| Literature DB >> 36058933 |
Marcell Székely1, Tamás Ruttkay2, Ferenc Imre Suhai3, Áron Bóna4, Béla Merkely3, László Székely5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Refractory cardiogenic shock is still a major clinical challenge with high mortality rates, although several devices can be used to conquer this event. These devices have different advantages and disadvantages originating from their insertion or cannulation method, therefore many complications can occur during their use. The aim of our study was to develop and create prototypes of a novel minimal invasively insertable, transapical cannula for surgical ventricular assist devices, which uniquely incorporates the inflow and outflow routes for the blood of the patient in itself, therefore it enables the use for only one cannula for patients in cardiogenic shock.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; Heart failure; Left ventricular assist device
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36058933 PMCID: PMC9441023 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02826-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.174
Fig. 1Studied cardiac CT images in diastole showing our measurement. In (a) and (b), the anterior mitral leaflet can be seen in an opened position. In (c), measures of the coronary artery openings and the annulus are visualized. The measured dimensions are seen with different colors and labeled appropriately with their abbreviation given detailed in the text
Fig. 2Two renders of the double-lumened cannula (middle size) in the used modelling software in different views: a top view, b perspective view. The venous tube is marked in blue, and the arterial tube is marked in red. The yellow circular skirt was made to mark and hold the outer side of the apical wall. The spacers between the venous and arterial tubes are marked in green
Fig. 3Photographs of our 3D printed cannula prototypes. a Model printed from UltraVeroClear; b Model printed from PA2200. c Double-lumened cannula placed in a prepared, fixed human heart to depict the anatomical and optimal position of the cannula
Important measures regarding the length of the arterial tube of the different cannula sizes
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients number | 5 | 7 | 12 | |
| AWT (mm) min–max | 2.2–5 | 1.5–4.3 | 2.3–4.2 | 0.205 |
| Mean ± SD | 3.82 ± 1.19 | 2.84 ± 1.06 | 3.24 ± 0.65 | |
| AAV (mm) min–max | 91.2–101.66 | 101.66–112.12 | 112.12–122.6 | < 0.0001 |
| Mean ± SD | 97.52 ± 4.35 | 105.86 ± 3.52 | 116.82 ± 3.19 | |
| LM (mm) min–max | 10.3–14.5 | 10.7–14.6 | 10.7–15.8 | 0.649 |
| Mean ± SD | 12.84 ± 1.73 | 12.84 ± 1.39 | 13.47 ± 1.71 | |
| RCA (mm) min–max | 12–18.1 | 14.6–17.7 | 10.3–21 | 0.466 |
| Mean ± SD | 14.32 ± 2.48 | 16.04 ± 1.26 | 15.88 ± 3.08 | |
| Sum of the max. values (mm) | 124.76 | 134.12 | 147.8 | |
| Sum after the 5 mm correction (mm) | 129.76 | 139.12 | 152.8 |
AWT apical wall thickness, AAV distance between the inner side of the apex and the aortic valve annulus, LM distance between the aortic valve annulus and the left main coronary artery opening, RCA distance between the aortic valve annulus and the right coronary opening, SD standard deviation; Continuous variables are reported as mean and standard deviation; p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance
Significant measures for defining the length of the double-lumened part of the cannulas
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients number | 5 | 7 | 12 | |
| AMV (mm) min–max | 64.6–74 | 64.1–77.6 | 66.6–86 | 0.023 |
| Mean ± SD | 68.68 ± 3.52 | 70.71 ± 5.12 | 76.63 ± 6.45 | |
| Minimum of AMV (mm) | 64.6 | 64.1 | 66.6 | |
| Maximum of AWT (mm) | 5 | 4.3 | 4.2 | |
| Sum maximum of AWT and minimum of AMV (mm) | 69.6 | 68.4 | 70.8 |
AMV distance between the inner side of the apex and the margin of the anterior mitral leaflet in an opened position, AWT apical wall thickness of the left ventricle at the cannula penetration point, SD standard deviation; Continuous variables are reported as mean and standard deviation; p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance
Measures for defining the width of the venous part of the cannulas
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patients number | 5 | 7 | 12 | |
| D2 (mm) min–max | 36.2–49.8 | 29–59.4 | 35–63.2 | 0.043 |
| Mean ± SD | 42.44 ± 6.59 | 43.76 ± 9.17 | 51.98 ± 7.72 | |
| D3 (mm) min–max | 29.8–49 | 24.1–45.7 | 29.8–60 | 0.154 |
| Mean ± SD | 37.72 ± 7.29 | 34.9 ± 9.04 | 43 ± 8.99 | |
| Minimum of previous diameters (mm) | 29.8 | 24.1 | 29.8 |
D2, D3 inner diameters of the left ventricle between the interventricular septum and the anterior papillary muscle,SD standard deviation; Continuous variables are reported as mean and standard deviation; p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance
Critical diameters for assessing the space in the path of the arterial tube
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 (mm) min–max | 18.8–27.5 | 21.3–32.1 | 21–31.7 | 0.069 |
| Mean ± SD | 23.02 ± 3.08 | 26.07 ± 3.62 | 27.3 ± 3.13 | |
| I2 (mm) min–max | 20.2–32 | 26.7–41.3 | 24–46.5 | 0.018 |
| Mean ± SD | 26.32 ± 5.31 | 32.73 ± 5.12 | 35.7 ± 5.98 | |
| LVOT (mm) min–max | 16–35.7 | 19.8–38.1 | 22–38.3 | 0.236 |
| Mean ± SD | 25.96 ± 5.78 | 28.21 ± 5.81 | 29.76 ± 5.98 | |
| Annulus (mm) min–max | 18–32.2 | 19.7–34.2 | 22.7–34.6 | 0.075 |
| Mean ± SD | 24.82 ± 3.99 | 26.39 ± 4.39 | 28.26 ± 3.91 | |
| Minimum of previous diameters (mm) | 16 | 19.7 | 21 |
I1, I2 inner diameters of the infundibulum in 2 planes, LVOT diameter of the left ventricular outflow tract, Annulus: Diameter of the aortic valve annulus, SD standard deviation, Continuous variables are reported as mean and standard deviation; p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance