Literature DB >> 36060047

One-year Outcomes Following Internal Ligation Suture Removal in 350 mm2 Baerveldt Tube Implant Surgery.

Francesco Stringa1, Ruth Chen2, Pavi Agrawal3.   

Abstract

Aim: Long-term data of the postoperative management following Baerveldt tube surgery (BVT) is currently limited. This study aims to evaluate the outcome and the safety profile of internal ligation suture removal after BVT surgery for refractory glaucoma. Materials and methods: A prospective, consecutive, non-comparative case series of patients previously undergoing BVT 350 mm2 surgery with 0.4 mg/mL mitomycin C (MMC), 3/0 intraluminal suture (Supramid) insertion, and 10/0 nylon external ligation suture(s). For each patient, data was collected over 12 months after internal ligation suture removal. Follow-up assessments looked at intraocular pressure (IOP), complication rate, and postoperative number of glaucoma medications. Definition of success was adopted as per the World Glaucoma Association recommendations.
Results: Twenty-four patients were included. On average, Supramid was removed at 22 ± 18.2 weeks following BVT surgery. Preoperatively, the mean IOP was 30.9 ± 12.6 mm Hg and the average antiglaucoma medications were 1.95 ± 1.13. At 12 months, the mean IOP was 15.2 ± 5.3 mm Hg and the mean number of glaucoma medications was 1.3 ± 0.2. Qualified success with IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg and IOP ≤ 15 mm Hg was achieved in 62.5% and 33.3%, respectively. Only two patients developed hypotony following Supramid removal; both resolved spontaneously within 1 month.
Conclusion: Our results show a good IOP reduction and safety profile at 1 year from internal ligation suture removal following BVT. A drop in IOP of approximately 50% from the preoperative IOP can be expected. How to cite this article: Stringa F, Chen R, Agrawal P. One-year Outcomes Following Internal Ligation Suture Removal in 350 mm2 Baerveldt Tube Implant Surgery. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2022;16(1):20-23.
Copyright © 2022; The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baerveldt implant; Glaucoma drainage devices; Glaucoma surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 36060047      PMCID: PMC9385391          DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract        ISSN: 0974-0333


Introduction

Glaucoma drainage devices (GDD) are becoming an increasingly popular surgical intervention among glaucoma specialists in the management of refractory glaucoma.[1] With a growing body of long-term evidence for their use, increasing surgical experience as well concerns over the potential complications associated with augmented trabeculectomy surgery, GDDs have been used as a primary surgical intervention.[2] Glaucoma drainage devices are subdivided into either “valved” or “non-valved” depending on whether an internal flow restriction mechanism is present to limit aqueous humor flow. The Baerveldt implant (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA) consists of a silicone tube connected to a flexible barium impregnated 250 mm2 or 350 mm silicone end-plate.[3] These non-valved implants require a temporary restriction of aqueous flow by internal and/or external tube ligation until encapsulation around the end plate has occurred. This maneuver reduces the risk of early postoperative hypotony. The internal ligation suture can then be removed in order to achieve target intraocular pressure (IOP). The use of a 3-0 or 5-0 nylon braided Supramid (S. Jackson Inc., Alexandria, VA, USA) inserted in the tube's lumen with or without external ligation has been described to effectively control the IOP.[4] There is a lack of knowledge regarding the time to internal ligation suture removal following Baerveldt tube (BVT) implantation and the postoperative effect on IOP. This paper presents the 12-months outcomes following the removal of 3-0 Supramid internal ligation suture from a series of patients following 350 mm2 BVT surgery.

Materials and Methods

This study was a prospective, consecutive, non-comparative case series. Data was collected at the Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust. Formal ethics approval was not needed, although this study adheres to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and local clinical governance approval for data collection was obtained. The series included 24 eyes of 24 consecutive glaucoma patients in whom a 350 mm2 BVT (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA) had been implanted over a period of 4 years between March 2014 and July 2018. All tubes were checked for patency by injecting basic saline solution (BSS) through a Rycroft cannula at the plate's insertion of the tube. Patency was confirmed when BSS was observed at the other end of the tube. All tubes were internally ligated using a 3-0 Supramid (S. Jackson Inc., Alexandria, VA, USA) suture. The internal ligation occupied approximately 50% of the tube's length and the portion outside the tube's end plate was appropriately trimmed and sutured to the sclera approximately 1 cm away from the silicone tube using 10-0 nylon suture. Additionally, an external 10-0 nylon ligation suture was placed around the tube, 1–2 mm from the end plate to temporarily stop aqueous outflow onto the endplate. A 2 mm relieving or venting incision (Sherwood slit) was performed with a 20G corneal/scleral knife 1.3 mm V-Lance (Alcon Laboratories Inc., Geneva, Switzerland) 1 mm anterior to external ligation suture to control the initial postoperative IOP. All the tubes were then covered with a human sclera donor patch graft. Postoperatively, if the IOP was deemed clinically suboptimal the argon-laser suture lysis of the external ligation suture was performed at week 3 or 4, when the Sherwood slit had closed. This was performed with Pascal 532nm photocoagulator green argon laser (Topcon Corp., Tokyo 174-8580, Japan) and Blumenthal suture lysis lens (Volk Optical Inc., 7893 Enterprise Drive, Mentor, United States). The setting used were 200 mW × 0.1 seconds and 100 μm laser spot's diameter. The internal 3-0 Supramid suture was removed in the operating theater when the IOP was considered clinically suboptimal, but not for at least 4 weeks following BVT surgery in order to allow end-plate encapsulation. All procedures were performed by either the consultant ophthalmic surgeon (PA) or the senior glaucoma fellow. After topical anesthesia with tetracaine hydrochloride 1% and local antisepsis with povidone iodine 5%, the conjunctiva was dissected down to sclera besides the Supramid and the suture exposed. The suture was then pulled out of the tube while checking for any signs of intraoperative hypotony (i.e., anterior chamber shallowing and/or eyeball softening) or extrusion of the tip of the silicone tube from the anterior chamber. The conjunctival wound was then sutured with a 10-0 nylon suture. Postoperative G. Chloramphenicol 1% minims QDS was administered for 7 days and all glaucoma medication was stopped. At each postoperative clinic visit, glaucoma medications were potentially reintroduced according to the IOP. Data collection included patient age, gender, glaucoma diagnosis and IOP, and number of glaucoma medications before 3-0 Supramid removal. Following stent removal, the IOP and number of medications were collected at each follow-up visit including day 1 and months 1, 3, 6, and 12. Patients who failed to attend follow-up visit in the reporting windows proposed by the World Glaucoma Association (WGA) Guidelines were excluded from this study.[5] The primary outcome measures were IOP reduction and the number of glaucoma medications at 12 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were complications owing to the suture stent removal, timing of stent removal (i.e., number of weeks following Baerveldt tube implantation), and the success rate. We defined success in accordance to WGA guidelines as below. IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg and ≥ 6 mm Hg and ≥ 20% reduction from baseline with no additional glaucoma procedures IOP ≤ 18 mm Hg and ≥ 6 mm Hg and ≥ 20% reduction from baseline with no additional glaucoma procedures IOP ≤ 15 mm Hg and ≥ 6 mm Hg and ≥ 20% reduction from baseline with no additional glaucoma procedures Complete success was defined as achieving the above outcomes without the need for glaucoma medications, while a qualified success was achieving the outcomes with or without medications. Numerical hypotony was defined as IOP < 6 mm Hg on two consecutive follow-ups. The data was recorded with Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation) and the statistical analysis was executed with GraphPad Prism Version 8.2.0 (GraphPad Software Inc.). D'Agostino–Pearson test was used to test for the presence or absence of a normal distribution in the data. Comparison between preoperative and postoperative data was carried out with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, with a p-value of 0.05 or less considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Twenty-four eyes from 24 patients were included in this study. There were 10 females and 14 males, and the mean age was 62.2 ± 13.5 years (range from 82-years). Table 1 shows the preoperative characteristics. The mean time to Supramid removal was 22 ± 18.2 weeks (range 4–68 weeks) from Baerveldt tube implantation. The mean IOP reduced from 30.4 ± 12.3 mm Hg preoperatively to 15.2 ± 5.3 mm Hg at 52 weeks follow-up (p < 0.001), representing a reduction of 46.1 ± 4.3% (Fig. 1). The mean number of antiglaucoma medications dropped from 1.9 ± 1.1 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 0.2 at 52 weeks (p = 0.078).
Table 1

Patients’ characteristics and glaucoma etiologies

Demographics Mean (%)±SD
Males11 (45.8%)
Females13 (54.2%)
Age62.2 ± 13.5
Caucasian17 (70.8%)
Afro-Caribbean5 (20.8%)
Asian2 (8.3%)
Glaucoma etiology
POAG7 (29.2%)
Secondary to corneal graft7 (29.2%)
Uveitic glaucoma5 (20.8%)
NVG3 (12.5%)
Secondary to retina surgery2 (8.3%)
Secondary to aphakia1 (4.2%)
JOAG1 (4.2%)

SD, standard deviation; POAG, primary open angle glaucoma; NVG, neovascular glaucoma; JOAG, juvenile open angle glaucoma

Fig. 1

Mean IOP (mm Hg) over time with 95% confidence intervals. IOP, intraocular pressure

Patients’ characteristics and glaucoma etiologies SD, standard deviation; POAG, primary open angle glaucoma; NVG, neovascular glaucoma; JOAG, juvenile open angle glaucoma Mean IOP (mm Hg) over time with 95% confidence intervals. IOP, intraocular pressure The complete and qualified success rates are summarized in Table 2. The qualified success rate for an IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg at 12 months was 62.5% (15/24 eyes). For a more stringent IOP of ≤ 15 mm Hg, the qualified success rate was 33.3% (8/24 eyes).
Table 2

Statistical comparison of outcome measures and success rates

I Outcome measures Preop (n = 24) Mean ± SD Postop (n = 24) Mean ± SD p-value
IOP (mm Hg)30.4 ± 12.315.2 ± 5.31<0.05
Number of agents1.9 ± 1.11.3 ± 0.9>0.05
II Outcome measures Mean ± SD Max Min
Removal timing (weeks)22 ± 18.2684
Complications n (%)
Hypotony2 (8.3)
Vitreous in the tube1 (4.1)
Total3 (12.5)
Definitions of success Complete Qualified
IOP ≤ 21 / ≥ 6 mm Hg; ≥20% drop62.5%16.6%
IOP ≤ 18 / ≥6 mm Hg; ≥20% drop58.3%12.5%
IOP ≤ 15 / ≥6 mm Hg; ≥20% drop33.3%8.3%

IOP, Intraocular pressure

Statistical comparison of outcome measures and success rates IOP, Intraocular pressure Pearson's Chi-square test showed no statistical correlation (p = 0.382) between the timing of stenting suture removal and IOP reduction at 12 months. However, there was a strong statistical correlation between preoperative IOP and the percentage of IOP reduction at 52 weeks (p = 0.007, Fig. 2).
Figs 2A and B

Correlations (Pearson's r test) between: (A) number of weeks from Baerveldt implant to suture stent removal and percentage of IOP reduction at 52 weeks; (B) Preoperative IOP (i.e., before suture stent removal) and percentage of IOP reduction at 52 weeks. IOP, intraocular pressure

Correlations (Pearson's r test) between: (A) number of weeks from Baerveldt implant to suture stent removal and percentage of IOP reduction at 52 weeks; (B) Preoperative IOP (i.e., before suture stent removal) and percentage of IOP reduction at 52 weeks. IOP, intraocular pressure There were no cases of postoperative leak or corneal endothelium-tube touch. Hypotony was reported in two patients (8.3%). In both cases, this was noted at day one postoperatively and persisted for 2 weeks in one case and 3 weeks in the other case. The latter was treated with atropine 1% eye drops once a day, in addition to standard postoperative treatment, until the hypotony had resolved. Both of them were managed conservatively through observation and medical management. No clinically significant signs of hypotony were observed, such as choroidal effusion, hypotony maculopathy, striae of Descemet's membrane, or shallowing of anterior chamber. One patient with aphakic glaucoma underwent an anterior vitrectomy at 1 week following Supramid removal due to vitreous occlusion of the tube causing an IOP spike of 55 mm Hg; the IOP settled to 18 mm Hg with two glaucoma medications at 12 months.

Discussion

Over the last quarter of a century, there has been great research and evolution in the size, shape, and biomaterials of GDDs, as well as the surgical technique in a quest to reduce complications and improve their surgical success. The regulation of aqueous outflow onto the end plate is critical in preventing early onset hypotony. Valved GDDs, such as the Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV), have a theoretical advantage of restricting aqueous outflow thus minimizing hypotony. It consists of two silicone membranes that close below an IOP of 8–10 mm Hg, thus regulating aqueous outflow. However, non-valved GDDs, and in particular the BVT, have been shown to be more effective in lowering IOP compared to the AGV but with a higher rate of postoperative hypotony.[6-9] These non-valved GDDs rely on fibrovascular encapsulation of the end plate to provide enough resistance to aqueous outflow in order to prevent hypotony. Encapsulation can take 4–6 weeks to develop and hence in the interim, flow restriction with either an internal ligation suture or external ligation suture, or both is required.[10,11] On the contrary, ensuring an early postoperative outflow rate in the normal intraocular pressure range can be achieved by performing venting slits, following insertion of 3-0 Supramid. This could prevent too high IOP in the early postoperative period while allowing for encapsulation at the tube's plate.[12] In our case series, all tubes were flow tested before insertion and they all resulted in patent. Given the variation in manufacturing conditions, flow testing all glaucoma drainage devices before insertion is of paramount importance in order to avoid the risk of intraoperative complications.[13] All 350 mm2 BVTs were internally ligated with a 3-0 Supramid suture as well as externally ligated with a 10-0 nylon suture, which was then suture lysed after 3–4 weeks if the IOP was suboptimal. The Supramid internal ligation suture was then fully removed after a minimum of 4 weeks for further IOP lowering if clinically indicated. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report 12-month outcomes of internal 3-0 Supramid suture removal following 350 mm BVT surgery. At 12 months we report a 46% decrease in IOP and 32% reduction in number of antiglaucoma medications. The final mean IOP was 15.2 ± 5.3 mm Hg, similar to the 3 years IOP outcome in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) trial reported as 13.0 ± 4.9 mm Hg.[14] A significant proportion of the patients in this series had moderate to advanced glaucoma and hence required adjunctive antiglaucoma medication following Supramid removal; the mean being 1.3 ± 0.9 at 12 months. This compares similarly to the 12 months outcomes in the TVT study where the mean number of medications in the Baerveldt group was 1.3 ± 1.3, and explains why only 4 eyes of 24 (16.6%) had a complete success for an IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg in our study. We also identified a strong correlation between the IOP before the internal ligation suture being removed and percentage drop in IOP following its removal. Patients with high-flow glaucoma in which the IOP was >30 mm Hg before Supramid removal had a greater percentage drop in IOP, as can be seen in Figure 2. The “high-flow” aqueous in these patients can partially overcome the fibrovascular scarring at the end plate and hence earlier Supramid removal should not be considered in these patients, to mitigate the risk of hypotony. The time to Supramid removal was not correlated with percentage drop in IOP (Fig. 2) and suggests that sufficient fibrovascular resistance has developed at the end plate at 4–6 weeks following BVT surgery, and that any further resistance which may develop after that time point does not hinder the success of Supramid removal. The complications rate was relatively low. Two patients had hypotony, although there were no related clinical signs, nor vision loss and there was no need for any surgical reintervention. Only one patient had to be brought back to theater for anterior vitrectomy due to vitreous in the anterior chamber. The main limitation of this study is the limited sample size. Further subgroup analysis with glaucoma etiology, alternative internal ligation suture removal analysis as well as longer term follow-up will provide further insight into outcome measures.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the removal of the internal ligation suture following BVT surgery can significantly reduce the IOP at 12 months with a smaller medication index. Higher preoperative pressures lead to greater percentage reductions in IOP and hence these patients could be at higher risk of hypotony. A proactive postoperative management regime following BVT surgery is needed to ensure the best possible outcome is achieved.
  13 in total

1.  Five-year treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt comparison study.

Authors:  Donald L Budenz; Keith Barton; Steven J Gedde; William J Feuer; Joyce Schiffman; Vital P Costa; David G Godfrey; Yvonne M Buys
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery: a survey of the American Glaucoma Society in 2008.

Authors:  Manishi A Desai; Steven J Gedde; William J Feuer; Wei Shi; Philip P Chen; Richard K Parrish
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging       Date:  2011 May-Jun

3.  Complications of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants.

Authors:  Q H Nguyen; D L Budenz; R K Parrish
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-05

4.  Prevention of early hypotony associated with Molteno implants by a new occluding stent technique.

Authors:  M B Sherwood; M F Smith
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  Initial clinical experience with the baerveldt implant in complicated glaucomas.

Authors:  M A Lloyd; G Baerveldt; D K Heuer; D S Minckler; J F Martone
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Study: Five-Year Treatment Outcomes.

Authors:  Panos G Christakis; Jeffrey W Kalenak; James C Tsai; David Zurakowski; Jeffrey A Kammer; Paul J Harasymowycz; Juan J Mura; Louis B Cantor; Iqbal I K Ahmed
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Three-year follow-up of the tube versus trabeculectomy study.

Authors:  Steven J Gedde; Joyce C Schiffman; William J Feuer; Leon W Herndon; James D Brandt; Donald L Budenz
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 8.  Comparison of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation and trabeculectomy for glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tan HaiBo; Kang Xin; Lu ShiHeng; Liu Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Case Report of Complete Blockage of a Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant Following Insertion of a 3-0 Supramid Suture.

Authors:  Richard M H Lee; Yann Bouremel; Ian Eames; Steve Brocchini; Peng Tee Khaw
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  The Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: Methodology of a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Tube Shunt Surgery and Trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C.

Authors:  Steven J Gedde; Philip P Chen; Dale K Heuer; Kuldev Singh; Martha M Wright; William J Feuer; Joyce C Schiffman; Wei Shi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 14.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.