demographic data on the 73 childhood brain tumor survivors.
| (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender |
| 46 | 62 |
|
| 27 | 37 | |
| Age at diagnosis, years | 0–6 | 34 | 47 |
| 7–11 | 22 | 30 | |
| 12–16 | 17 | 23 | |
| Location of tumor |
| 12 | 16 |
|
| 20 | 27 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | |
|
| 26 | 36 | |
|
| 4 | 6 | |
|
| 10 | 14 | |
| Operation |
| 29 | 39 |
|
| 31 | 43 | |
|
| 10 | 14 | |
|
| 3 | 4 | |
| Radiotherapy |
| 38 | 52 |
|
| 3 | 4 | |
|
| 30 | 41 | |
|
| 2 | 3 | |
| Chemotherapy |
| 47 | 64 |
| Treatment combination |
| 23 | 32 |
|
| 20 | 27 | |
|
| 2 | 3 | |
|
| 28 | 38 | |
| Ventriculoperitoneal shunt | 44 | 60 | |
| Number of hormonal dysfunctions in one patient | 0 | 19 | 26 |
| 1 | 16 | 22 | |
| 2 | 17 | 23 | |
| 3 | 15 | 21 | |
| 4 | 6 | 8 | |
| Growth hormone treated |
| 36 | 49 |
Number of patients and percent of the population or the subgroup are shown.
Linear mixed model analysis with pre- (A) and post-diagnosis (B) growth predictors.
| A | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Birth(n = 30) | Diagnosis(n = 41) | Follow-up(n = 73) | Main effects | Time * Predictor | Birth vs.Diagnosis | Diagnosis vs Follow-up | ||||||
| Mean | (SD) | Mean | (SD) | Mean | (SD) | p-value | p-value | 95% CI | 95% CI | ||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| -0.02 | 1.28 | -0.71 | 0.98 | -2.25 | 1.34 | 0.072 | 0.015 | -0.106 to 1.447 |
| |||
|
| -0.1 | 0.49 | -0.19 | 1.29 | -1.4 | 1.18 | -1.238 to 1.622 |
| |||||
|
| -0.13 | 0.61 | -0.58 | 1.22 | -0.65 | 1.24 | -0.529 to 1.492 | -0.760 to 1.049 | |||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| -0.25 | 0.83 | -0.52 | 1.13 | -1.72 | 1.24 | 0.825 | 0.459 | |||||
|
| 0.25 | 1.27 | -0.56 | 1.14 | -1.56 | 1.68 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| 0.39 | 1.53 | -0.97 | 0.35 | -1.49 | 1.61 | 0.612 | 0.333 | |||||
|
| -0.23 | 0.81 | -0.48 | 1.22 | -1.67 | 1.38 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| -0.28 | 0.60 | -0.90 | 0.39 | -0.91 | 1.20 | 0.943 | 0.121 | |||||
|
| -0.02 | 1.09 | -0.49 | 1.19 | -1.70 | 1.42 | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| Mean | (SD) | Mean | (SD) | p-value | p-value | 95% CI | |||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
| -0.45 | 1.06 | -1.29 | 1.27 | 0.157 | 0.011 |
| |||||||
| -0.81 | 1.32 | -2.39 | 1.44 |
| |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| -0.74 | 1.00 | -1.53 | 1.55 | 0.766 | 0.056 |
| ||||||
|
| -0.14 | 1.27 | -1.76 | 1.20 |
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| -0.40 | 1.26 | -1.71 | 1.45 | 0.227 | 0.073 | |||||||
|
| -0.73 | 0.89 | -1.48 | 1.37 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| -0.67 | 1.18 | -1.40 | 1.06 | 0.959 | 0.208 | |||||||
|
| -0.82 | 0.82 | -1.68 | 1.99 | |||||||||
|
| -0.55 | 0.64 | -1.95 | 1.06 | |||||||||
|
| -0.08 | 1.36 | -1.74 | 1.23 | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
|
| -0.61 | 1.00 | -1.91 | 1.43 | 0.228 | 0.530 | |||||||
|
| -0.48 | 1.25 | -1.34 | 1.35 | |||||||||
Mean length/height SDS and standard deviation at birth, diagnosis, and follow-up are shown. Significant 95% confidential intervals for time*predictor interaction are flagged (♦).
Fig 2Mean length/height SDS at birth, diagnosis, and follow-up.
By age (A), patient gender (B), and growth hormone replacement therapy (GHT) at any time (C) or ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) (D).
Fig 3IGF-1 Z-score versus follow-up time of subjects who received growth hormone therapy (GHT) at any time point (solid dots) and those with no GHT (hollow dots).
Mean (SD) IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 Z-scores of 72 subjects at follow-up.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | |
|
| -1.26 (1.71) | -0.99 (1.51) | -1.40 (1.27) | -1.43 (0.94) |
| | -1.03 to 0.49 | -0.50 to 0.55 | ||
|
| 0.60 (1.64) | -1.28 (1.52) | -0.80 (0.84) | -1.47 (1.11) |
| | 0.58 to 3.18 | -0.26 to 1.61 | ||
|
| -2.56 (0.96) | -0.15 (1.16) | -2.23 (1.08) | -0.87 (0.72) |
| | -2.93 to -1.90 | -1.79 to -0.94 | ||
|
| -0.82 (1.63) | -1.59 (1.01) | -1.36 (1.17) | -1.50 (1.01) |
| | 0.01 to 1.53 | -0.39 to 0.68 | ||
|
| -1.47(2.06) | -0.99 (1.39) | -1.90 (1.46) | -1.23 (0.89) |
| | -1.51 to 0.54 | -1.39 to 0.05 | ||
* Significant at p < 0,05
** significant at p < 0,01
GHD growth hormone deficiency, GHT growth hormone therapy