| Literature DB >> 36062175 |
Hong Sun1, Weiqun Wang1, Shouyuan Zhang1, Chenglei Lin1.
Abstract
Purpose: To observe the correlation between nutritional status, bone age, and sexual development in children and adolescents.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36062175 PMCID: PMC9436596 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8325756
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Age distribution of 895 children and adolescents (n, %).
| Age | Male ( | Female ( | Total ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 years∼ | 61 (13.1%) | 28 (6.5%) | 89 (9.9%) |
| 6 years∼ | 82 (17.6%) | 94 (21.9%) | 176 (19.7%) |
| 8 years∼ | 87 (18.7%) | 192 (44.8%) | 279 (31.2%) |
| 10 years∼ | 150 (32.2%) | 98 (22.8%) | 248 (27.7%) |
| 12 years∼ | 76 (16.3%) | 17 (4.0%) | 93 (10.4%) |
| 14 years∼ | 10 (2.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 10 (1.1%) |
Nutritional status and bone age level of children and adolescents (n, M ± SD).
| Male | Age (years) | Bone age (years) | BAD |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emaciation group ( | 9.10 ± 2.31 | 8.61 ± 2.39 | −0.48 ± 1.39 | 20.38 | <0.001 |
| Normal group ( | 9.25 ± 2.77 | 9.13 ± 3.15 | −0.13 ± 1.08 | ||
| Overweight group ( | 10.45 ± 2.21 | 10.88 ± 2.70 | 0.43 ± 1.12# | ||
| Obesity group ( | 9.52 ± 2.32 | 10.55 ± 2.83 | 1.03 ± 1.13 | ||
|
| |||||
| Female | Age (years) | Bone age (years) | BAD |
|
|
| Emaciation group ( | 9.15 ± 2.22 | 8.48 ± 1.84 | −0.67 ± 1.08 | 20.33 | <0.001 |
| Normal group ( | 8.98 ± 1.82 | 9.00 ± 2.35 | 0.01 ± 1.12 | ||
| Overweight group ( | 8.76 ± 1.72 | 9.56 ± 1.88 | 0.80 ± 0.93# | ||
| Obesity group ( | 8.14 ± 1.77 | 9.42 ± 2.28 | 1.27 ± 0.87 | ||
Note. Compared with the emaciation group, P < 0.05; compared with the normal group, #P < 0.05; compared with the overweight group, △P < 0.05.
Nutritional status and bone age assessment of children and adolescents (n, %).
| Male | Retardation of bone age | Normal bone age | Advancement of bone age |
|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI)# |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emaciation group ( | 4 (44.44%) | 4 (44.44%) | 1 (11.11%) | 63.55 | <0.001 | 0.888 (0.108–7.292) | 3.150 (0.822–12.067) |
| Normal group ( | 64 (20.25%) | 213 (67.41%) | 39 (12.34%) | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| Overweight group ( | 6 (6.82%) | 52 (59.09%) | 30 (34.09%) | 3.674 (2.112–6.391) | 0.288 (0.120–0.690) | ||
| Obesity group ( | 2 (3.77%) | 24 (45.28%) | 27 (50.94%) | 7.376 (3.911–13.909) | 0.154 (0.037–0.651) | ||
|
| |||||||
| Female | Retardation of bone age | Normal bone age | Advancement of bone age |
|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI)# |
|
| |||||||
| Emaciation group ( | 2 (50.00%) | 2 (50.00%) | 0 (0.00%) | 71.11 | <0.001 | — | 4.092 (0.566–29.599) |
| Normal group ( | 65 (19.64%) | 201 (60.72%) | 65 (19.64%) | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| Overweight group ( | 0 (0.00%) | 38 (58.46%) | 27 (41.54%) | 2.908 (1.656–5.105) | — | ||
| Obesity group ( | 0 (0.00%) | 6 (20.69%) | 23 (79.31%) | 15.687 (6.137–40.099) | — | ||
Note. Compared with the normal group, the risk of advancement of bone age; #compared with the normal group, the risk of retardation of bone age.
Nutritional status and sexual development of children and adolescents (n, %).
| Gender | Age | Normal group (developed/undeveloped, development rate) | Overweight + obesity group (developed/undeveloped, development rate) | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 6 years∼8 years | 0/54 (0.00%) | 0/24 (0.00%) | — |
| 8 years∼10 years | 0/60 (0.00%) | 3/26 (11.54%) | — | |
| 10 years∼12 years | 43/95 (45.26%) | 30/52 (57.69%) | 1.275 (0.717–2.267) | |
|
| ||||
| Female | 6 years∼8 years | 12/69 (17.39%) | 9/24 (37.5%) | 2.156 (0.808–5.752) |
| 8 years∼10 years | 108/147 (73.47%) | 36/44 (81.82%) | 1.114 (0.672–1.847) | |
| 10 years∼12 years | 73/80 (91.25%) | 15/16 (93.75%) | 1.027 (0.474–2.225) | |
Figure 1Relationship between nutritional status and early maturity of female children.