BACKGROUND: Estimation of the risk of adverse long-term outcomes such as second malignant neoplasms and infertility often requires reproducible quantification of exposures. The method for quantification should be easily utilized and valid across different study populations. The widely used Alkylating Agent Dose (AAD) score is derived from the drug dose distribution of the study population and thus cannot be used for comparisons across populations as each will have a unique distribution of drug doses. METHODS: We compared the performance of the Cyclophosphamide Equivalent Dose (CED), a unit for quantifying alkylating agent exposure independent of study population, to the AAD. Comparisons included associations from three Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) outcome analyses, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and goodness of fit based on the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). RESULTS: The CED and AAD performed essentially identically in analyses of risk for pregnancy among the partners of male CCSS participants, risk for adverse dental outcomes among all CCSS participants and risk for premature menopause among female CCSS participants, based on similar associations, lack of statistically significant differences between the areas under the ROC curves and similar model fit values for the AIC between models including the two measures of exposure. CONCLUSION: The CED is easily calculated, facilitating its use for patient counseling. It is independent of the drug dose distribution of a particular patient population, a characteristic that will allow direct comparisons of outcomes among epidemiological cohorts. We recommend the use of the CED in future research assessing cumulative alkylating agent exposure.
BACKGROUND: Estimation of the risk of adverse long-term outcomes such as second malignant neoplasms and infertility often requires reproducible quantification of exposures. The method for quantification should be easily utilized and valid across different study populations. The widely used Alkylating Agent Dose (AAD) score is derived from the drug dose distribution of the study population and thus cannot be used for comparisons across populations as each will have a unique distribution of drug doses. METHODS: We compared the performance of the Cyclophosphamide Equivalent Dose (CED), a unit for quantifying alkylating agent exposure independent of study population, to the AAD. Comparisons included associations from three Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) outcome analyses, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and goodness of fit based on the Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC). RESULTS: The CED and AAD performed essentially identically in analyses of risk for pregnancy among the partners of male CCSS participants, risk for adverse dental outcomes among all CCSS participants and risk for premature menopause among female CCSS participants, based on similar associations, lack of statistically significant differences between the areas under the ROC curves and similar model fit values for the AIC between models including the two measures of exposure. CONCLUSION: The CED is easily calculated, facilitating its use for patient counseling. It is independent of the drug dose distribution of a particular patient population, a characteristic that will allow direct comparisons of outcomes among epidemiological cohorts. We recommend the use of the CED in future research assessing cumulative alkylating agent exposure.
Authors: W M Crist; J R Anderson; J L Meza; C Fryer; R B Raney; F B Ruymann; J Breneman; S J Qualman; E Wiener; M Wharam; T Lobe; B Webber; H M Maurer; S S Donaldson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M Pfreundschuh; D Hasenclever; M Loeffler; G Ehninger; N Schmitz; H Kirchner; P Koch; B Lathan; U Rueffer; M Sextro; J Franklin; H Tesch; V Diehl Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: S Pavlovsky; M T Santarelli; F S Muriel; I Fernández; I Garcia; L Schwartz; C Montero; F L Sanahuja; H Magnasco; A Costa Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 1992-07 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: M R Sertoli; G Santini; T Chisesi; A M Congiu; A Rubagotti; A Contu; L Salvagno; P Coser; A Porcellini; M Vespignani Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1994-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Wassim Chemaitilly; Ann C Mertens; Pauline Mitby; John Whitton; Marilyn Stovall; Yutaka Yasui; Leslie L Robison; Charles A Sklar Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-02-21 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: J P Neglia; D L Friedman; Y Yasui; A C Mertens; S Hammond; M Stovall; S S Donaldson; A T Meadows; L L Robison Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2001-04-18 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Charles A Sklar; Ann C Mertens; Pauline Mitby; John Whitton; Marilyn Stovall; Catherine Kasper; Jean Mulder; Daniel Green; H Stacy Nicholson; Yutaka Yasui; Leslie L Robison Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-07-05 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Yadav Sapkota; Carmen L Wilson; Asifa K Zaidi; Wonjong Moon; Klementina Fon Tacer; Lu Lu; Qi Liu; Jessica Baedke; Rikeenkumar Dhaduk; Zhaoming Wang; Wassim Chemaitilly; Matthew J Krasin; Fred B Berry; Jinghui Zhang; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Daniel M Green; Yutaka Yasui Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Frank G Keller; Sharon M Castellino; Lu Chen; Qinglin Pei; Stephan D Voss; Kathleen M McCarten; Stacy L Senn; Allen B Buxton; Rizvan Bush; Louis S Constine; Cindy L Schwartz Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-05-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Rebecca A Clark; Sogol Mostoufi-Moab; Yutaka Yasui; Ngoc Khanh Vu; Charles A Sklar; Tarek Motan; Russell J Brooke; Todd M Gibson; Kevin C Oeffinger; Rebecca M Howell; Susan A Smith; Zhe Lu; Leslie L Robison; Wassim Chemaitilly; Melissa M Hudson; Gregory T Armstrong; Paul C Nathan; Yan Yuan Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Eugene Suh; Kayla L Stratton; Wendy M Leisenring; Paul C Nathan; Jennifer S Ford; David R Freyer; Jennifer L McNeer; Wendy Stock; Marilyn Stovall; Kevin R Krull; Charles A Sklar; Joseph P Neglia; Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin C Oeffinger; Leslie L Robison; Tara O Henderson Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Israel Fernandez-Pineda; Andrew M Davidoff; Lu Lu; Bhaskar N Rao; Carmen L Wilson; D Kumar Srivastava; James L Klosky; Monica L Metzger; Matthew J Krasin; Kirsten K Ness; Ching-Hon Pui; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Charles A Sklar; Daniel M Green; Wassim Chemaitilly Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Anne-Marie Charpentier; Amy Lee Chong; Genevieve Gingras-Hill; Sameera Ahmed; Candemir Cigsar; Abha A Gupta; Ellen Greenblatt; David C Hodgson Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Laura van Iersel; Zhenghong Li; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Tara M Brinkman; Kari L Bjornard; Carmen L Wilson; Daniel M Green; Thomas E Merchant; Ching-Hon Pui; Rebecca M Howell; Susan A Smith; Gregory T Armstrong; Melissa M Hudson; Leslie L Robison; Kirsten K Ness; Amar Gajjar; Kevin R Krull; Charles A Sklar; Hanneke M van Santen; Wassim Chemaitilly Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Hanneke M van Santen; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Marianne D van de Wetering; W Hamish Wallace Journal: Horm Res Paediatr Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 2.852