Literature DB >> 27818380

Novel minimally invasive surgical approach using an external ventricular assist device and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in refractory cardiogenic shock.

Koji Takeda1, Arthur R Garan2, Veli K Topkara2, Ajay J Kirtane2, Dimitri Karmpaliotis2, Paul Kurlansky1, Melana Yuzefpolskaya2, Paolo C Colombo2, Yoshifumi Naka1, Hiroo Takayama1.   

Abstract

Objectives: The use of short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has increased in the treatment of refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS). Percutaneous short-term MCS technology has emerged rapidly; however, limitations in flow and durability remain. We therefore investigated a minimally invasive surgical approach using an external ventricular assist device (VAD) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with RCS.
Methods: Twenty-five patients underwent minimally invasive external VAD insertion with a magnetically levitated centrifugal pump for various causes of cardiogenic shock between April 2010 and May 2016. An external VAD was established with left ventricular apical cannulation through a minithoracotomy and right or left axillary artery cannulation. In patients with biventricular failure or pulmonary complications, femoral venous cannulation was added as an additional inflow source, and ECMO was spliced into the external VAD circuit.
Results: Mean patient age was 58 ± 9.1 and 80% were men. All patients were in Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile I RCS. The aetiology of RCS was decompensated chronic heart failure in 13 (52%), and acute myocardial infarction in 12 (48%). Twenty-three (92%) received percutaneous short-term MCS prior to surgery. The procedure was performed without cardiopulmonary bypass in all patients. ECMO was added in 17 patients (68%) and explanted after a median of 4 days of support. The average flow obtained was 5.3 ± 1.1 l/min. The median duration of external VAD support was 22 days. Major complications during support included bleeding events in seven (28%) and cerebrovascular events in four (16%). The in-hospital mortality rate was 32%. Seventeen patients (68%) survived to the next destination including myocardial recovery in three (12%), device exchange to a durable VAD in 12 (48%) and heart transplantation in two (8%). The Kaplan-Meier survival rates at 6 months and 1 year were 92% and 77%, respectively. Conclusions: Our minimally invasive surgical approach using an external VAD is a feasible strategy for patients with cardiogenic shock who are refractory to percutaneous short-term MCS support.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiogenic shock; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27818380     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  10 in total

1.  Cardiac catheterization and percutaneous intervention procedures on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

Authors:  Cesar Y Guerrero-Miranda; Shelley A Hall
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

Review 2.  Awake and fully mobile patients on cardiac extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Darryl Abrams; A Reshad Garan; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

3.  Early venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation improves outcomes in post-cardiotomy shock.

Authors:  Amit Saha; Paul Kurlansky; Yuming Ning; Joseph Sanchez; Justin Fried; Lucas J Witer; Yuji Kaku; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Koji Takeda
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 4.  ECMO in cardiogenic shock and bridge to heart transplant.

Authors:  Mathew Jose Chakaramakkil; Cumaraswamy Sivathasan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-02-11

5.  Temporary mechanical circulatory support: insights and evolving strategies.

Authors:  Anvay Mulay; Talha Meeran; Ashish Gaur; Sandeep Sinha; Pravin Kulkarni; Neeraj Kamat; Satish Javali; Amish Jasapara; Vijay Shetty
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-01-09

Review 6.  Modalities of Exercise Training in Patients with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support.

Authors:  Christos Kourek; Serafim Nanas; Anastasia Kotanidou; Vasiliki Raidou; Maria Dimopoulou; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Andreas Karabinis; Stavros Dimopoulos
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-01-20

7.  Commentary: Unmapped waters-navigating a sea of institutional preferences in cardiogenic shock management.

Authors:  Michael Salna; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-04-18

8.  Extracorporeal Life Support and Temporary CentriMag Ventricular Assist Device to Salvage Cardiogenic-Shock Patients Suffering from Prolonged Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Authors:  Jia-Lin Chen; Yi-Ting Tsai; Chih-Yuan Lin; Hong-Yan Ke; Yi-Chang Lin; Hsiang-Yu Yang; Chien-Ting Liu; Shih-Ying Sung; Jui-Tsung Chang; Ying-Hsiang Wang; Tso-Chou Lin; Chien-Sung Tsai; Po-Shun Hsu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  When to use central mechanical support devices.

Authors:  Michael Salna; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2020-03-21

10.  Minimally invasive apical cannulation and cannula design for short-term mechanical circulatory support devices.

Authors:  Marcell Székely; Tamás Ruttkay; Ferenc Imre Suhai; Áron Bóna; Béla Merkely; László Székely
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 2.174

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.