Literature DB >> 27544023

The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Study: Five-Year Treatment Outcomes.

Panos G Christakis1, Jeffrey W Kalenak2, James C Tsai3, David Zurakowski4, Jeffrey A Kammer5, Paul J Harasymowycz6, Juan J Mura7, Louis B Cantor8, Iqbal I K Ahmed9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare 2 frequently used aqueous shunts for the treatment of glaucoma.
DESIGN: International, multicenter, randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 18 years or older with uncontrolled glaucoma despite maximum tolerated medical therapy, many of whom had failed or were at high risk of failing trabeculectomy.
METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to receive an Ahmed-FP7 valve implant (New World Medical, Inc, Rancho Cucamonga, CA) or a Baerveldt-350 implant (Abbott Medical Optics, Inc, Santa Ana, CA) using a standardized surgical technique. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was failure, defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) outside the target range (5-18 mmHg) or reduced <20% from baseline for 2 consecutive visits after 3 months, severe vision loss, or de novo glaucoma surgery. Secondary outcomes measures included IOP, medication use, visual acuity, complications, and interventions.
RESULTS: A total of 238 patients were randomized; 124 received the Ahmed-FP7 implant, and 114 received the Baerveldt-350 implant. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Mean preoperative IOP was 31.4±10.8 mmHg on 3.1±1.0 glaucoma medications. At 5 years, the cumulative failure rate was 53% in the Ahmed group and 40% in the Baerveldt group (P = 0.04). The main reason for failure in both groups was high IOP, and the cumulative de novo glaucoma reoperation rate was 18% in the Ahmed group and 11% in the Baerveldt group (P = 0.22). Hypotony resulted in failure in 5 patients (4%) in the Baerveldt group compared with none in the Ahmed group (P = 0.02). Mean IOP was 16.6±5.9 mmHg in the Ahmed group (47% reduction) and 13.6±5.0 mmHg in the Baerveldt group (57% reduction, P = 0.001). Mean medication use was 1.8±1.5 mmHg in the Ahmed group (44% reduction) and 1.2±1.3 mmHg in the Baerveldt group (61% reduction, P = 0.03). The 2 groups had similar complication rates (Ahmed 63%, Baerveldt 69%) and intervention rates (Ahmed 41%, Baerveldt 41%). Most complications were transient, and most interventions were slit-lamp procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Both implants were effective in reducing IOP and the need for glaucoma medications. The Baerveldt group had a lower failure rate and a lower IOP on fewer medications than the Ahmed group, but had a small risk of hypotony that was not seen in the Ahmed group.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27544023     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  57 in total

1.  Ab interno tube ligation for refractory hypotony following non-valved glaucoma drainage device implantation.

Authors:  A Vergados; A A Mohite; Velota C T Sung
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  A cost minimisation analysis comparing iStent accompanying cataract surgery and selective laser trabeculoplasty versus topical glaucoma medications in a public healthcare setting in New Zealand.

Authors:  Kelvin Ngan; Ewan Fraser; Sophie Buller; Alex Buller
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Longer-term Baerveldt to Trabectome glaucoma surgery comparison using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Tigran Kostanyan; Tarek Shazly; Kevin B Kaplowitz; Steven Z Wang; Sushma Kola; Eric N Brown; Nils A Loewen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Intraocular pressure control of a novel glaucoma drainage device - in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Li-Jun Cui; Di-Chen Li; Jian Liu; Lei Zhang; Yao Xing
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: outcomes of the first 38 cases performed at Moorfields Eye Hospital.

Authors:  Chameen Samarawickrama; Nicholas Strouthidis; Mark R Wilkins
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Comparison of complications after Ahmed versus Baerveldt implant in glaucoma patients: one year follow-up.

Authors:  Sara Listyani Koentjoro; Widya Artini; Iwan Soebijantoro; Vira Wardhana Istiantoro; Emma Rusmayani; Rini Sulastiwaty; Zeiras Eka Djamal; Arini Safira Nurul Akbar; Muhammad Yoserizal
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Effect of shunt type on rates of tube-cornea touch and corneal decompensation after tube shunt surgery in uveitic glaucoma.

Authors:  Sapna Sinha; Allen Y Ganjei; Melih Ustaoglu; Zeba A Syed; Daniel Lee; Jonathan S Myers; Scott J Fudemberg; Reza Razeghinejad
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Treatment outcomes in the neovascular glaucoma tube versus trabeculectomy study.

Authors:  Kana Tokumo; Kaori Komatsu; Yuki Yuasa; Yumiko Murakami; Hideaki Okumichi; Kazuyuki Hirooka; Shunsuke Nakakura; Hitoshi Tabuchi; Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Short-term Postoperative Visual Acuity Decrease and Recovery after Ahmed Tube Shunt Procedure for Glaucoma.

Authors:  Yingna Liu; Lijuan Huang; Qian Zhao; Qian Liu; Robert L Stamper; Ying Han
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020-04-22

10.  Priorities and Treatment Preferences among Surgery-Naive Patients with Moderate to Severe Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Amanda K Bicket; Jimmy T Le; Carol Yorkgitis; Tianjing Li
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.