| Literature DB >> 36064680 |
Sruthi Sairaman1, M S Nivedhitha1, Deepti Shrivastava2, Meshal Aber Al Onazi3, Hmoud Ali Algarni3, Mohammed Mustafa4, Ali Robaian Alqahtani4, Nouf AlQahtani5, Kavalipurapu Venkata Teja6, Krishnamachari Janani7, Rajalakshmanan Eswaramoorthy8, M P Sudhakar8, Mohammad Khursheed Alam9, Kumar Chandan Srivastava10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the past years, polysaccharide-based scaffolds have emerged as the most promising material for tissue engineering. In the present study, carrageenan, an injectable scaffold has been used owing to its advantage and superior property. Cissus quadrangularis, a natural agent was incorporated into the carrageenan scaffold. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the antioxidant activity and biocompatibility of this novel material.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant activity; Carrageenan; Cissus quadrangularis; Dentin–pulp complex; Hydrogel; Regeneration; Scaffold; Tissue engineering
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36064680 PMCID: PMC9442992 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02409-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 3.747
Fig. 1A Commercially available Cissus quadrangularis powder; B Carrageenan hydrogel (control); C 10% w/v Cissus quadrangularis hydrogel; D 20% w/v Cissus quadrangularis hydrogel; E 30% w/v Cissus quadrangularis hydrogel
Fig. 2Comparative analysis of antioxidant activity among the study groups
Post-hoc evaluation of antioxidant activity among study groups
| Pair-wise comparison groups | Mean difference | P value | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||
| Group II | − 3.867 | .000¶ | − 5.35 | − 2.39 |
| Group III | − 4.400 | .000¶ | − 5.88 | − 2.92 |
| Group IV | − 2.533 | .000¶ | − 4.01 | − 1.05 |
| Group I | 3.867 | .000¶ | 2.39 | 5.35 |
| Group III | − .533 | .776 | − 2.01 | .95 |
| Group IV | 1.333 | .092 | − .15 | 2.81 |
| Group I | 4.400 | .000¶ | 2.92 | 5.88 |
| Group II | .533 | .776 | − .95 | 2.01 |
| Group IV | 1.867 | .008€ | .39 | 3.35 |
| Group I | 2.533 | .000¶ | 1.05 | 4.01 |
| Group II | − 1.333 | .092 | − 2.81 | .15 |
| Group III | − 1.867 | .008€ | − 3.35 | − .39 |
Group I: Carrageenan hydrogel (without any addition of cissus quadran-gularis; Group II: Carrageenan hydrogel with 10% w/v of Cissus quadrangularis aqueous extracts; Group III: Carrageenan hydrogel with 20% w/v of Cissus quadrangularis aqueous extracts; Group IV: Carrageenan hydrogel with 30% w/v of Cissus quadrangularis aqueous extracts; Intergroup comparison was carried out with one-way ANOVA, which showed a statistically significant difference in antioxidant activity
¶p < 0.001; €P < 0.01
Fig. 3Comparative analysis of biocompatibility among the study groups
Post-hoc evaluation of biocompatibility among study groups
| Pair-wise comparison groups | Mean difference | P value | 95% confidence interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower bound | Upper bound | |||
| Group II | − 7.333 | .000¶ | − 9.52 | − 5.15 |
| Group III | − 19.067 | .000¶ | − 21.25 | − 16.88 |
| Group IV | − 22.333 | .000¶ | − 24.52 | − 20.15 |
| Group I | 7.333 | .000¶ | 5.15 | 9.52 |
| Group III | − 11.733 | .000¶ | − 13.92 | − 9.55 |
| Group IV | − 15.000 | .000¶ | − 17.18 | − 12.82 |
| Group I | 19.067 | .000¶ | 16.88 | 21.25 |
| Group II | 11.733 | .000¶ | 9.55 | 13.92 |
| Group IV | − 3.267 | .001€ | − 5.45 | − 1.08 |
| Group I | 22.333 | .000¶ | 20.15 | 24.52 |
| Group III | 15.000 | .000¶ | 12.82 | 17.18 |
| Group IV | 3.267 | .001€ | 1.08 | 5.45 |
Group I: Carrageenan hydrogel (without any addition of Cissus quadrangularis; Group II: Carrageenan hydrogel with 10% w/v of Cissus quadrangularis aqueous extracts; Group III: Carrageenan hydrogel with 20% w/v of Cissus quadrangularis aqueous extracts; Group IV: Carrageenan hydrogel with 30% w/v of Cissus quadrangularis aqueous extracts; Intergroup comparison was carried out with one-way ANOVA, which showed a statistically significant difference in biocompatibility
¶p < 0.001; €P < 0.01
Fig. 4A Porous microstructure of carrageenan hydrogel. B 10% w/v aqueous extract of Cissus quadrangularis hydrogel showing evenly dispersed particles of Cissus quadrangularis C 20% w/v aqueous extract of Cissus quadrangularis hydrogel showing evenly dispersed dense arrangement of Cissus quadrangularis particles. D 30% w/v aqueous extract of Cissus quadrangularis hydrogel showing clumping of Cissus quadrangularis particles
Fig. 5Higher magnification view of 30% w/v Cissus quadrangularis hydrogel (Group IV) with evident clumping of Cissus quadrangularis particles